Skip to main content
Log in

Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that after reaching with misaligned visual feedback of the hand, one adapts his or her reaches and partially recalibrates proprioception, such that sense of felt hand position is shifted to match the seen hand position. However, to date, this has only been demonstrated in the right (dominant) hand following reach training with a visuomotor distortion in which the rotated cursor distortion was introduced gradually. As reach adaptation has been shown to differ depending on how the distortion is introduced (gradual vs. abrupt), we sought to examine proprioceptive recalibration following reach training with a cursor that was abruptly rotated 30° clockwise relative to hand motion. Furthermore, because the left and right arms have demonstrated selective advantages when matching visual and proprioceptive targets, respectively, we assessed proprioceptive recalibration in right-handed subjects following training with either the right or the left hand. On average, we observed shifts in felt hand position of approximately 7.6° following training with misaligned visual feedback of the hand, which is consistent with our previous findings in which the distortion was introduced gradually. Moreover, no difference was observed in proprioceptive recalibration across the left and right hands. These findings suggest that proprioceptive recalibration is a robust process that arises symmetrically in the two hands following visuomotor adaptation regardless of the initial magnitude of the error signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeele S, Bock O (2001) Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: different mechanisms for small versus large rotations. Exp Brain Res 140:407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baraduc P, Wolpert DM (2002) Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J Neurophysiol 88:973–981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block HJ, Bastian AJ (2011) Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes. J Neurophysiol 106:59–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buch ER, Young S, Contreras-Vidal JL (2003) Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging. Learn Mem 10:55–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron BD, Franks IM, Inglis JT, Chua R (2010) The adaptability of self-action perception and movement control when the limb is passively versus actively moved. Conscious Cogn [Epub ahead of print]

  • Clayton H, Cressman E, Henriques D (2011) Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients and healthy controls. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressman EK, Henriques DY (2009) Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 102:3505–3518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cressman EK, Henriques DY (2010) Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following exposure to misaligned sensory input. J Neurophysiol 103:1888–1895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cressman EK, Salomonczyk D, Henriques DY (2010) Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults. Exp Brain Res 205:533–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Bastian AJ, Shadmehr R (2010) Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol 103:2275–2284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Grave DD, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2011) Judgments of reachability are independent of visuomotor adaptation. Perception 40:962–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goble DJ (2010) Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice. Phys Ther 90:1176–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goble DJ, Anguera JA (2010) Plastic changes in hand proprioception following force-field motor learning. J Neurophysiol 104:1213–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goble DJ, Brown SH (2008) Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets. J Neurophysiol 99:3063–3074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goble DJ, Brown SH (2010) Upper limb asymmetries in the perception of proprioceptively determined dynamic position sense. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36(3):768–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedert KM, Leblanc A, Tsai SW, Barrett AM (2010) Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left- and right-shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:795–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CS (1963) Adaptation to displaced vision: visual, motor, or proprioceptive change? Science 140:812–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay JC, Pick HL Jr (1966) Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus. J Exp Psychol 71:150–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques DY, Soechting JF (2003) Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry. Exp Brain Res 150:95–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones SA, Cressman EK, Henriques DY (2010) Proprioceptive localization of the left and right hands. Exp Brain Res 204:373–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE (1997) Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res 115:557–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kesten H (1958) Accelerated stochasitc approximation. Ann Math Stat 29:41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen J, Tong C, Flanagan JR (2005) Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 164:250–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1999) Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT (1996) Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. Brain 119(Pt 4):1199–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW (2006) An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26:3642–3645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michel C, Pisella L, Prablanc C, Rode G, Rossetti Y (2007) Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. J Cogn Neurosci 19:341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AA, Wong J, Gribble PL (2010) Somatosensory plasticity and motor learning. J Neurosci 30:5384–5393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redding GM, Wallace B (1996) Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:379–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rincon-Gonzalez L, Buneo CA, Helms Tillery SI (2011) The proprioceptive map of the arm is systematic and stable, but idiosyncratic. PLoS One 6:e25214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salomonczyk D, Cressman EK, Henriques DY (2011) Proprioceptive recalibration following prolonged training and increasing distortions in visuomotor adaptation. Neuropsychologia 49:3053–3062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simani MC, McGuire LM, Sabes PN (2007) Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects. J Neurophysiol 98:2827–2841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treutwein B (1995) Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vis Res 35:2503–2522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P (2002) When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12:834–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wei K, Kording K (2009) Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101:655–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson ET, Wong J, Gribble PL (2010) Mapping proprioception across a 2D horizontal workspace. PLoS One 5:e11851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Orysia Kachmarchuk for help with data collection. This work was supported by Canadian Institute of Health Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction and the Banting Foundation (DYPH) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). DS is supported by an NSERC doctoral scholarship. DYPH is an Alfred P. Sloan Fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin K. Cressman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salomonczyk, D., Henriques, D.Y.P. & Cressman, E.K. Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 217, 187–196 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2985-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2985-4

Keywords

Navigation