Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefepime in long-term hemodialysis with high-flux membranes

  • PHARMACOKINETICS AND DISPOSITION
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Among uremic patients on hemodialysis, infectious complications leading to a high incidence of morbidity and mortality are a well-documented problem. In this multi-dose study, the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of cefepime during high-flux hemodialysis were investigated and an improved dosing schedule is presented.

Methods: Six long-term hemodialysis patients received 2 g cefepime i.v. at the end of hemodialysis three times per week.

Results: Trough levels of cefepime were 23.3 ± 7.3 mg/l and peak serum concentrations 165.6 ± 48.7 mg/l. After 3.5 h of high-flux hemodialysis, 72.2 ± 6.4% of cefepime was eliminated. The intradialytic half-life was 1.6 ± 0.29 h and the interdialytic half-life 22.0 ± 2.14 h.

Conclusion: A dosage of 2 g cefepime after each hemodialysis session achieved drug levels well above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)90 for most of the target pathogens. Thus, the described dosing schedule is an efficient and cost saving antmicrobial therapy for severe infections in long-term hemodialysis patients with no residual renal function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 12 October 1999 / Accepted in revised from: 12 January 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmaldienst, S., Traunmüller, F., Burgmann, H. et al. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefepime in long-term hemodialysis with high-flux membranes. E J Clin Pharmacol 56, 61–64 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050721

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050721

Navigation