Abstract
Described by Hartrampf et al. [1] in 1982 and popularized by many authors during the last 30 years, the use of the transverse skin and fat harvested from the lower abdominal region, the so-called transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, is still considered by many to be the gold standard for breast reconstruction. It gives the surgeon the possibility to recreate a breast of a desirable size with controlled shape.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hartrampf CR Jr, Scheflan M, Black PW (1982) Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:216
Moon HK, Taylor GI (1988) The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:815
Bostwick J, Nahai F, Watterson P et al (1993) TRAM flap delay for breast reconstruction in the right risk patient: definition of risk factors in 556 patients and evaluation of a 10 years experience with TRAM flap delay. Presented at the 72nd meeting of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, Philadelphia
Sano K, Hallock GG, Rice DC (2000) Venous supercharging augments survival of the delayed rat TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg 44:486–490
Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO (1989) Conventional TRAM versus free microvascular TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:828
Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME (1992) Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free over the conventional flap? Plast Reconstr Surg 90:255
Ishii CH, Bostwick J, Raine TT et al (1985) Double pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for unilateral breast and chest wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76(6):901–907
Watterson P, Bostwick J, Hester R, Bried JT, Tailor I (1995) TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10 year clinical experience with 556 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:1191
Bostwick J (1983) Aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Mosby, Saint Louis
Kroll SS, Marchi M (1992) Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 889:1045–1053
Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennet GK (1987) Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient: a critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg 295:508–518
Petit JY, Rietjens M, Gatusi C et al (2003) Abdominal complications and sequelae after breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flap. Is there still an indication for pedicled TRAM in the year 2003. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1063
Mizgala C, Hartrampf CR, Bennet C (1994) Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicle TRAM flap surgery. 5–7 year follow up of 150 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:998–1002
Miller M (2006) Surgery of the breast, vol 1, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
Chun Y, Sinha I, Turko A, Yuhen J, Lipsitz S, Pribaz J, Lee B (2010) Comparison on morbidity, functional outcome and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM or bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(4):1133–1141
Blondeel O, Depypere J, Roche N, Van der Lauduyt K, Plast R (2009) Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:455–462
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
(MOV 3379735 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leal, P.R. (2019). Bipedicled TRAM Flap. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M., El-Tamer, M., Sacchini, V.S. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62925-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62927-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)