Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools are gradually blending into the clinical neuroradiology practice. Due to increasing complexity and diversity of such AI tools, it is not always obvious for the clinical neuroradiologist to capture the technical specifications of these applications, notably as commercial tools very rarely provide full details. The clinical neuroradiologist is thus confronted with the increasing dilemma to base clinical decisions on the output of AI tools without knowing in detail what is happening inside the “black box” of those AI applications. This dilemma is aggravated by the fact that currently, no established and generally accepted rules exist concerning best clinical practice and scientific and clinical validation nor for the medico-legal consequences in cases of wrong diagnoses. The current review article provides a practical checklist of essential points, intended to aid the user to identify and double-check necessary aspects, although we are aware that not all this information may be readily available at this stage, even for certified and commercially available AI tools. Furthermore, we therefore suggest that the developers of AI applications provide this information.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable (review article).
Code availability
Not applicable (review article).
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Alzheimer dementia
- ADNI:
-
Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
- AI:
-
Artificial intelligence
- CADASIL:
-
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy
- CNN:
-
Convolutional neural networks
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- DICOM:
-
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine
- DL:
-
Deep learning
- GDPR:
-
General Data Protection Regulation
- MPRAGE:
-
Magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo
- MR:
-
Magnetic resonance
- MS:
-
Multiple sclerosis
- PHI:
-
Personal health information
- RANO:
-
Response assessment in neurooncology
- SaMD:
-
Software as a medical device
- SL:
-
Supervised learning
- SLE:
-
Systemic lupus erythematosus
- SVD:
-
Small vessel disease
- USL:
-
Unsupervised learning
References
Topol EJ (2019) High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25(1):44–56
Muehlematter UJ, Daniore P, Vokinger KN (2021) Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015–20): a comparative analysis. Lancet Digit Health 3:e195–e203
Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F (2018) Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp 2(1):35
Hedderich DM, Keicher M, Wiestler B, & Gruber… MJ (2021) AI for doctors—a course to educate medical professionals in artificial intelligence for medical imaging. Healthcare
Huisman M, Ranschaert E, Parker W, Mastrodicasa D, Koci M, Pinto de Santos D, Coppola F, Morozov S, Zins M, Bohyn C, Koç U, Wu J, Veean S, Fleischmann D, Leiner T, Willemink MJ (2021) An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude. Eur Radiol 31(9):7058–7066
Lui YW, Chang PD, Zaharchuk G, Barboriak DP, Flanders AE, Wintermark M, Hess CP, Filippi CG (2020) Artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: current status and future directions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41(8):E52–E59
Chartrand G, Cheng PM, Vorontsov E, Drozdzal M, Turcotte S, Pal CJ, Kadoury S, Tang A (2017) Deep learning: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 37(7):2113–2131
Cheng PM, Montagnon E, Yamashita R, Pan I, Cadrin-Chênevert A, Perdigón Romero F, Chartrand G, Kadoury S, Tang A (2021) Deep learning: an update for radiologists. Radiographics 41(5):1427–1445
Shen D, Wu G, Suk HI (2017) Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:221–248
Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K (2018) Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9(4):611–629
Park SH, Han K (2018) Methodologic guide for evaluating clinical performance and effect of artificial intelligence technology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Radiology 286(3):800–809
Sica GT (2006) Bias in research studies. Radiology 238(3):780–789
Molina D, Pérez-Beteta J, Martínez-González A, Martino J, Velasquez C, Arana E, Pérez-García VM (2017) Lack of robustness of textural measures obtained from 3D brain tumor MRIs impose a need for standardization. PLoS One 12(6):e0178843
Valverde JM, Imani V, Abdollahzadeh A, De Feo R, Prakash M, Ciszek R, Tohka J (2021) Transfer learning in magnetic resonance brain imaging: a systematic review. J Imaging 7(4):66
Haller S, Falkovskiy P, Meuli R, Thiran JP, Krueger G, Lovblad KO, Kober T, Roche A, Marechal B (2016) Basic MR sequence parameters systematically bias automated brain volume estimation. Neuroradiology 58(11):1153–1160
Biberacher V, Schmidt P, Keshavan A, Boucard CC, Righart R, Sämann P, Preibisch C, Fröbel D, Aly L, Hemmer B, Zimmer C, Henry RG, Mühlau M (2016) Intra- and interscanner variability of magnetic resonance imaging based volumetry in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 14:2188–197
Chaddad A, Kucharczyk MJ, Daniel P, Sabri S, Jean-Claude BJ, Niazi T, Abdulkarim B (2019) Radiomics in glioblastoma: current status and challenges facing clinical implementation. Front Oncol 9:374
Larson DB, Boland GW (2019) Imaging quality control in the era of artificial intelligence. J Am Coll Radiol 16(9 Pt B):1259–1266
Copelan AZ, Smith ER, Drocton GT, Narsinh KH, Murph D, Khangura RS, Hartley ZJ, Abla AA, Dillon WP, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Hetts SW, Cooke DL, Keenan K, Nelson J, Mccoy D, Ciano M, Amans MR (2020) Recent administration of iodinated contrast renders core infarct estimation inaccurate using RAPID software. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41(12):2235–2242
Aryanto KY, Oudkerk M, van Ooijen PM (2015) Free DICOM de-identification tools in clinical research: functioning and safety of patient privacy. Eur Radiol 25(12):3685–3695
Schwarz CG, Kremers WK, Therneau TM, Sharp RR, Gunter JL, Vemuri P, Arani A, Spychalla AJ, Kantarci K, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Jack CR (2019) Identification of anonymous MRI research participants with face-recognition software. N Engl J Med 381(17):1684–1686
Schwarz CG, Kremers WK, Wiste HJ, Gunter JL, Vemuri P, Spychalla AJ, Kantarci K, Schultz AP, Sperling RA, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Alzheimer’s DNI, (2021) Changing the face of neuroimaging research: comparing a new MRI de-facing technique with popular alternatives. Neuroimage 231:117845
Neubauer T, Heurix J (2011) A methodology for the pseudonymization of medical data. Int J Med Inform 80(3):190–204
Ngiam KY, Khor IW (2019) Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. Lancet Oncol 20(5):e262–e273
Willemink MJ, Koszek WA, Hardell C, Wu J, Fleischmann D, Harvey H, Folio LR, Summers RM, Rubin DL, Lungren MP (2020) Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology 295(1):4–15
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745&from=EN; Annex VIII
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/md_sector/docs/mdcg_2021-24_en.pdf AOD
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/overview-device-regulation/classify-your-medical-device AOD
van Leeuwen KG, Schalekamp S, Rutten MJCM, van Ginneken B, de Rooij M (2021) Artificial intelligence in radiology: 100 commercially available products and their scientific evidence. Eur Radiol 31(6):3797–3804
Pemberton HG, Zaki LAM, Goodkin O, Das RK, Steketee RME, Barkhof F, Vernooij MW (2021) Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis-a systematic review. Neuroradiology 63(11):1773–1789
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Sven HALLER
Literature review, manuscript editing, manuscript approval, figures.
Sofie Van Cauter
Literature review, manuscript editing, manuscript approval, figures.
Christian Federau
Literature review, manuscript editing, manuscript approval.
Dennis M. Hedderich
Literature review, manuscript editing, manuscript approval.
Myriam Edjlalis
Literature review, manuscript editing, manuscript approval.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Christian FEDERAU is working for AI Medical, yet there is no reference to this company in the current review article.
The other authors declare no conflict of interest related to the content of this review article.
Ethics approval
Not applicable (review article).
Consent to participate
Not applicable (review article).
Consent for publication
Not applicable (review article).
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haller, S., Van Cauter, S., Federau, C. et al. The R-AI-DIOLOGY checklist: a practical checklist for evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical neuroradiology. Neuroradiology 64, 851–864 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02890-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02890-w