Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating zooplankton biomass through image analysis

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zooplankton biomass can be reliably estimated by a non-destructive method based on the statistical relationship between biovolume and the contents of carbon and nitrogen. Integrated zooplankton biovolume and the corresponding organic C and N contents were analysed in paired fresh and fixed (hexamine-buffered formalin) samples. Sample biovolume was estimated through the integration of individual volumes obtained by semi-automatic image analysis on fixed zooplankton samples. The corresponding C and N contents of paired fresh and preserved zooplankton were analysed with a Carlo-Erba C-H-N Analyser. The method allows simultaneous measurement of integrated and individual numbers and biomass (biovolume, C and N) spectrum. It is non-destructive and allows the minimization of errors and variability attributable to differences in the handling processes of samples and to the presence of particles other than zooplankton, like phytoplankton or detritus particulate matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4A–D.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlstrom EH, Thrailkill JR (1962) Plankton volume loss with time of preservation. CALCOFI Rep 9:57–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz M (1985) Vertical distribution of zooplankton biomass during summer stratification in the western Mediterranean. In: Gibbs PE (ed) Proceedings of the 19th EMBS. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 135–143

  • Alcaraz M (1988) Summer zooplankton metabolism and its relation to primary production in the western Mediterranean. In: Minas HJ, Nival P (eds) Océanographie pélagique méditerranéene. Oceanol Acta 9 (Spec. Issue):185–191

  • Alcaraz M, Saiz E, Fernández JA, Trepat I, Figueiras F, Calbet A, Bautista B (1998) Antactic zooplankton metabolism: carbon requirements and ammonium excretion of salps and crustacean zooplankton in the vicinity of the Bransfield Strait during January 1994. J Mar Syst 17:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Båmstedt U (1974) biochemical studies on the deep-water pelagic community of Korsfjorden, western Norway. Methodology and sampling design. Sarsia 56:71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers JR (1976) Determination of zooplankton biomass. In: Steedman HF (ed) Zooplankton fixation and preservation. UNESCO Press, Paris, pp 35–84

  • Billones RG, Tackx MLM, Flachier AT, Zhu L, Daro MN (1999) Image analysis as a tool for measuring particulate matter concentration and gut content, body size, and clearance rates of estuarine copepods: validation and application. J Mar Syst 22:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böttger R, Schnack D (1986) On the effect of formaldehyde fixation on the dry weight of copepods. Meeresforschung 31:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Calbet A, Garrido S, Saiz E, Alcaraz M, Duarte C (2001) Annual zooplankton succession in coastal NW Mediterranean waters: the importance of smaller size fractions. J Plankton Res 23:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calbet A, Broglio E, Saiz E, Alcaraz M (2002) Low grazing impact of mesozooplankton on the microbial communities of the Alboran Sea: a possible case of inhibitory effects by the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum. Aquat Microb Ecol 26:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner EDS, Davies AG (1971) Plankton as a factor in the nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in the sea. Adv Mar Biol 9:101–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing DH, Humprey GH, Banse K, Laevatsu T (1958) Report of the committee on terms and equivalents. Rapp P V. Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 144:15–16

  • Dennett MR, Caron DA (2002) Video plankton recorder reveals high abundances of colonial Radiolaria in surface waters of the central North Pacific. J Plankton Res 24:797–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada M, Margalef R (1988) Supply of nutrients to the Mediterranean photic zone along a persistent front. In: Minas HJ, Nival P (eds) Océanographie pélagique méditerranéene. Oceanol Acta 9 (Spec. Issue):133–142

  • Gilabert J (2001) Seasonal plankton dynamics in a Mediterranean hypersaline coastal lagoon: the Mar Menor. J Plankton Res 23:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday NC (2001) A comparison of morphometric and geometric methods for estimation of individual zooplankton volumes. Sarsia 86:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman AW, Mitchell MR (1981) Counting and identifying copepod species with an in situ electronic zoplankton counter. Deep Sea Res 28:739–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries HP, Berman MS, Poularikas AD, Katsinis C, Melas I, Sherman K, Bivins L (1984) Automated sizing, counting and identification of zooplankton by pattern recognition. Mar Biol 78:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez F, Rodriguez J, Bautista B, Rodriguez V (1987) Relations between chlorophyll, phytoplankton cell abundance and biovolume during a winter bloom in Mediterranean coastal waters. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 105:161–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lam Hoai T (1991) Zooplankton counted by image analysis and size frequency distributions in a coastal lagoon. Arch Hydrobiol 121:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Borgne R (1975) Équivalences entre les mesures de biovolume, poids secs, poids sec sans cendre, carbone, azote et phosphore du mésozooplancton de l'Atlantique tropical. Cah ORSTOM, Ser Oceanogr 13:179–196

  • Milligan TG (1996) In situ particle (flock) size measurements with the benthos 373 plankton silhouette camera. J Sea Res 36:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Omori M (1978) Some factors affecting on dry weight, organic weight and concentration of carbon and nitrogen in freshly prepared and in preserved zooplankton. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 63:261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Omori M, Ikeda T (1984) Methods in marine zooplankton ecology. Wiley, New York

  • Ortner PB, Cummings SR, Aftring RP (1979) Silhouette photography of oceanic zooplankton. Nature 277:50–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel L, Fock H, Hagen W (2000) Biomass and abundance. In: Harris RP, Wiebe PH, Lenz J, Skjoldal HR, Huntley M (eds) ICES zooplankton methodology manual. Academic Press, London, pp 83–192

  • Raymont JEG, Austin J, Lindford E (1964) Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton. I. The biochemical composition of Neomysis integer. J Cons Int Explor Mer 28:354–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker WE (1973) Linear regression in fishery research. J Fish Res Bd Can 30:409–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J, Jimenez F, Bautista B, Rodriguez V (1987) Planktonic biomass spectra dynamics during a winter production pulse in Mediterranean coastal waters. J Plankton Res 9:1183–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff JC, Hopcroft RR (1986) High precision microcomputer based measuring system for ecological research. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:2044–2048

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolke M, Lenz J (1984) Size structure analysis of zooplankton samples by means of an automated image analyzing system. J Plankton Res 6:637–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiz E, Calbet A, Irigoien X, Alcaraz M (1999) Copepod egg production in the western Mediterranean: response to food availability in oligotrophic environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 187:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathmann RR (1967) Estimating the organic carbon content of phytoplankton from cell volume or plasma volume. Limnol Oceanogr 12:411–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe P (1988) Functional regression equations for zooplankton displacement volume, wet weight, dry weight, and carbon: a correction. Fish Bull 86:833–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe P, Boyd S, Cox JL (1975) Relationships between zooplankton displacement volume, wet weight, dry weight, and carbon. Fish Bull 73:777–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R, Robins DB (1982) Effects of preservation on wet weight, dry weight, nitrogen and carbon content of Calanus helgolandicus (Crustacea: Copepoda). Mar Biol 71:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Yentsch CS, Hebard JF (1957) A gauge for determining plankton volume by the mercury immersion method. J Cons 22:184–190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to all the participants of cruises "Varimed" and "Hivern" on board the R.V. "Garcia del Cid", "Incoceano" on board the R.V. "Cornide de Saavedra" and "Mater" on board the R.V. "Hespérides". The comments of three unknown referees contributed to improving the manuscript. M. Parisi and X. Ramírez provided technical assistance. The study has been financially supported by Spanish grants (AMB93-0728, AMB94-1019, MAR95-1901-C03-03, MAR98-0854, MAR98-0932 and REN2001-1693) from the CICYT (Spanish Commission for Science and Technology), and international grants (MAS2-CT93-0063, EVK3-CT-2000-00022, and EVK3-1999-00015) from the European Union. ELOISE contribution № 375/40. A.C. was funded by a "Ramón y Cajal" post doctoral contract, and I.B. by the pre-doctoral fellowship PN98 01344611, both from the Ministry of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Alcaraz.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alcaraz, M., Saiz, E., Calbet, A. et al. Estimating zooplankton biomass through image analysis. Marine Biology 143, 307–315 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-003-1094-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-003-1094-8

Keywords

Navigation