Skip to main content
Log in

The functional body: does body representation reflect functional properties?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the distortions of body representation in healthy population and most studies have focused their attention on specific parts of the body, such as the hands. Only three studies have considered the representation of the body as a whole. Findings, acquired by different means of assessment methods, are partially contrasting, leading to different interpretations. The present study aims to investigate which aspects of body representation can be preserved regardless of the method adopted and whether current and previous findings can be explained by a unique theoretical model. In Experiments 1a and 1b, we adopted a modified version of the Body Image Task to investigate body representations in real scale and the relationship of its parts. Participants judged the location of body landmarks by pointing on their own silhouette imagined on a wall in front of them. In Experiment 2, we investigated (i) whether the pattern of distortions observed in the first experiment are maintained across different methods by asking participants to estimate the veracity and proportionality of the length of their own body parts; and (ii) whether similar distortions can be generalized to stereotypical representations. Overall, we observed a consistent pattern of distortions, whereby upper body limbs are underestimated and lower parts of the body are overestimated across all experiments and conditions. These findings are then interpreted as the result of a functional relationship between body parts and daily actions, which underlie a close modulation of body schema and body image. This interpretation offers a reconciliation of seemingly contradictory findings in the literature and supports to the co-construction model (Pitron et al. in Conscious Cognit 65:352–358, 2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambroziak KB, Tamè L, Longo MR (2018) Conceptual distortions of hand structure are robust to changes in stimulus information. Conscious Cogn 61:107–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anema HA, van Zandvoort MJ, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, Dijkerman HC (2009) A double dissociation between somatosensory processing for perception and action. Neuropsychologia 47(6):1615–1620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnhoff FN, Mehl MC (1963) Body image deterioration in paraplegia. J Nervous Mental Disorders 137:88–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassolino M, Finisguerra A, Canzoneri E, Serino A, Pozzo T (2015) Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations. Neuropsychologia 70:385–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G, Aglioti S (2010) The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Exp Brain Res 200(1):25–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brozzoli C, Makin TR, Cardinali L, Holmes NP, Farnè A (2012) Peripersonal space: a multisensory interface for body-object interactions. In: Murray MM, Wallace MT (eds) The neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, p 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Brozzoli C, Ehrsson HH, Farnè A (2014) Multisensory representation of the space near the hand: from perception to action and individual interactions. Neuroscientist 20:122–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce V, Young A (1998) In the eye of the beholder: the science of face perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB (2001) Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: evidence from autotopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychol 18:289–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri E, Ubaldi S, Rastelli V, Finisguerra A, Bassolino M, Serino A (2013) Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Exp Brain Res 228(1):25–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinali L, Frassinetti F, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Roy AC, Farnè A (2009a) Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Curr Biol 19(12):R478–R479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinali L, Brozzoli C, Farnè A (2009b) Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept? Brain Topogr 21:252–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchini G, Galligan T, Mora L, Kuhn G (2018) The magic hand: effect of expertise on representation of own hand. Q J Exp Psychol 71(11):2314–2324

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Scorolli C, Borghi AM (2011) When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychon Bull Rev 18:302–308. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo M, di Pellegrino G, Seriani S, Gallina P, Frassinetti F (2018) The sense of agency shapes body schema and peripersonal space. Sci Rep 8(1):13847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32238-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont F (2010) Body schema and body image—Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48(3):669–680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont F (2018) Mind the body. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont F, Majid A, Jola C, Haggard P (2009) Segmenting the body into parts: evidence from biases in tactile perception. Q J Exp Psychol 62(3):500–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802000802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkerman HC, de Haan EH (2007) Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 30:189–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 31: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti G (2016) Through the forest of motor representations. Conscious Cogn 43:177–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes CT, Longo MR, Haggard P (2013a) Body image distortions in healthy adults. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 144:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes CT, Pazzaglia M, Longo MR, Scivoletto G, Haggard P (2013b) Body image distortions following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(2):201–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S (1986) Body image and body schema: a conceptual clarification. J Mind Behav 7:541–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganea N, Longo MR (2017) Projecting the self outside the body: body representations underlying proprioceptive imagery. Cognition 162:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head H, Holmes G (1911) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34:102–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes NP, Spence C (2004) The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn Process 5:94–105

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine KR, McCarty K, McKenzie KJ, Pollet TV, Cornelissen KK, Tovée MJ, Cornelissen PL (2019) Distorted body image influences body schema in individuals with negative bodily attitudes. Neuropsychologia 122:38–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47:204–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR (1988) Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 111:281–297

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linkenauger SA, Wong HY, Geuss M, Stefanucci JK, McCulloch KC, Bülthoff HH, Mohler BJ, Proffitt DR (2015) The perceptual homunculus: the perception of the relative proportions of the human body. J Exp Psychol Gen 144(1):103–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR (2016) Types of body representation. In: Coello Y, Fischer MH (eds) Foundations of embodied cognition: Perceptual and emotional embodiment, vol 1. Routledge, London, pp 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Haggard P (2010) An implicit body representation underlying human position sense. PNAS Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11727–11732. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003483107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Haggard P (2011) Weber’s illusion and body shape: anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:720–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Haggard P (2012a) A 2.5-D representation of the human hand. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38:9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Haggard P (2012b) Implicit body representations and the conscious body image. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 141:164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Azañón E, Haggard P (2010) More than skin deep: body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia 48(3):655–668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini F, Longo MR, Iannetti GD, Haggard P (2011) A supramodal representation of the body surface. Neuropsychologia 49:1194–1201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mora L, Cowie D, Banissy MJ, Cocchini G (2018) My true face: unmasking one’s own face representation. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 191:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy B (1980) The will: a dual aspect theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitron V, de Vignemont F (2017) Beyond differences between the body schema and the body image: insights from body hallucinations. Conscious Cogn 53:115–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitron A, Alsmith A, de Vignemont F (2018) How do the body schema and the body image interact? Conscious Cogn 65(2018):352–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1998) The perception of phantom limbs. Brain 121:1603–1630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL, McGoldrick JE, Shackelford R, Fidopiastis C (2004) Are human bodies represented differently from other animate and inanimate objects? Vis Cognit 11:523–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL, Stone VE, Grubb JD, McGoldrick JE (2006) Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32(1):73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romano D, Uberti E, Caggiano P, Cocchini G, Maravita A (2018) Different tool training induces specific effects on body metric representation. Exp Brain Res 237(2):493–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sadibolova R, Ferrè ER, Linkenauger SA, Longo MR (2019) Distortions of perceived volume and length of body parts. Cortex 111:74–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwoebel J, Coslett HB (2005) Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J Cognit Neurosci 17:543–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirigu A, Grafman J, Bressler K, Sunderland T (1991) Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain 114:629–642

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek S, Wehmeier PM, Remschmidt H (2001) Body image assessment using body size estimation in recent studies on anorexia nervosa. A brief review. Euro Child Adolesc Psychiatry 10:215–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sposito A, Bolognini N, Vallar G, Maravita A (2012) Extension of perceived arm length following tool-use: clues to plasticity of body metrics. Neuropsychologia 50(9):2187–2194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamè L, Bumpus N, Linkenauger SA, Longo MR (2017) Distorted body representations are robust to differences in experimental instructions. Atten Percept Psychophys 79:1204–1216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We like to thank Dr. Guido Org for providing the ‘avatar’ stimuli and Dr. Rebekah Jamieson-Craig for proof-reading our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Caggiano.

Additional information

Communicated by Francesco Lacquaniti.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caggiano, P., Cocchini, G. The functional body: does body representation reflect functional properties?. Exp Brain Res 238, 153–169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05705-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05705-w

Keywords

Navigation