Skip to main content
Log in

Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that when people encounter a sudden and novel sensorimotor transformation that alters perceived or actual movement, they gradually adapt and can later recall what they have learned if they encounter the transformation again. In this study, we tested whether retention and recall of learning is also observed when kinematic and dynamic transformations are introduced incrementally such that participants never experience large movement errors. Participants adapted their reaching movements to either a visuomotor rotation of hand position (kinematic transformation) or a rotary viscous force-field applied to the hand (dynamic transformation). These perturbations were introduced either incrementally or instantaneously. Thus, four groups of participants were tested with an incremental and an instantaneous group for both the kinematic and dynamic perturbations. To evaluate retention of learning, participants from all four groups were tested a day later on the same kinematic or dynamic perturbation presented instantaneously (at full strength). As expected, we found that subjects in the instantaneous group retained learning across days. We also found that, for both kinematic and dynamic perturbations, retention was equally good or better when the transformation was introduced incrementally. Because large and clearly detectable movement errors were not observed during adaptation to incremental perturbations, we conclude that such errors are not required for the learning and retention of internal models of kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–b
Fig. 2a–b
Fig. 3a–b
Fig. 4
Fig. 5a–f

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedford FL (1999) Keeping perception accurate. Trends Cogn Sci 3:4–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock O, Schneider S, Bloomberg J (2001) Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 138:359–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2004) Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci 24:8662–8671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1997) The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experiences. J Neurophysiol 78:554–560

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R (2003) Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol 89:168–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham HA, Welch RB (1994) Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:987–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1997) The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci 17:1519–1528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (1999) Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments. J Neurosci 19:RC 34(1–5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goedert KM, Willingham DB (2002) Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learn Mem 9:279–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram HA, van Donkelaar P, Cole J, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM, Miall RC (2000) The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Exp Brain Res 132:114–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1989) Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for “automatic” visuomotor recalibration. Exp Brain Res 78:575–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS (1998) Sensory input and control of grip. In: Glickstein M (ed) Sensory guidance of movement. Novartis Foundation Symposium, vol 218. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 45–59

  • Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE (1997) Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res 115:557–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:718–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1999) Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2:1026–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio P (1994) Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72:299–313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malfait N, Ostry DJ (2004) Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load? J Neurosci 24:8084–8089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT (1996) Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. Brain 119:1199–1211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T (1997) Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17:409–419

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh K, Scott SH (2003) A motor learning strategy reflects neural circuitry for limb control. Nat Neurosci 6:399–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tong C, Flanagan JR (2003) Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. J Neurophysiol 90:578–585

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2002) Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci 22:1108–1113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter P, Wolpert DM (2000) Context estimation for sensorimotor control. J Neurophysiol 84:1026–1034

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wigmore V, Tong C, Flanagan JR (2002) Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:447–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3:1212–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Kawato M (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11:1317–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordon MI (1995) Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103:460–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Human Frontier Science Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Randall Flanagan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klassen, J., Tong, C. & Flanagan, J.R. Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 164, 250–259 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2247-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2247-4

Keywords

Navigation