Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Quantitative Cancellous Bone Connectivity Analyses at Two- and Three-Dimensional Levels in Dialysis Patients

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of cancellous bone connectivity has the potential to aid in predicting fracture risk. Today, cancellous bone connectivity is generally assessed using bone sections obtained from biopsy. However, how reliably such two-dimensional (2-D) analyses visualize the 3-D properties has not been evaluated. Biopsied iliac bone samples were obtained from 47 chronic hemodialysis patients. Bone samples were observed using a microfocus X-ray computed tomography (μCT) system en bloc, and the cancellous bone microstructure was quantitatively assessed at both the 2- and 3-D levels. Cancellous bone microarchitecture was successfully reconstructed from the data obtained by the μCT system. Most of the results from node-strut analysis (NSA) revealed no statistically significant correlations between the 2- and 3-D analyses, with the exception that the number of nodes (N.Nd/TV) showed a mild but significant correlation. In contrast, the marrow space star volumes (V*m) of the 2- and 3-D analyses were highly correlated. NSA parameters including N.Nd/TV showed significant correlations with V*m at the 3-D level. In conclusion, V*m values were similar in the 2- and 3-D analyses, while most of the 2-D NSA parameters did not reflect the 3-D ones. Since V*m and most of the NSA parameters were correlated in the 3-D analyses, 2-D NSA would seem to have serious limitations for the assessment of cancellous bone microstructural properties. Further studies will thus be needed to establish appropriate methods for assessing cancellous bone connectivity in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalle Carbonare L, Giannini S (2004) Bone microarchitecture as an important determinant of bone strength. J Endocrinol Invest 27:99–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parfitt AM (1992) Implications of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fracture. Bone 13(Suppl 2):S41–S47

    Google Scholar 

  3. Majumdar S, Link TM, Augat P et al (1999) Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 10:231–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortet B, Dubois P, Boutry N et al (2000) Does high resolusion computed tomography image analysis of the distal radius provide imformation independent of bone mass? J Clin Densitom 3:339–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garrahan NJ, Mellishi RWE, Compston JE (1986) A new method for the two-dimensional analysis of bone structure in human iliac crest biopsies. J Microsc 142:341–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Compston JE, Mellish RWE, Garrahan NJ (1987) Age-related changes in iliac crest trabecular microanatomic bone structure in man. Bone 8:289–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vesterby A, Gundersen HJG, Melsen F (1989) Star volume of marrow space and trabeculae of the first lumbar vertebra: sampling efficiency and biological variation. Bone 10:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borah B, Dufresne TE, Chemielewski PA et al (2004) Residronate preserves bone architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as measured by three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. Bone 34:736–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazama JJ, Gejyo F, Ejiri S et al (1993) Application of confocal laser scanning microscopy to the observation of bone biopsy specimens. Bone 14:885–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R (1996) A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 58:24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Odgard A (1997) Three-dimensional method for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Architect 20:315–327

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nango N, Endo N, Yamamoto T et al (2007) Evaluation of vertebrae fragility by osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 22(Suppl 1):S480

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kazama JJ, Iwasaki Y, Yamato H et al (2003) Microfocus computed tomography analysis of early changes in bone microstructure in rats with chronic renal failure. Nephron Exp Nephrol 95:e152–e157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito M, Ejiri S, Jinnai H et al (2003) Bone structure and mineralization demonstrated using synchrotron radiation computed tomography (SR-CT) in animal models: preliminary findings. J Bone Miner Metab 21:287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guggenbuhl P, Bodic F, Hamel L et al (2006) Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs of iliac bone is correlated with bone micro-CT. Osteoporos Int 17:447–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vukmirovic-Popovic S, Colterjohn N, Lhotak S et al (2002) Morphological, histomorphometric, and microstructural alterations in human bone metastasis from breast carcinoma. Bone 31:529–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortet B, Dubois P, Bountry N et al (2002) Computed tomography image analysis of the calcaneus in male osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:33–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miki T, Nakatsuka K, Naka H et al (2004) Effect and safety of intermittent weekly administration of human parathyroid hormone 1–34 in patients with primary osteoporosis evaluated by histomorphometry and microstructural analysis of iliac trabecular bone before and after 1 year of treatment. J Bone Miner Metab 22:569–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mellish RWE, Ferguson-Pell MW, Cochran GVB et al (1991) A new manual method for assessing two-dimensional cancellous bone structure: comparison between iliac crest and lumbar vertebra. J Bone Miner Res 6:689–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chappard D, Legrand D, Pascaretti C et al (1999) Comparison of eight histomorphometric methods for measuring trabecular bone architecture by image analysis on histologic sections. Microsc Res Tech 45:303–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by research grants from ROD21 research foundation and the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas, 18018017, 2007 (to J. J. Kazama) and for Exploratory Research, 17659254, 2007 (to I. Narita).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichiro James Kazama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazama, J.J., Koda, R., Yamamoto, S. et al. Comparison of Quantitative Cancellous Bone Connectivity Analyses at Two- and Three-Dimensional Levels in Dialysis Patients. Calcif Tissue Int 84, 38–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-008-9194-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-008-9194-6

Keywords

Navigation