Skip to main content
Log in

Learning a stick-balancing task involves task-specific coupling between posture and hand displacements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories of motor learning argue that the acquisition of novel motor skills requires a task-specific organization of sensory and motor subsystems. We examined task-specific coupling between motor subsystems as subjects learned a novel stick-balancing task. We focused on learning-induced changes in finger movements and body sway and investigated the effect of practice on their coupling. Eight subjects practiced balancing a cylindrical wooden stick for 30 min a day during a 20 day learning period. Finger movements and center of pressure trajectories were recorded in every fifth practice session (4 in total) using a ten camera VICON motion capture system interfaced with two force platforms. Motor learning was quantified using average balancing trial lengths, which increased with practice and confirmed that subjects learned the task. Nonlinear time series and phase space reconstruction methods were subsequently used to investigate changes in the spatiotemporal properties of finger movements, body sway and their progressive coupling. Systematic increases in subsystem coupling were observed despite reduced autocorrelation and differences in the temporal properties of center of pressure and finger trajectories. The average duration of these coupled trajectories increased systematically across the learning period. In short, the abrupt transition between coupled and decoupled subsystem dynamics suggested that stick balancing is regulated by a hierarchical control mechanism that switches from collective to independent control of the finger and center of pressure. In addition to traditional measures of motor performance, dynamical analyses revealed changes in motor subsystem organization that occurred when subjects learned a novel stick-balancing task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abarbanel HDI (1996) Analysis of observed chaotic systems. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamovich SV, Archambault PS, Ghafouri M, Levin MF, Poizner H, Feldman AG (2001) Hand trajectory invariance in reaching movements involving the trunk. Exp Brain Res 138:288–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed AA, Wolpert DM (2009) Transfer of dynamic learning across postures. J Neurophysiol 102:2816–2824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramaniam R, Riley MA, Turvey MT (2000) Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. Gait Posture 9:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1996) On dexterity and its development. In: Latash ML, Turvey MT (eds) Dexterity and its development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 2–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham GP (1988) Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Hum Mov Sci 7:225–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbert MF, van Ingen Schenau GJ (1988) Coordination in vertical jumping. J Biomech 21:249–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouisset S, Zattara M (1987) Biomechanical study of the programming of anticipatory postural adjustments associated with voluntary movement. J Biomech 20:735–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouisset S, Richardson J, Zattara M (2000) Are amplitude and duration of anticipatory postural adjustments identically scaled to focal movement parameters in humans? Neurosci Lett 278:153–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Kelso JAS (1999) To switch or not to switch: recruitment of degrees of freedom stabilizes biological coordination. J Mot Behav 31:126–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Kelso JAS, De Guzman GC, Ding M (1997) The spontaneous recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom in rhythmic hand movements. Hum Mov Sci 16:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera JL, Milton JG (2002) On-off intermittency in a human balancing task. Phys Rev Lett 89:15870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera JL, Milton JG (2004) Stick balancing: on-off intermittency and survival times. Nonlinear Stud 3:305–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Koh M (2007) Variation in coordination of a discrete multiarticular action as a function of skill level. J Mot Beh 39:463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cluff T, Balasubramaniam R (2009) Motor learning characterized by changing Lévy distributions. PLoS ONE 4:e5998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cluff T, Riley MA, Balasubramaniam R (2009) Dynamical structure of fingertip trajectories in pole balancing. Neurosci Lett 464:88–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cluff T, Gharib T, Balasubramaniam R (2010) Attentional influences on the performance of secondary physical tasks during postural control. Exp Brain Res 203:647–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordo PJ, Nashner LM (1982) Properties of postural adjustments associated with rapid arm movements. J Neurophysiol 47:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2002) Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. J Neurophysiol 88:222–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1997) The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci 17:1519–1528

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser AM, Swinney HL (1986) Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys Rev A 33:1134–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzitaki V, Konstadakos S (2007) Visuo-postural adaptation during the acquisition of a visually-guided weight-shifting task: age-related differences in global and local dynamics. Exp Brain Res 182:525–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SL, Newell KM (2006) Change in organization of degrees of freedom with learning. J Mot Behav 38:88–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Daffertshofer A, Beek PJ (2003) Learning to juggle: on the assembly of functional subsystems into a task-specific dynamical organization. Biol Cybern 88:302–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Daffertshofer A, Beek PJ (2004a) Multiple time scales and multiform dynamics in learning to juggle. Mot Control 7:188–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Daffertshofer A, Beek PJ (2004b) Multiple time scales and subsystem embedding in the learning of juggling. Hum Mov Sci 23:315–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behaviour. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Zanone PG (2002) Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:776–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HDI (1992) Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A 45:3403–3411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landa PS, Zaikin AA, Rosenblum MG, Kurths J (1998) On-off intermittency phenomena in a pendulum with a randomly vibrating suspension axis. Chaos Solitons Fractals 9:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwan N (2006) Commandline recurrence software. Version 1.13z. http://www.agnld.uni-potsdam.de/~marwan/6.download/rp.php

  • Marwan N, Carmen Romano M, Thiel M, Kurths J (2007) Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys Rep 438:237–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton J, Cabrera JL, Ohira T, Tajima S, Tonosaki Y, Eurich CW, Campbell SA (2009) The time-delayed inverted pendulum: implications for human balance control. Chaos 19:026110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagengast AJ, Braun DA, Wolpert DM (2009) Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS ONE 5:e1000419

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE (2001) Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum Mov Sci 20:695–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Liu YT, Mayer-Kress G (2001) Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychol Rev 108:57–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platt N, Spiegel EA, Tresser C (1993) On-off intermittency: a mechanism for bursting. Phys Rev Lett 70:279–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhea CK, Silver TA, Hong SL, Ryu JH, Studenka BE, Hughes CML, Haddad JM (2011) Noise and complexity in human postural control: interpreting the different interpretations of entropy. PLoS ONE 6:e17696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodacki ALF, Fowler NE, Bennett SJ (2001) Multi-segment coordination: fatigue effects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1157–1167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Smart LJ, Pagulayan RJ (1999) Postural stabilization of looking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1641–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Pagulayan RJ, Bardy BG, Hettinger LJ (2000) Modulating postural control to facilitate visual performance. Hum Mov Sci 19:203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Bardy BG, Bonnet CT, Hove P, Oullier O (2007) Postural sway and the frequency of horizontal eye movements. Mot Control 11:86–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen SP, Lee TD, Verschueren S, Serrien DJ, Bogaerds H (1997) Interlimb coordination: transfer across different effector systems. Hum Mov Sci 16:749–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 93:609–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Oviedo G, Macpherson JM, Ting LH (2006) Muscle synergy organization is robust across a variety of postural perturbations. J Neurophysiol 96:1530–1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken B, van Emmerik REA, Bongaardt R, Beek WJ, Newell KM (1997) Changing coordinative structures in complex skill acquisition. Hum Mov Sci 16:823–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (2009) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Zbilut JP, Zaldivar-Comenges JM, Strozzi F (2002) Recurrence quantification based Liapunov exponents for monitoring divergence in experimental data. Phys Lett A 297:173–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

TC was supported by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate scholarship. We thank members of the Sensorimotor Neuroscience Laboratory, the Motor Behaviour Group, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler Cluff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cluff, T., Boulet, J. & Balasubramaniam, R. Learning a stick-balancing task involves task-specific coupling between posture and hand displacements. Exp Brain Res 213, 15–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2768-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2768-y

Keywords

Navigation