Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Automated Algorithm to Detect the Trabecular-Cortical Bone Interface in Micro-Computed Tomographic Images

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micro-computed tomography (microCT) has become a standard tool for the evaluation of bone morphology in preclinical studies. Unfortunately, the user-dependent definition of contour lines that separate trabecular from cortical bone is not only extremely time-consuming but may also represent a source of data bias and increased variability. Here, an automated image segmentation technique was developed and tested over a large range of bone phenotypes. The principal steps of the algorithm involve blurring, segmentation at different thresholds, and volumetric component labeling to first identify the periosteal edge and then create a cortical mask, the inner edge of which defines the trabecular-cortical interface. The algorithm was tested against (1) eight skilled microCT operators who manually defined the trabecular bone within the distal femur of four adult mice as well as (2) contour lines drawn by a single user in femurs from 71 rodents. Across the four femurs, the coefficient of variation between users was 9% for bone volume fraction, 13% for connectivity density, and 3% for trabecular thickness. Morphometric data produced by the algorithm were within 2% of the mean values of the eight operators. Across the 71 femurs, the slope and intercept of the regressions between morphometric automatic and user data were, with the exception of trabecular thickness, not significantly different from 1 and 0, respectively. Because of the excellent match with the current gold-standard technique, this algorithm may present a valuable tool for the standardized and automated evaluation of bone morphology without the time-consuming task of drawing contour lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkenhager-Frenkel DH, Courpron P, Hupscher EA, Clermonts E, Coutinho MF, Schmitz PI, Meunier PJ (1988) Age-related changes in cancellous bone structure. A two-dimensional study in the transiliac and iliac crest biopsy sites. Bone Miner 4:197–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M (1989) The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:3–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller R, Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1994) Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. Phys Med Biol 39:145–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R (1996) A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 58:24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Judex S, Boyd S, Qin YX, Turner S, Ye K, Muller R, Rubin C (2003) Adaptations of trabecular bone to low magnitude vibrations result in more uniform stress and strain under load. Ann Biomed Eng 31:12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Judex S, Garman R, Squire M, Donahue LR, Rubin C (2004) Genetically based influences on the site-specific regulation of trabecular and cortical bone morphology. J Bone Miner Res 19:600–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Judex S, Lei X, Han D, Rubin C (2006) Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude. J Biomech 40:1333–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulrich D, Hildebrand T, Van Rietbergen B, Muller R, Ruegsegger P (1997) The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing. Stud Health Technol Inform 40:97–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, Van Der Perre G, Dequeker J, Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1998) Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 23:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dufresne T (1998) Segmentation techniques for analysis of bone by three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging. Technol Health Care 6:351–359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laib A, Barou O, Vico L, Lafage-Proust MH, Alexandre C, Rugsegger P (2000) 3D micro-computed tomography of trabecular and cortical bone architecture with application to a rat model of immobilisation osteoporosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:326–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hildebrand T, Laib A, Muller R, Dequeker J, Ruegsegger P (1999) Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 14:1167–1174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1997) Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1:15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Odgaard A, Gundersen HJ (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14:173–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dewitte K, Fierens C, Stockl D, Thienpont LM (2002) Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. Clin Chem 48:799–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scott LE, Galpin JS, Glencross DK (2003) Multiple method comparison: statistical model using percentage similarity. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 54:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding by NASA, NSBRI, and NSF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank the eight microCT operators for drawing contour lines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Judex.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lublinsky, S., Ozcivici, E. & Judex, S. An Automated Algorithm to Detect the Trabecular-Cortical Bone Interface in Micro-Computed Tomographic Images. Calcif Tissue Int 81, 285–293 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-007-9063-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-007-9063-8

Keywords

Navigation