Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selective feeding of littoral harpacticoids on diatom algae: hungry gourmands?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied benthic harpacticoid grazing on diatom algae from two sites on the White Sea intertidal sandflat. Diatoms from sediments and from harpacticoid gut contents were sampled in situ, identified and counted, and grazing rates were calculated by two ways: (1) using potential daily ration estimations and (2) from the gut content and gut-residence time data. Paraleptastacus kliei did not contain any diatoms in the guts and presumably fed on other objects (bacteria or flagellates). Two other dominating species studied, Heterolaophonte minuta and Huntemannia jadensis, contained an average of 604 and 222 diatom cells per specimen. Diet composition differed significantly from the natural algal community. Two diatoms of intermediate cell size (Nitzschia palea var. debilis and Navicula sp.) contributed 92–97% of gut content for H. minuta and 58–81% for Hn. jadensis, whereas these diatoms amounted to only about 10% of biomass in native community. Mean consumption rates were estimated as 50–200 μg of wet biomass/day/cm2, so the harpacticoids grazed only between 3 and 11% of the total microalgae biomass per day. The grazing impact on the two preferred diatom populations, however, was much more intensive, 10–30% per day for Navicula sp. and 55–228% for N. palea. Therefore, native harpacticoid populations demonstrate highly selective feeding and could be strongly limited by their food in spite of seemingly plentiful total abundance of microphytobenthos. This disproportionally high grazing pressure upon some species apparently could affect the structure of microalgae communities resulting in low relative abundance of mid-sized forms. We hypothesize that a very dynamic spatio-temporal distribution of epibenthic harpacticoids (short-living micropatches) may be the possible adaptation to such local food limitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolmasova GI (1976) Feeding and the elements of energy balance of Gammarus olivii M.-Edw. From the Blask Sea (in Russian). Biologija Morja (Kiev) 37:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rezq TS, Yule AB, Teng SK (1997) Ingestion, fecundity, growth rates and culture of the harpacticoid copepod, Tisbe furcata, in the laboratory. Hydrobiologia 347:109—118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Admiraal W, Bouwman LA, Hoekstra L, Romeyn K (1983) Qualitative and quantitative interactions between microphytobenthos and herbivorous meiofauna on a brackish intertidal mudflat. Int Revue Ges Hydrobiol 68:175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armonies W (1989) Meiofauna emergence from intertidal sediment measured in the field: significant contribution to nocturnal planktonic biomass in shallow water. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 43:29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Azovsky AI, Chertoprood ES (2003) Spatio-temporal dynamics of the White Sea littoral harpacticoid community. Oceanology 43:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Azovsky AI, Chertoprood ES, Saburova MA, Polikarpov IG (2004) Spatio-temporal variability of micro- and meiobenthic communities in the White Sea intertidal sandflat. Est Coast Shelf Sci 60:663–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bascompte J, Solè RV (1995) Rethinking complexity: modelling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 10:361–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer JE, Montagna PA, Spies RB, Prieto MC, Hardin D (1988) Microbial biogeochemistry and heterotrophy in sediments of a marine hydrocarbon seep. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1493–1513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard GF (1990) Overlapping microscale dispersion patterns of meiofauna and microphytobenthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 68:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard GF (1991) Measurement of meiofauna grazing rates on microphytobenthos: Is primary production a limiting factor? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 147:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TJ, Siebert JR (1977) Food of some benthic harpacticoid copepods. J Fish Res Bd Can 34:1028–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffan-Dubau E, Carman KR (2000) Diel feeding behavior of meiofauna and their relationships with microalgal resources. Limnol Oceanogr 45:381–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkovsky IV (1992) Structural and functional organization and stability of marine benthic communities (in Russian). Moscow State University Press, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman KR (1990a) Mechanisms of uptake of radioactive labels by meiobenthic copepods during grazing experiments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 68:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman KR (1990b) Radioactive labeling of a natural assemblage of marine sedimentary bacteria and microalgae for trophic studies: an autoradiographic study. Microb Ecol 19:279–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carman KR, Thistle D (1985) Microbial food partitioning by three species of benthic copepods. Mar Biol 88:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman KR, Dobbs FC, Guckert JB (1989) Comparison of three techniques for administering radiolabeled substrates to sediments for trophic studies: Uptake of label by harpacticoid copepods. Mar Biol 102:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman KR, Fleeger JW, Pomarico SM (1997) Response of a benthic food web to hydrocarbon contamination. Limnol Oceanogr 42:561–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler GT, Fleeger JW (1984) Tube-building by a marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod. Mar Biol 82:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chepurnov VA (1987) On the role of benthic diatom algae in feeding of harpacticoids (Copepoda) (in Russian). Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal 66(7):1005–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepurnov VA (1988) Benthic diatom algae and harpacticoids of the Black Sea shallow waters near the Karadag and their trophic relations (in Russian). PhD Thesis. Institute of biology of southern seas

  • Chertoprood ES, Azovsky AI (2005) Seasonal population dynamics of the White Sea littoral harpacticoids (Harpacticoida: Copepoda). Oceanology 45 (in press)

  • Chislenko LL (1968) Nomograms for weight estimation of water organisms by their body size and form (in Russian). Nauka, Leningrad, 105 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Decho AW (1986) Water-cover influences on diatom ingestion rates by meiobenthic copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 33:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decho AW, Castenholz RW (1986) Spatial patterns and feeding of meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods to resident microbial flora. Hydrobiologia 131:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decho AW, Fleeger JW (1988) Microscale dispersion of meiobenthic copepods in response to food-resource patchiness. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 118:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman K, Valiela I, Sarda R (1995) Controls of benthic marine food webs. Sci Mar 59(suppl 1):119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost BW (1972) Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol Oceanogr 17:805–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee JM, Warwick RM (1984) Preliminary observations on the metabolic and reproductive strategies of harpacticoid copepods from an intertidal sandflat. Hydrobiology 118:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruzov LN (1986a) Onthogenetic ration changes of some representatives of the family Calanidae (Copepoda) consuming food of various size (in Russian). Oceanology 26(4):684–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzov LN (1986b) “Supporting” concentration of food and its possible calculation according to age and ecological characteristics of some species of Calanidae family (Copepoda) (in Russian). Oceanology 26(5):824–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie CG, Moorhead DL (2002) Density-dependent habitat selection: evaluating isoleg theory with a Lotka-Volterra model. Oikos 97:184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of fragmented landscapes. Nature 404:755–758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks GR (1988) Evolutionary implications of swimming behavior in meiobenthic copepods. Hydrobiologia 167/168:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks GR, Coull BC (1983) The ecology of marine meiobenthic copepods. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 21:67–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Dürselen C-D, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T (1999) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35:403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huis R (1992) The amphiatlanthic distribution of Leptastacus macronyx (Scott, 1892) (Copepoda: Harpacticoida): a paradigm of taxonomic confusion; and a cladistic approarch to the Leptastacidae Lang, 1948. Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Akademie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van Belgie 54:21–196

  • Ivester MS, Coull BC (1977) Niche fractionation studies of two sympatric species of Enhydrosoma (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). MikrofaunaMeeresboden 61:137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev VS (1945) The biological productivity of waters. Usp Sovr Biol 19:98–120 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint IR, Gee JM, Warwick RM (1982) Determination of fine-scale vertical distribution of microbes and meiofauna in an intertidal sediment. Mar Biol 72:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JJ, Tietjen JH, Mastropaolo C, Rubin H (1977) Food quality and the heterogenous spatial distribution of meiofauna. Helg Wiss Meeresunters 30:272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre HL, Geider RJ, Miller DC (1996) Microphytobenthos: The ecological role of the “Secret Garden” of unvegetated, shallow-water marine habitats. I. Distribution, Abundance and primary production. Estuaries 19:186–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazei YA, Burkovsky IV, Saburova MA, Polikarpov IG, Stolyarov AP (2001) Trophic structure of psammophilous ciliate community in the Chernaya River estuary (in Russian). Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal 80:1283–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Moens T, Verbeeck L, Vincx M (1999) Preservation and incubation time-induced bias in tracer-aided grazing studies on meiofauna. Mar Biol 133:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna PA (1984) In situ measurement of meiobenthic grazing rates on sediment bacteria and edaphic diatoms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 18:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna PA (1995) Rates of metazoan meiofaunal microbivory: a review. Vie Melieu 45:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna PA, Bauer JE, Hardin D, Spies RB (1995a) Meiofaunal and microbial trophic interactions in a natural submarine hydrocarbon seep. Vie Milieu 45:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna PA, Blanchard GF, Dinet A (1995b) Effect of production and biomass of intertidal microphytobenthos on meiofaunal grazing rates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 185:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JD (1993) Mathematical biology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons TP, Takahashi M, Hargrave B (1984) Biological oceanographic processes, 3rd edn. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Penry DL, Frost BW (1991) Chlorophyll a degradation by Calanus pacificus: Dependence on ingestion rate and digestive acclimation to food resources. Limnol Oceanogr 36:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinckney J, Sandulli R (1990) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of meiofaunal and microalgal populations on an intertidal sandflat: Scale linkage between consumers and resources. Est Coastal Shelf Sci 30:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto CSC, Souza-Santos LP, Santos PJP (2001) Development and population dynamics of Tisbe biminiensis Copepoda: Harpacticoida reared on different diets. Aquaculture 198:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polikarpov IG, Saburova MA (1990) Growth of the benthic microalgae on interstitial water from the reducing zone of littoral sediments (in Russian). Proc Acad Sci USSR 310:253–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieper M (1982) Feeding preferences of marine harpacticoid copepods for various species of bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybnikov PV, Kondar’ DV, Azovsky AI (2003) Properties of the White Sea littoral sediments and their influence on the fauna and distribution of Harpacticoida. Oceanology 43:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Saburova MA, Polikarpov IG, Burkovsky IV (1995) Spatial structure of an intertidal sandflat microphytobenthic community as related to different spatial scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 129:214–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saburova MA, Polikarpov IG, Burkovsky IV, Mazei YA (2001) Macroscale distribution of interstitial microphytobenthos in the Chernaya River estuary (Kandalaksha Bay, the White sea) (in Russian). Ecologia Morja 58:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos PJP, Castel J, Souza-Santos LP (1995) Microphytobenthic patches and their influence on meiofaunal distribution. Cah Biol Mar 36:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvarts EA (2004) Conservation of biodiversity: communities and ecosystems. KMK Scientific, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Santos LP (1996) Contribution a l’etude de la biologie nutritionelle des copepodes meiobenthiques: cycles d’ingestion, role des bacteries et des diatomees dans le regime alimentaire, budget energetique. These de Doctorat, Universite Bordeaux I, Bordeaux France

  • SundbäcK, Nilsson P, Nilsson C, Jönsson B (1996) Balance between autotrophic and heterotrophic components and processes in microbenthic communities of sandy sediments: a field study. Est Coast Shelf Sci 43:689–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suschenja LM (1972) Crustacian respiration intensity (in Russian). “Naukova Dumka”, Kiev

  • Suschenja LM, Hmeleva NN (1967) Food consumption by crustaceans as function of body weight (in Russian). Proc Acad Sci USSR 176:1428–1431

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JT (1978) Scanning electron microscope investigation of feeding habits and mouthpart structures of three species of copepods of the family Pontellidae. Bull Mar Sci 28:487–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Udalov AA, Butkovsky IV, Mokievsky VO, Stolyarov AP, Mazei Ya, Saburova MA, Chertoprood MV, Chertoprood ES, Ilyinsky VV, Kolobov MY, Ponomarev SA (2004) Changes of the general characteristics of micro-, meio- and macrobenthos along a salinity gradient in the White Sea estuary. Oceanology 44:549–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustach JF (1982) Algae, bacteria and detritus as food for the harpacticoid copepod, Heteropsillus pseudonunni Coull and Palmer. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 64:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Berghe W, Bergmans M (1981) Differential food preferences in three co-occurring species of Tisbe (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaika VE (1983) Comparative productivity of hydrobionts (in Russian). “Naukova Dumka”, Kiev

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Filipp Sapozhnikov for the assistance in diatom identification. This research was supported by the Russian Fund of Basic Researches (grant Nos. 03–04–48018 and 04–05–64734).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hydrobiology, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Vorob‘evy Gory, 119899, Moscow, Russia

    A. I. Azovsky & E. S. Chertoprood

  2. A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Pr. Nakhimova, 2, 99011, Sevastopol, Ukraine

    M. A. Saburova & I. G. Polikarpov

Authors
  1. A. I. Azovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Saburova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. S. Chertoprood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. G. Polikarpov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Azovsky.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azovsky, A.I., Saburova, M.A., Chertoprood, E.S. et al. Selective feeding of littoral harpacticoids on diatom algae: hungry gourmands?. Marine Biology 148, 327–337 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0086-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0086-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation