Abstract
This work aims at studying the effect of broken multi type V-baffles on heat transfer, pressure drop, and thermal hydraulic performance characteristics in an air channel is experimentally investigated. The air channel had aspect ratio of 10.0 and the Reynolds number (Re) based upon the mass flow rate of air (m a ) at entrance of the channel varied from 3000 to 8000. The discrete baffle distance (D d /L v ) varied from 0.27 to 0.77, relative baffle gap width (G w /H B ) varied from 0.50 to 1.5, relative baffle height (H B /H D ) varied from 0.25 to 1.0, relative baffle pitch (P B /H B ) varied from 8.0 to 12, relative baffle width (W D /H D ) varied from 1.0 to 6.0, and flow attack angle (α a )varied from 30° to 70°. It has been found that performance of broken multi type V-baffles air channel is better than the performance of smooth surface air channel for the range of geometrical parameters investigated. Experimental results observed that maximum enhancement in overall thermal performance have been found at Dd/Lv value of 0.67, Gw/HB value of 1.0, HB/HD value of 0.50, P B /H B value of 10, and αavalue of 60°.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A p :
-
Surface area of heated plate, m 2
- A o :
-
Area of orifice, m 2
- C do :
-
Coefficient of discharge
- C p :
-
Specific heat of air, J/kgK
- D d :
-
Gap or discrete distance [m]
- G w :
-
Gap or discrete width [m]
- G w /H B :
-
Relative gap width
- h t :
-
Convective heat transfer coefficient [W . m −2 K −1]
- D hd :
-
Hydraulic diameter of channel, m
- f :
-
Friction factor
- f rs :
-
Friction factor of roughened baffle
- f ss :
-
Friction factor smooth baffle
- h t :
-
Convective heat transfer coefficient, W/m 2 K
- H D :
-
Height of channel,m
- H B :
-
Height of baffle, m
- H B /H D :
-
Relative baffle height
- K a :
-
Thermal Conchannelivity of air, W/mK
- L t :
-
Length of test section, m
- L v :
-
Length of V-pattern baffle, m
- D d /L v :
-
Relative discrete distance
- m a :
-
Mass flow rate of air, kg/s
- Nu :
-
Nusselt number
- Nu rs :
-
Nusselt number of rough surface
- Nu ss :
-
Nusselt number of smooth surface
- P B :
-
Pitch of baffle channel, m
- P B /H B :
-
Relative pitch ratio
- (∆ p ) d :
-
Pressure drop across test section, Pa
- (∆ p ) o :
-
Pressure drop across orifice plate, Pa
- Q u :
-
Useful heat gain, W
- Re:
-
Reynolds number of fluid
- T f :
-
Average temperature of air, K
- T i , T A1 :
-
Inlet temperature of air, K
- T o :
-
Outlet temperature of air, K
- T p :
-
Plate temperature of air, K
- U :
-
Mean air velocity, m/s
- V :
-
Velocity of air, m/s
- W D /H D :
-
Channel aspect ratio
- W D :
-
Width of channel, m
- W B :
-
Width of a single V-broken baffle, m
- W D /W B :
-
Relative baffle width
- SAH :
-
Solar air heater
- SAC:
-
Solar air channel
- α a :
-
Angle of attack,°
- β R :
-
Ratio of orifice meter to pipe diameter, dimensionless
- ρ a :
-
Density of air, kg/m 3
- ν a :
-
Kinematic viscosity of air, m 2/s
- η p :
-
Thermo-hydraulic performance
References
Khanoknaiyakarn C, Kwankaomeng S, Promvonge P (2011) Thermal performance enhancement in solar air heater channel with periodically v-shaped baffles. In: IEEE explore, International conference on utility exhibition on power and energy systems issues & prospectus for Asia, Sep
Ming L, Tariq SK, Ebrahim AH, Zahid AH (2016) Single phase heat transfer and pressure drop analysis of a dimpled enahnced tube. Appl Therm Eng 101:38–46
Sompol S, Pongjet P, Chinaruk T, Monsak P (2016) Thermal performance in solar air heater channel with combined wavy-groove and perforated delta wing vortex generator. Appl Therm Eng 100:611–620
Saini RP, Verma J (2008) Heat transfer and friction factor correlations for a duct having dimple shape artificial roughness for solar air heaters. Energy 33:1277–1287
Bekele A, Mishra M, Dutta S (2011) Effects of delta-shaped obstacles on the thermal performance of solar air heater. Advanced Mechanical Engineering 103:502
Chompookham T, Thianpong C, Kwankaomeng S, Promvonge P (2010) Heat transfer augmentation in a wedge ribbed duct using winglet vortex generators. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 37:163–169
Sahel D, Ameur H, Redouane B, Kamla Y (2016) Enhancement of heat transfer in a rectangular channel with perforated baffles. Appl Therm Eng 101:156–164
Promovong P (2010) Heat transfer and pressure drop in a duct with multiple 60° V baffle. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 37:835–840
Tang LH, Chu WX, Ahmed N, Zeng MA (2016) New configuration of winglet longitudinal vortex generator to enhance heat transfer in a Rectangular Channel. Appl Therm Eng 104:74–84
Promvong P, Sripattanapipat S, Tamna S, Kwankaomeng S, Thian C (2010) Numerically investigation of laminar heat transfer in a square duct with 45° inclined baffle. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 37:170–171
Sripattanapipat S, Promvonge P (2009) Numerical analysis of laminar heat transfer in a channel with diamond shaped baffles. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 36:32–38
Eiamsa-ard S, Wongcharee K, Eiamsa-ard P, Thianpong C (2010) Heat transfer enhancement in a tube using delta-winglet twisted tape insets. Appl Therm Eng 30:310–318
Nuntadusit C, Piya I, Wae-hayee M, Eiamsa-ard S (2015) Heat transfer characteristics in a channel fitted with zigzag-cut baffles. J Mech Sci Technol 29:2547–2554
Sriromreun P, Thianpong C, Promvonge P (2012) Experimental and numerical study on heat transfer enhancement in a duct with Z-shaped baffles. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 39:945–952
Nie JH, Chen YT, Hsieh HT (2009) Effect of a baffle on separated convection flow adjacent to backward-facing step. Int J Therm Sci 48:618–625
Karwa R, Maheshwari BK (2009) Heat transfer and friction in an asymmetrically heated rectangular duct with half and fully perforated baffles at different pitches. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 36:264–268
Shin S, Kawak JS (2008) Effect of hole shape on the heat transfer in a rectangular duct with perforated blockage walls. J Mech Sci Technol 22:1945–1951
Bopche SB, Tandale MS (2009) Experimental investigation on heat transfer and frictional characteristics of a turbulator roughened solar air heater duct. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:2834–2848
Romdhane BS (2007) The air solar collectors: comparative study, introduction of baffles to favor the heat transfer. Sol Energy 81:39–149
Lin CW (2006) Experimental study of thermal behaviour in a rectangular duct with baffles of pores. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 33:985–992
Skullong S, Thianpong C, Promvonge P (2016) Effects of rib size and arrangement on forced convective heat transfer in a solar air heater channel. Heat Mass Transf. doi:10.1007/s00231-015-1515-5
Karwa R, Maheshwari BK, Karwa N (2005) Experimental study of heat transfer enhancement in an asymmetrically heated rectangular duct with perforated baffles. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 32:275–284
Ary BKP, Lee MS, Ahn SW, Lee DH (2012) The effect of the inclined perforated baffle on heat transfer and flow patterns in the channel. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 39:1578–1583
Dutta P, Hossain A (2005) Internal cooling augmentation in rectangular duct using two inclined baffles. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 26:223–232
Chamoli S, Thakur NS (2013) Correlations for solar air heater duct with V-shaped perforated baffles as roughness elements on absorber plate. Int J Sustainable Energy 857318
Tamna S, Skullong S, Thianpong C, Promvonge P (2014) Heat transfer behaviour in solar air heater duct with multiple V baffle vortex generators. Sol Energy 110:720–735
Khanjian A, Habchi C, Russeil S, Bougeard D, Lemenand (2017) Effect of rectangular winglet pair roll angle on the heat transfer enhancement in laminar channel flow. Int J Therm Sci 114:1–14
Zhou G, Ye Q (2012) Experimental investigations of thermal and flow characteristics of curved trapezoidal winglet type vortex generators. Appl Therm Eng 37:241–248
ASHRAE Standard 93 (2003) Method of testing to determine the thermal performance of solar collectors. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta
Gnielinski V (1976) New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow. Int Chem Eng 16:359–368
Petukhov B (1970) Heat transfer and friction in turbulent pipe flow with variable physical properties. Adv Heat Tran 6:1565
Webb RL, Eckert ERG (1972) Application of rough surface to heat exchanger design. Int J Heat Mass Transf 15:1647–1658
Acknowledgements
We really thank the reviewers for constructive criticisms and valuable comments, which were of great help in revising the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: uncertainty analysis calculation
Appendix: uncertainty analysis calculation
Uncertainty is the possible numerical value of the error encountered during experimentation. The experimental value may differ from its true value due to presence of lot of factors which come into play during investigation. This deviation in the data of measured parameters from actual data is the uncertainty in measurement. The important parameters considered for the calculation of uncertainty are: mass flow rate, heat transfer coefficient, Nusselt number and friction factor etc. Uncertainty associated with instruments used in various measurements of parameters in the experiment is given in Table 6.
-
1.
Mass flow rate
$$ \dot{m}={C}_d\times {A}_o\times {\left[\frac{2.\rho .{\left(\Delta P\right)}_o}{1-{\psi}^4}\right]}^{0.5} $$$$ \dot{m}={C}_d\times {A}_o\times {\rho}^{0.5}\times {\left(\Delta P\right)}_o^{0.5}\times {\left[\frac{2}{1-{\psi}^4}\right]}^{0.5} $$$$ {\left[\frac{2}{1-{\beta}^4}\right]}^{0.5}= X= Cons \tan t $$$$ Then,\kern0.6em \dot{m}={XC}_d\;{A}_o{\rho}^{0.5}{\left(\Delta P\right)}_0^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta\;\dot{m}}{\delta\;{C}_d}={XA}_o{\rho}^{0.5}{\left(\Delta P\right)}_o^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\delta {A}_o}={XC}_d{\rho}^{0.5}{\left(\Delta P\right)}_o^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta \dot{m}}{{\delta \rho}_o}={XA}_o{C}_d0.5{\rho}^{-0.5}{\left(\Delta P\right)}_o^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\delta \left({\left(\Delta P\right)}_o\right)}={XA}_o{C}_d\rho 0.5{\left(\Delta P\right)}_o^{-0.5} $$$$ \delta \dot{m}={\left[{\left(\frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\delta {C}_d}\times \delta {C}_d\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\delta {A}_o}\times \delta {A}_o\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\delta \rho}\times \delta \rho \right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\delta {\left(\Delta P\right)}_o}\times \delta {\left(\Delta P\right)}_o\right)}^2\right]}^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta \dot{m}}{\dot{m}}={\left[{\left(\frac{\delta {C}_d}{C_d}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta {A}_o}{A_o}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta \rho}{\rho}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta {\left(\Delta P\right)}_o}{{\left(\Delta P\right)}_o}\right)}^2\right]}^{0.5} $$From calibration chart of orifice meter, the value of \( \frac{\delta {C}_d}{C_d} \)= 1.5%, the uncertainty in (ΔP)o, for U-tube manometer is 1 mm ΔP o = Δh o sin 90 = 100 × sin 90 = 100mm
$$ \frac{\delta\;\dot{m}}{\dot{m}}=1.73\% $$ -
2.
Heat transfer coefficient
$$ h=\frac{Q_u}{A_P.\left({T}_P-{T}_f\right)}\kern0.24em or\kern0.24em h=\frac{Q_u}{A_p.\Delta {T}_f} $$$$ \frac{\delta\;h}{h}={\left[{\left(\frac{\delta\;{Q}_u}{Q}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta {A}_p}{A_P}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta \left(\Delta {T}_f\right)}{\Delta {T}_f}\right)}^2\right]}^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta\;h}{h}=3.014\% $$ -
3.
Nusselt number
$$ Nu=\frac{hD}{K} $$$$ \frac{\delta Nu}{Nu}={\left[{\left(\frac{\delta h}{h}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta D}{D}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta K}{K}\right)}^2\right]}^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta Nu}{Nu}=3.2\% $$ -
4.
Friction factor
$$ {f}_r=\frac{2.{\left(\Delta P\right)}_d. D}{4.\rho . L.{V}^2} $$$$ \frac{\delta\;{f}_r}{f_r}={\left[{\left(\frac{\delta V}{V}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta \rho}{\rho}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta D}{D}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta L}{L}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{\delta {\left(\Delta P\right)}_d}{{\left(\Delta P\right)}_d}\right)}^2\right]}^{0.5} $$$$ \frac{\delta\;{f}_r}{f_r}=3.45\% $$
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Maithani, R. et al. An experimental study of heat transfer enhancement in an air channel with broken multi type V-baffles. Heat Mass Transfer 53, 3593–3612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2089-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2089-1