Introduction

Gap junction channels (GJCs) provide a direct pathway for the rapid exchange of cytosolic signals between adjoining cells. They result from the docking of two hemichannels (HCs) arranged in series. Each HC or connexon consists of six subunits composed of connexin (Cx) molecules (Bruzzone et al. 1996). Each Cx molecule crosses the cell membrane four times, thus forming four transmembrane domains (M1–M4), two extracellular loops (E1 and E2), a cytoplasmic loop (CL) and an intracellular amino and carboxyl terminus (NT and CT). More than 20 different mammalian Cxs have been identified (Sohl and Willecke 2004), three of which—Cx43, Cx40 and Cx45—are expressed in cardiac myocytes. In addition, a further Cx, Cx30.2, has been reported in mouse atrioventricular (AV) node myocytes (Kreuzberg et al. 2005); but the orthologue of this Cx (Cx31.9) is not detectable in human AV nodes (Kreuzberg et al. 2009). Each isoform exhibits a different expression pattern (Van Veen et al. 2001; Severs et al. 2004) and forms channels of distinct electrical and diffusional properties (Harris 2001; Kreuzberg et al. 2005).

Recombinant proteins are versatile tools in biological research. To facilitate their use in studies on the synthesis, expression and structure or function of proteins, easy and reliable chasing methods have been developed. For example, epitope tagging enables the use of different antibodies, and addition of sequences permits the use of defined protocols for protein purification (GST, V5/6xHis) (Terpe 2003). To examine the channel structural makeup and properties such as localization, trafficking, turnover and permeability, reliable detection and purification of Cxs are crucial. Tagging of Cxs with recognizable moieties, such as fluorescent GFP, CFP or YFP, has become a useful approach. His tag, a hexa moiety, has been introduced for easy separation of proteins by affinity chromatography using Ni2+-chelating resins (Terpe 2003). The latter has also been used to study molecular interactions between Cxs (Martinez et al. 2002) and with associated molecules such as ZO-1 (Toyofuku et al. 1998; Hunter et al. 2005).

It is frequently assumed that addition of a V5/6-His tag to a protein has little or no effect on function. However, this has yet to be confirmed experimentally. In the present study focusing on the major cardiac Cxs (Cx40, Cx43 and Cx45), we tested this assumption by means of electrophysiological measurements.

Methods

His Tagging of Connexins

The tag used for this work contains 31 residues including a 14-residue epitope, readily detectable by a sensitive anti-V5 antibody, and a stretch of histidines to facilitate purification with Ni2+-chelating resins (hexa moiety, M r = 0.93 kDa). In order to add the molecular V5/6-His tag (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at the end of the Cxs, we first amplified them by PCR using primers that contain restriction sites for directional cloning and in-frame insertion into pcDNA3.1V5/His. The templates used were pBLUESCRIPT containing rat Cx43 (GJA1; www.genenames.org/genefamily/gj.php; gift from E. C. Beyer) or mouse Cx40 and Cx45 (GJA5, GJC1; gifts from K. Willecke). The forward primer for Cx43 adds a BamH1 site (ggatcc) three bases before the start codon on the natural rat Cx43 sequence, and the forward primers for Cx40 and Cx45 add a Hind3 site (aagctt) three bases before the start codon on the natural mouse sequences. The reverse primers all include an Xho1 site that removes the stop codon (all amino acids of Cxs are retained) and allows subcloning in-frame to version A of pcDNA3.1V5/6-His. These plasmids were tested, and, as in many transfection experiments using conventional plasmids, expression of the transfected Cxs was heterogeneous, with large areas of cells displaying no labeling. To overcome this problem, which artificially decreases the incidence of coupling (as some cell pairs do not express the transfected Cx and do not show junctional communication), we recloned the tagged Cx in pIRES Hygro (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA; see generic map Fig. 1), allowing a single mRNA to code for both connexin and hygromycin resistance, therefore selecting out the nonexpressing cells. This was done using similar primers as above but containing an EcoRV site instead of the BamH1/Hind3 and a primer specific for the molecular tag that includes a Not1 site (common for the three tagged Cxs). The templates were pcDNA3.1 constructs, described above. The PCR product was thereafter cloned into pIRES Hygro (Clontech, see generic map Fig. 1). For ligation, all PCR products and all plasmids were cut with the appropriate restriction enzyme and gel-purified on low-melt agarose. All ligations were done using the T4 ligase. Transformation of Escherichia coli HB101, selection on ampicillin plates and plasmid purification (mini and large prep) were done as described previously (Sambrook et al. 1989).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Generic plasmid map of the construct used. The CMV promoter generates a bicistronic mRNA that codes for a Cx (CxXX: XX = 40, 43 or 45) and hygromycin B resistance

Cell Cultures and Transfection

Human HeLa cells (ATCC code CCL2) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin. Cells were kept in an incubator at 37°C (5% CO2, 95% ambient air) and passaged weekly. Transfections were made in serum-free DMEM using lipofectin, as recommended by the manufacturer. After 10–15 days of selection with 250 μg/ml hygromycin B, individual clones were picked up using cloning cylinders, sealed to the dish with sterile vacuum grease, and trypsin digested. Transfectants were maintained in DMEM containing 250 μg/ml hygromycin B. To carry out experiments, cells were seeded onto sterile glass coverslips placed in Petri dishes. They were ready for use 1–2 days after plating. In the case of mixed cultures (see electronic supplement), prior to plating one type of cell was labeled with a fluorescent dye (2.5 μM 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate, 1 h; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).

Sample Preparation and Western Blotting

Sample preparation and Western blotting methods were as previously described (Dupont et al. 1988, 2001). Briefly, cell monolayers were lysed in SB20 (0.1 M Tris [pH 6.8], 10 mM EDTA, 20% SDS) and sonicated, protein content was assayed using the Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA) DC protein assay and 2-mercaptoethanol was added to a final concentration of 2.5%. Five micrograms of total protein were loaded per lane, and samples were run on 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically tank-transferred to PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P). Replicas were incubated with primary antibody (anti-V5, Invitrogen) and then with alkaline phosphatase–conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Enzymatic activity was revealed using NBT/BCIP substrate solution.

Immunofluorescence Labeling

Transfected cells were cultured on round glass coverslips at the bottom of culture wells (24-well plates). Labeling was carried out as described previously (Coppen et al. 1998). Briefly, cells were rinsed in Ca2+ containing PBS, fixed in cold methanol and rinsed again prior to blocking in a solution of PBS/1% BSA. Slides were then incubated with the primary antibody of choice (rabbit anti-Cx40 S15C[R83]) (Severs et al. 2001), mouse monoclonal anti-Cx43 (MAB3068; Chemicon, Temecula, CA), mouse monoclonal anti-Cx45 Q14E(mab19-11-5) (Coppen et al. 2003) or mouse monoclonal anti-V5 (Invitrogen). After washing, immunoreactivity was detected using Cy3-labeled secondary antibodies (donkey antimouse IgG, Chemicon; swine anti-rabbit, Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Cells were rewashed and mounted with Citifluor mounting medium (Agar, Stansted, UK). Specificity of labeling was confirmed by the omission of primary antibody and by checking reactivity on cells expressing irrelevant Cxs. All were negative. Immunolabeling was examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany; TCS 4D).

Electrophysiological Measurements

Electrical recordings were performed as previously described (Desplantez et al. 2004). Briefly, glass coverslips with adherent cells were transferred to a chamber placed on an inverted microscope (Diaphot-TMD; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), cell pairs were chosen and the dual voltage-clamp method (EPC 9/2; Heka Elektronik, Lambrecht/Pfalz, Germany) in the whole-cell configuration was applied. This method enabled control of the membrane potential of each cell, V 1 and V 2, to establish transjunctional potentials, V V 2 − V 1, and measure the gap junction currents, −I j. Experiments were performed at room temperature (22–25°C) in modified Krebs-Ringer solution (in mM): NaCl, 140; KCl, 4; CaCl2, 2; MgCl2, 1; HEPES, 5 (pH 7.4); sodium pyruvate, 2; glucose, 5. Immediately before use, patch pipettes were filled with internal solution (in mM): potassium aspartate, 130; NaCl, 10; CaCl2, 1; MgATP, 3; EGTA, 10 (pCa ~8); HEPES, 5 (pH 7.2). When filled with solution, patch pipettes had DC resistances of 2–5 MΩ.

Acquisition and Analysis of Electrophysiological Data

Voltage and current signals were stored on a PC for offline analysis. Current signals were Bessel-filtered (1 kHz) and digitized (3.33 kHz). Data acquisition and analysis were done with PULSE and PULSFIT software (Heka Elektronik); curve fitting and statistics were performed with SigmaPlot and SigmaStat, respectively (Jandel Scientific, Erkrath, Germany). For analysis, the amplitude of I j was determined at the beginning, I j,inst (inst, instantaneous), and end, I j,ss (ss, steady state), of each V j pulse. At large V j, I j,inst was gained by extrapolation to time t = 0 s (onset of pulse). Conductances were calculated as g j,inst = I j,inst/V j and g j,ss = I j,ss/V j. Values of g j,ss were normalized with respect to g j,inst, sampled, averaged and plotted as g j,ss vs. V j. Curve fitting was done with the Boltzmann equation separately applied to negative and positive V j data (Valiunas et al. 1999):

$$ g_{\text{j,ss}} = {\frac{{1 - g_{\text{j},\min } }}{{1 + e^{{\left[ {A \cdot \left( {V_{\text{j}} - V_{\text{j},0} } \right)} \right]}} }}} + g_{\text{j},\min } $$
(1)

The parameter g j,min is the normalized conductance at large V j, and V j,0 corresponds to V j at which g j,ss/g j,inst is half-maximally deactivated. A is a constant expressing gating charge, zq(kT)−1, where z is the equivalent number of unitary positive charges (q) moving through the electric field applied and k and T are the Boltzmann constant and the temperature in Kelvin, respectively. In the case of asymmetrical behavior (see also electronic supplement), the g j,ss/g j,inst data were fitted to a modified equation which allowed simultaneous treatment of data for positive and negative V j (Chen-Izu et al. 2001). To analyze the time course of I j deactivation, the I j signals were subjected to a least-square curve fitting. They were best described by single exponentials or the sum of two exponentials (Sakai et al. 2003):

$$ I_{\text{j}} (t) = I_{\text{j}1,\text{inst}} e^{{ -{\frac{\text{t}}{{\tau_{\text{d1}} }}}}} + I_{\text{j}2,\text{inst}} e^{{ -{\frac{\text{t}}{{\tau_{\text{d2}} }}}}} + I_{\text{j,ss}} $$
(2)

I j1,inst and I j2,inst are the amplitudes of I j representing the contribution of the fast and slow components, respectively, prevailing at the beginning of a voltage pulse; I j,ss is the amplitude of I j at the end of a voltage pulse; and τd1 and τd2 are the respective time constants of deactivation.

Poorly coupled cell pairs or normally coupled pairs partially uncoupled with heptanol (3 mM) were used to study single-channel currents elicited at different V j gradients of either polarity. Current records were analyzed to determine the amplitude of discrete current levels.

The data are presented as means ± 1 SEM. Data were compared with Student’s t-test, unpaired. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Transfection and Transfectant Characterization

Our original transfection using the pcDNA3.1 constructs generated clones that displayed a heterogeneous expression, with areas of the dish expressing very little Cx. Although resistant to hygromycin B, no Cx expression could be detected in the majority of the clones. Using an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) to physically link Cx and antibiotic resistance on the same mRNA (see Fig. 1), the majority of transfectants were positive for Cx expression and a homogeneous pattern of expression was obtained (see Fig. 2; see also Halliday et al. 2003). Cxs are detectable with anti-V5 antibodies and with their respective anti-Cx antibodies. However, cytoplasmic detectability representing cytoplasmic connexons was somewhat stronger with the V5 antibody. For Cx45, most of the signal was cytoplasmic and little was found in the form of gap junctions. Nevertheless, typical punctate labeling at cell contacts representing gap junctions was detectable with all antibodies (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Characterization of transfectants by immunofluorescence. Upper images Staining with specific anti-Cx antibody. Lower images Staining with anti-V5 antibody. Note the strong intracellular labeling, particularly when using anti-V5 antibody. Cx45 junctional labeling is always present but dim

Since the Cxs are tagged with the same epitope (V5), Cx levels can be compared. The Western blot experiments in Fig. 3 show that the levels of expression in the transfectants followed the sequence Cx43 > Cx45 > Cx40 but the differences were not large. Detection with the specific anti-Cx antibodies shows identical results in terms of banding pattern and molecular weight (data not shown).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Characterization of transfectants by Western blotting. Migration was from top to bottom. Names of the clonal lines are indicated at the top. The different tagged connexins were detected using the same anti-V5 antibody. The migration of each connexin is indicated. Comparison of expression levels is possible because of the presence of the same epitope on the three different molecules. Although comparable, the level of expression is higher for Cx43, lower for Cx40 and intermediate for Cx45. Note that the tagged Cx43 migrates with the classical multiband pattern caused by various levels of phosphorylation

Voltage Dependence of g j

Figure 4a, upper panel, shows records of junctional currents, I j, of a cell pair expressing His-tagged rat Cx43 (Cx43-tag). Signals were evoked by pulsing cell 1 to establish a transjunctional voltage, V j, of ±10, ±40, ±70, ±100 and ±130 mV. Depolarization of cell 1 provoked a negative V j and led to an inward I j (downward deflection) and vice versa (see Electrophysiological Measurements). The currents were symmetrical with regard to V j polarity. Figure 4a, lower panel, summarizes the results of homotypic Cx43-tag channels plotting the normalized conductance at steady state, g j,ss/g j,inst, vs. V j (●). The data follow a symmetrical sigmoidal relationship. The solid curve represents the best fit of data to Eq. 1. The dashed curve shows the function g j,ss/g j,inst = f(V j) for homotypic wt-43 channels (data points omitted for clarity; replotted from Desplantez et al. 2004). The Boltzmann parameters of Cx43-tag and wt-Cx43 channels are given in Table 1. Data comparison indicates that g j,ss of the Cx43-tag is less voltage-sensitive. When extrapolated to V j = 0 mV, the average maximal conductance, G j,inst, of the Cx43-tag was 3.0 ±0.26 nS (n = 10). Hence, it is 2.7-fold smaller than that of wt-Cx43, i.e., 8.0 ±1.6 nS (n = 11, taken from Desplantez et al. 2004), P < 0.025.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Homotypic cell pairs: voltage dependence of g j. Data of Cx43-tag (a), Cx40-tag (b) and Cx45-tag (c) cell pairs. Upper panels Superimposed current records, I j. Currents elicited at V j = ±10, ±40, ±70, ±100 and ±130 mV. Note different vertical scales. Inset in b Example of a complex I j signal at V j = –130 mV. Lower panels Respective plots of normalized conductance at steady-state, g j,ss/g j,inst vs. V j (●). Solid curve Best fit of data to the Boltzmann equation for tagged channels. Dashed curve Best fit for wild-type channels (wt-Cx43, wt-Cx45 from Desplantez et al. [2004]; wt-Cx40 from Desplantez et al. [2007]; data points omitted for clarity). For analysis, see text; for data, see Table 1

Table 1 Boltzmann parameters

Figure 4b, upper panel, shows I j records of a cell pair expressing the Cx40-tag. The currents were symmetrical with respect to V j polarity. In contrast to wt-Cx40 channels (Desplantez et al. 2007), currents carried by Cx40-tag channels failed to decay exponentially at |V j| > 100 mV. Instead, I j showed a complex response consisting of a large initial spike, followed by a small component with a transient increase (see inset). Figure 4b, lower panel, summarizes the results for both types of cell pairs, showing plots of the normalized function g j,ss/g j,inst = f(V j). The data of Cx40-tag (●, solid curve) and wt-Cx40 channels (dashed curve, data points omitted for clarity; replotted from Desplantez et al. 2007) exhibited a symmetrical sigmoidal relationship. The curves represent the best fit of data to Eq. 1 (for Boltzmann parameters, see Table 1). Data comparison indicates that g j,ss of Cx40-tag is slightly more sensitive to V j. The average G j,inst of the Cx40-tag extrapolated to V j = 0 mV was 2.5 ± 0.5 nS (n = 4), i.e., 2.5-fold smaller than that of w-Cx40, 6.3 ±0.9 nS (n = 13, taken from Desplantez et al. 2007), P > 0.05.

Figure 4c, upper panel, shows I j records of a cell pair expressing the Cx45-tag. Figure 4c, lower panel, summarizes the results for both types of cell pairs plotting g j,ss/g j,inst = f(V j). In the case of the Cx45-tag (●, solid curve) and wt-Cx45 (dashed curve, data points omitted for clarity; replotted from Desplantez et al. 2004), the data described a symmetrical bell-shaped relationship. Curves correspond to the best fit of data to Eq. 1 (for Boltzmann parameters, see Table 1). Data comparison reveals that g j,ss of the Cx45-tag is slightly less sensitive to V j. The average G j,inst of the Cx45-tag extrapolated to V j = 0 mV was 0.9 ±0.1 nS (n = 5), i.e. 6.7-fold smaller that that of wt-Cx45, 6.0 ±0.5 nS (n = 13, taken from Desplantez et al. 2004), P < 0.005. Another series of experiments explored the multichannel properties of heterotypic wt-Cx/Cx-tag cell pairs (see electronic supplement).

Kinetics of I j Deactivation

In homotypic Cx43-tag and wt-Cx43 channels, I j decreased with time monoexponentially at smaller V j and biexponentially at larger V j, giving rise to one or two time constants of deactivation, i.e., τd1 or τd1 and τd2 (see Eq. 2); τd2 was apparent at |V j| ≥ 80 and 90 mV, respectively (data not shown). Since τd1 predominantly determines the decay of I j and τd2 was difficult to assess due to signal size, the former was used for further analysis. Reliable τd1 data were obtained at |V j| ≥ 50 mV. At smaller voltages, the analysis was hampered by slow decays and poor signal-to-noise ratios. Figure 5a summarizes the results of the analysis plotting the function τd1 = f(V j) for Cx43-tag (●, solid curve) and wt-Cx43 (dashed curve, data points omitted for clarity; replotted from Desplantez et al. 2004). Values for negative and positive V j were pooled for reasons of symmetry. Curves represent the best fit of data to a single exponential (for parameters, see Table 2). They indicate that tagging decreased τd1 at 50 mV < |V j| < 100 mV and increased it at 50 mV > |V j| > 100 mV, hence accelerating and decelerating I j deactivation, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Kinetics of I j deactivation. Plot of time constants of I j deactivation of fast component, τd1, vs. V j. Data of Cx43 (a), Cx40 (b) and Cx45 (c). Solid curve and ● Best fit of data to an exponential for tagged channels. Dashed curve and ○ Best fit for wild-type channels (wt-Cx43 and wt-Cx45 reproduced from Desplantez et al. 2004, data points omitted). For analysis, see text; for data, see Table 2

Table 2 Kinetics of fast component of I j deactivation

In Cx40-tag channels, I j decreased with time monoexponentially at |V j| ≤ 100 mV, giving rise to τd1 (not shown); at |V j| > 100 mV, I j showed a rapid decay followed by a slow transient increase, thus preventing further analysis (see Fig. 4b, inset). In wt-Cx40 channels, I j decreased monoexponentially at smaller V j and biexponentially at larger V j, giving rise to τd1 or τd1 and τd2, respectively; τd2 was visible at |V j| ≥ 100 mV (not shown). Figure 5b summarizes the results of the analysis plotting τd1 = f(V j) for Cx40-tag (●, solid curve) and wt-Cx40 (○, dashed curve). Values for negative and positive V j were pooled. Smooth curves represent the best fit of data to an exponential (for parameters, see Table 2). Curves indicate that tagging decreased τd1 at each |V j| examined, thus accelerating I j deactivation throughout.

In Cx45-tag and wt-Cx45 channels, I j decreased monoexponentially at smaller V j and biexponentially at larger V j furnishing τd1 or τd1 and τd2; τd2 was apparent at |V j| ≥ 80 and 90 mV, respectively (not shown). Figure 5c summarizes the results of the analysis plotting τd1 = f(V j) for Cx45-tag (●, solid curve) and wt-Cx45 (dashed curve, data points omitted; replotted from Desplantez et al. 2004). Again, values for negative and positive V j were pooled. Smooth curves represent the best fit of data to an exponential (for parameters, see Table 2). Curves reveal that tagging had no effect on τd1.

Ij deactivation of channels made of tagged or wild-type Cxs proceeds biexponentially at larger Vjs, suggesting the operation of fast and slow components, Ij1 and Ij2 (see Eq. 2). Hence, kinetic analyses furnish not only time constants, i.e., τd1 and τd2 (see above), but also values for the relative contribution of both components, i.e., Ij1,inst and Ij2,inst, corresponding to their fractional amplitudes of Ij at time t = 0. The mean values obtained for Ij1,inst and Ij2,inst determined at Vj = 110 mV are given in Table 3. Comparison of the data indicates that tagging lowered Ij1,inst and increased Ij2,inst, irrespective of the type of Cx, implying a shift from the fast to the slow component.

Table 3 Contribution of fast and slow components of I j deactivation

Unitary Conductances

Cell pairs poorly coupled or partially uncoupled by exposure to 3 mM heptanol were used to examine single-channel currents. Figure 6, left panels, shows records of a homotypic Cx43-tag (Fig. 6a), Cx40-tag (Fig. 6b) and Cx45-tag cell pair (Fig. 6c). For comparison, Fig. 6, right panels, shows records of a homotypic wt-Cx43 (Fig. 6a), wt-Cx40 (Fig. 6b) and wt-Cx45 cell pairs (Fig. 6c). Currents were elicited with a symmetrical bipolar pulse protocol, establishing a positive and negative V j. In each case, I j revealed two prominent levels, attributable to the channel main open state (dashed line) and residual open state (pointed line). A closed state was observed occasionally (see Fig. 6a, left and right panels). The solid line refers to zero current. Channel conductances gained from such records were sampled, averaged and plotted as frequency histograms (Fig. 6a–c). Smooth curves represent the best fit of data to the sum of two gaussians. The left- and right-hand distributions correspond to the conductance of the residual state, γj,residual, and main state, γj,main, respectively. The means ± 1 SEM derived from the peaks are given in Table 4. The data indicate that tagging decreases the channel conductance of Cx43 and Cx45 but not of Cx40. Using the same experimental approach, we also examined the single-channel properties of heterotypic wt-Cx/Cx-tag cell pairs (see electronic supplement).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Homotypic cell pairs: single-channel conductance. Data of cell pairs with tagged Cxs (left) and wild-type Cxs (right). Upper panels Pulse protocol (V 1, V 2) and current signal, I j. Solid line Zero current level. Pointed line Channel residual state. Dashed line Channel main state. Lower panels Frequency histogram of channel conductances. Curves reflect best fit of data to the sum of two gaussians; peaks to the left and right correspond to the mean conductance of the residual state, γj,residual, and main state, γj,main, respectively. a Cx43 channels, bin width 5 pS. b Cx40 channels, bin width 5 pS. c Cx45 channels, bin width 2 pS (smaller values require a narrower bin width)

Table 4 Single-channel conductances

Discussion

This study shows that fusion of a V5/6-His tag (hexa moiety M r = 0.93 kDa) to the CT segment of Cx40, Cx43 and Cx45 does not prevent the cells from forming channels. The tag contains 31 residues, including a 14-residue epitope readily detectable by a sensitive anti-V5 antibody and a stretch of histidines to facilitate purification with Ni2+-chelating resins. Immunoblot experiments indicate that expression is highest in Cx43 and lowest in Cx40 transfectants. Immunoconfocal experiments reveal that all constructs are detectable by both the Cx-specific and the anti-V5 antibodies as spots at cellular interfaces that represent GJCs. However, a sizable amount of intracellular immunoreactivity is also seen in the vicinity of the Golgi apparatus, particularly when using anti-V5 antibody. This phenomenon is less prominent in wt-Cxs (not shown), indicating that the tag interferes with trafficking but does not prevent protein folding, HC assembly and trafficking or HC insertion and docking. The final extremity of the CT of Cx43 (and probably of Cx40 and Cx45) contains a PDZ-binding domain, and C-terminal tagging has been shown to interfere with ZO-1 binding (Toyofuku et al. 1998; Hunter et al. 2005; Giepmans and Moolenaar 1998; Laing et al. 2001). Loss of interaction with PDZ-containing proteins such as ZO-1 appears to interfere with trafficking. Interestingly, our anti-Cx40 antibody S15C(R83) does not bind to the cytoplasmic pool of Cx40-tag (although anti-V5 antibody binds to it), suggesting that residues 256–270 are not accessible to antibody binding during trafficking in the trans-Golgi network.

Our electrophysiological experiments demonstrate that V5/6-His tagged Cxs do form functional GJCs. Tagging provokes subtle changes at the multichannel and single-channel levels. The effects are Cx-dependent.

Electrophysiological and Biochemical Data

Making use of the mean values of multichannel conductance, G j,inst (see Voltage Dependence of g j), and single-channel conductance, γj,main (see Table 4), we estimated the average number of functional channels as the ratio A = G j,instj,main. The numbers obtained were 20, 104 and 43 for homotypic Cx40-tag, Cx43-tag and Cx45-tag channels, respectively, which roughly match the expression levels observed by Western blotting using the anti-V5 antibody. Likewise, the estimated numbers of functional channels for the homotypic wt-Cx40, wt-Cx43 and wt-Cx45 channels were 49, 137 and 223, respectively.

The ratios A = G j,instj,main deduced from studies on mixed wt-Cx/Cx-tag cell pairs (G j,inst data, see electronic supplement; γj,main data, see Table 4) have also been used to estimate the number of functional heterotypic channels. The values were 4 for Cx40, 84 for Cx43 and 160 for Cx45. This indicates that the tag prevents proper docking and/or opening for Cx40 since each cell line has a much larger capacity for channel formation/opening. This is reminiscent of the observation that exchanging Cx40 CT for Cx43 CT leads to low channel formation (Haubrich et al. 1996). For Cx43, the reduction of the number of channels is less prominent but may be due to similar causes. However, wild-type Cx45 seems to rescue the poor coupling obtained with tagged Cx45 to a level similar to the wild-type molecule, indicating that tagged Cx45 has a much larger capacity for communication. These observations indicate a strong influence of the CT in channel formation/opening.

Immunofluorescence experiments indicate the detectability of gap junctions to be Cx45 < Cx40 ≤ Cx43 for both tagged and wild-type Cxs, suggesting that the number of open channels correlates poorly with levels of expression or number and size of gap junctions and thus indicates a specific regulation for each Cx in HeLa cells. This confirms previous findings that only a small fraction of channels are functional (Bukauskas et al. 2000).

Electrical Properties of Cx43-Tag Channels

Among the Cxs examined, tagging of Cx43 most prominently alters the properties of multichannel and single-channel currents. These findings have to be discussed in the context of the current concept of GJC operation, which proposes two V j-sensitive gates acting separately in each HC, a fast gate characterized by fast current transitions between the main state and residual state and a slow gate allocated by slow current transitions between the main state and closed state (Bukauskas and Verselis 2004). At the multichannel level, these gates enable fast and slow components of I j deactivation as reflected by a biexponential process. This concept relies on the following results. Fusion of EGFP (Mr ≈ 28 kDa) to CT of Cx43 impairs the V j sensitivity of I j, decreases g j,min at large V j and eliminates γj,residual, implying that CT elongation eliminates fast V j gating (Bukauskas et al. 2001). However, CT truncation of Cx43 provokes similar effects, a decrease in V j sensitivity of I j and g j,min, loss of the fast component of I j deactivation and γj,residual and prolongation of P o (Revilla et al. 1999; Moreno et al. 2002). This suggests that the CT is an effecter of fast V j gating, likely to interact with a receptor at the pore-forming region involving the NT and/or CL domain (Bukauskas et al. 2001; Shibayama et al. 2006). Hence, a change in CT length modifies or eliminates inherent properties of GJCs.

Our experiments reveal that V5/6-His tagging of Cx43 (M r = 0.93 kDa) evokes changes in channel properties resembling those described above but less developed. It prominently reduces the V j sensitivity of I j, as indicated by a larger V j,0 and smaller z, and increases the residual conductance at large V j, as reflected by a rise in g j,min (see Table 1). The reduced V j sensitivity may result from lowering the preference for fast V j gating against slow V j gating. This is consistent with our data on I j deactivation kinetics, showing that the Cx43-tag lowers the relative contribution of fast V j gating as indicated by the values of I j1,inst and I j2,inst derived from the biexponential decay of I j (see Table 3). This raises the question of how to explain the increase in g j,min instead of a decrease. A plausible assumption would be that tagging increases γj,residual, yet our data show a decrease (see Table 4). Alternatively, it may increase the channel mean open time as reported for CT-truncated Cx43 (Moreno et al. 2002) and thus elevate g j,min.

V5/6-His tagging affects Cx43 channels beyond the phenomena attributable to fast V j gating. Relevant are the effects on kinetics of I j deactivation and channel conductance. Concerning kinetics, it affects τd1 to accelerate I j deactivation at 50 mV < |V j| < 100 mV and decelerate at 50 mV > |V j| > 100 mV, giving rise to a decrease in V τ and an increase in τd,0 (see Table 2). Hence, the Cx43-tag alters the kinetics of the fast component. Conceivably, changes in structure and/or electric charge of V5/6-His-tagged CT may interfere with this process, directly or indirectly. Unfortunately, our experiments yielded no reliable τd2 data. Concerning channel conductance, tagging provokes a prominent decrease in γj,main and γj,residual (see Table 4). The concomitant change suggests a modification on the open channel pore. Since CT is not a key component of the ion-conducting pathway, a direct effect seems unlikely.

Examining 6-His-tagged Cx43 channels, Martinez et al. (2002) reached somewhat different results and conclusions. As to multichannel properties, their g j,ss = f(V j) graph also showed a lower voltage sensitivity and a larger g j,min, but they ascribed these effects to changing access resistance. As to single channels, they observed no changes in unitary conductance. Overall, they concluded the “theoretical risk” of altered behavior of Cx43 is not given. Therefore, while our results are consistent with their multichannel data, our interpretation is not. Concerning single-channel data, our results deviate from theirs. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. It may be due to the missing V5 epitope on their His tag.

Electrical Properties of Cx40-Tag Channels

V5/6-His tagging of Cx40 exerts moderate changes on multichannel properties and virtually none on single-channel properties. With regard to the former, it increases the V j sensitivity of I j, as indicated by a smaller V j,0 and a larger z, and elevates the residual conductance at large V j, as evidenced by a larger g j,min. Hence, the directional changes on V j,0 and z are opposite to those of Cx43-tag (see Table 1). The larger V j sensitivity may be explained by an increased preference of fast over slow V j gating. However, our values of I j1,inst and I j2,inst show the opposite (see Table 3).

In wt-Cx40 cell pairs, I j deactivates biexponentially with time. In Cx40-tag pairs, it inactivates monoexponentially at |V j| ≤ 100 mV, giving rise to τd1 data; however, at |V j| > 100 mV, I j shows a rapid decay followed by a slow transient increase, thus preventing standard analysis. Conceivably, this reflects a superposition of fast and slow V j gating, putatively responding to positive and negative polarity, respectively (Bukauskas and Verselis 2004). Moreover, tagging of Cx40 alters τd1, accelerating I j deactivation prominently at |V j| < 80 mV and marginally at |V j| 80 mV, giving rise to an increase in V τ and a decrease in τd,0 (see Table 2). This implies that the Cx40-tag also affects the kinetics of the fast component. Conceivably, its accelerated deactivation contributes to the increased V j sensitivity of I j. Since the Cx40-tag has nearly no effect on γj,main and γj,residual (see Table 4), the elevated g j,min cannot be ascribed to a change in γj,residual. Alternatively, it may reflect an increase in P o. Overall, tagging of Cx40 exerts changes in channel properties different from those of Cx43.

It has been reported that CT truncation of Cx40 increased the V j sensitivity of I j, decreased g j,min at large V j, impaired the fast component of I j deactivation and wiped out γj,residual without affecting γj,main (Anumonwo et al. 2001). These changes resemble those seen in CT-truncated Cx43, with the differences that g j,ss is more sensitive to V j and the effects are less prominent (see above). Likewise, when compared with Cx43-tag, Cx40-tag channels give rise to an inverse directional change in V j sensitivity of I j but overall provoke less vigorous changes.

Electrical Properties of Cx45-Tag Channels

V5/6-His tagging of Cx45 leads to moderate effects on multi- and single-channel properties. As to multichannels, it decreases the V j sensitivity of I j, as indicated by a larger V j,0 and smaller z, and slightly decreases the residual conductance at large V j, as indicated by the smaller g j,min (see Table 1). This pattern of modifications is reminiscent of lowering the relative preference for fast V j gating. Qualitatively, it resembles the behavior of channels made of GFP-elongated Cx43 (Bukauskas et al. 2001) and CT-truncated Cx43 (Revilla et al. 1999). In contrast to Cx43 and Cx40, tagging of Cx45 has virtually no effect on τd1, as evidenced by nearly unchanged values of V τ and τd,0 (see Table 2). As to single channels, tagging of Cx45 substantially decreases γj,main and γj,residual (see Table 4). The change in γj,residual tends to decrease g j,min and thus explains the observed modification of g j,min. Hence, although less prominent, the responses of Cx45 channels to tagging resemble those of Cx43 channels.

Mechanism of Action of V5/6-His Tag on Channel Properties

When compared with truncated CT or GFP-elongated CT, the effects of V5/6-His-tagged Cxs are less prominent, suggesting that the latter represent graded, rather than all-or-none, responses. In view of the diversity in CT modification, this is not surprising. V5/6-His tagging may cause subtle modifications in Cx structure and hence provoke less vigorous changes in channel properties.

Conceivably, the effects of V5/6-His tagging attributable to fast V j gating arise from disturbed molecular interactions between the tagged-CT domain and a receptor site near the cytoplasmic channel mouth. This view emerges from a “particle–receptor” model of fast V j gating (Moreno et al. 2002). In the case of Cx43-tag channels, a particle–receptor interaction during V j gating could be hampered electrostatically and/or sterically. Comparison of the net charge distribution at putative particle and receptor sites of wt-Cx43 and Cx43-tags renders the former effect possible. Histidine residues in proteins carry one positive charge at pHi = 7.2; i.e., the CT of Cx43-tag terminates with six positive charges. Hence, a receptor located in the NT and/or CL region carrying a positive charge would permit molecular interactions with negative charges of the CT tail of wt-Cx43 but impair interactions with the CT tail of Cx43-tag, thus enabling or impeding fast V j gating, respectively. Interestingly, charge-substitution studies on CL of Cx43 have shown that position 142 is critically involved in fast V j gating, lending support to a “ball-and-chain” model (Shibayama et al. 2006). This concept may also apply to Cx45-tag and Cx40-tag channels. However, for the latter it needs modification to account for the observed inverse effect on fast V j gating.

Mutations at sites significantly removed from areas putatively assigned to specific functions could still affect protein conformation and channel properties. We speculate that the changes in kinetics of I j deactivation are conferred in this way. V5/6-His tagging may convert the tertiary structure of CT, impede the disposition of its particles to interact with receptors in the NT and/or CL region and thereby alter τd1 as shown for Cx43-tag and Cx40-tags. The changes in unitary conductance of Cx43 and Cx45-tags could be entailed similarly. V5/6-His tagging may disrupt the formation of helix packing; alter the ion-conducting pathway given by areas of NT, M1/E1 and M3; and thereby modify current flow (Yeager and Harris 2007).