Skip to main content
Log in

Relative lung delivery of fluticasone propionate via large volume spacer or nebuliser in healthy volunteers

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: High-dose nebulised fluticasone propionate (FP) has been advocated for use in patients with severe persistent asthma. As there is complete first-pass inactivation of FP for the swallowed fraction, systemic absorption is due solely to its lung bioavailability. We wished to compare the relative lung delivery of FP, using adrenal suppression as a surrogate for the respirable dose, when administered via large volume spacer (FP-spacer) or nebuliser (FP-neb) in healthy adults. Methods: Fourteen healthy subjects, mean (SEM) age 29.4±2.6 years, were studied in a placebo-controlled, randomised study with three-way crossover design. Single nominal 2-mg doses of the following were given at 1700 hours in randomised sequence: a.

FP-spacer: fluticasone pressurised metered dose inhaler (as Flixotide 250 µg ex-valve per actuation), eight puffs via a primed Volumatic 750-ml spacerb.

FP-neb: (as Flixotide Nebule 2 mg/2 ml) via Pari LC Plus nebuliserc.

Placebo nebuliser Following each dose, measurements were made of corrected 0800-hours urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio (the primary outcome variable) and 0800-hours plasma cortisol. Results: Significant (P<0.05) suppression of both endpoints occurred only with FP-spacer, FP-neb being statistically no different from placebo. Geometric mean fold differences between FP-spacer and placebo were 9.8-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4, 28.8] for urinary cortisol/creatinine and 4.1-fold (95% CI 2.2, 7.5) for plasma cortisol. Comparing FP-spacer with FP-neb, these differences were 6.8-fold (95% CI 2.3, 20.0) for urinary cortisol/creatinine and 3.3-fold (95% CI 1.8, 6.0) for plasma cortisol. Conclusion: For a 2-mg labelled nominal dose of fluticasone, the spacer produced about a sevenfold higher relative lung dose than the nebuliser. This suggests that a very little of the labelled nebulised dose is respirable. Other factors such as patient preference, cost and compliance will determine the inhaler device that is chosen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted in revised form: 11 July 2001

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dempsey, O.J., Humphreys, M., Coutie, W.J. et al. Relative lung delivery of fluticasone propionate via large volume spacer or nebuliser in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 57, 637–641 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280100363

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280100363

Navigation