Abstract
Understanding how the nervous system learns to coordinate the large number of degrees of freedom in the body to produce goal-directed movement is not only one of the central questions in theoretical movement neuroscience, but also has direct relevance for movement rehabilitation. In spite of the centrality of this issue, the literature on how a new coordination pattern is acquired and refined when first learning a novel task remains surprisingly small relative to studies that focus on modifications of already well-learned coordination patterns. In this chapter, we outline some of the reasons behind why the study of coordination continues to pose a serious challenge for movement neuroscience, particularly when it comes to systematically studying and testing hypotheses on how new coordination patterns are organized and reorganized with practice. We then describe a novel experimental paradigm—the body–machine interface (BoMI)—that has been developed and used over the last decade to examine this issue. The paradigm combines the control of a large number of degrees of freedom along with a linear mapping, which makes it appealing to examine how coordination of these high degrees of freedom is organized in a systematic fashion. Finally, we outline some of the new insights that this paradigm has provided into classic issues of motor learning such as the learning of high-dimensional spaces, generalization, and transfer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams JA (1987) Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull 101:41–74
Adolph KE, Cole WG, Komati M, Garciaguirre JS, Badaly D, Lingeman JM, Chan GL, Sotsky RB (2012) How do you learn to walk? Thousands of steps and dozens of falls per day. Psychol Sci 23:1387–1394
Bastian AJ (2008) Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 21:628–633
Berger DJ, Gentner R, Edmunds T, Pai DK, d’Avella A (2013) Differences in adaptation rates after virtual surgeries provide direct evidence for modularity. J Neurosci 33:12384–12394
Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Biess A, Liebermann DG, Flash T (2007) A computational model for redundant human three-dimensional pointing movements: integration of independent spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics. J Neurosci 27:13045–13064
Braun DA, Aertsen A, Wolpert DM, Mehring C (2009) Motor task variation induces structural learning. Curr Biol 19:352–357
Braun D, Mehring C, Wolpert D (2010) Structure learning in action. Behav Brain Res 206:157–165
Casadio M, Pressman A, Fishbach A, Danziger Z, Acosta S, Chen D, Tseng HY, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2010) Functional reorganization of upper-body movement after spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res 207:233–247
Casadio M, Ranganathan R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2012) The body-machine interface: a new perspective on an old theme. J Mot Behav 44:419–433
Cusumano JP, Cesari P (2006) Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task. Biol Cybern 94:367–379
d’Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (2003) Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci 6:300–308
de Rugy A, Loeb GE, Carroll TJ (2013) Are muscle synergies useful for neural control? Front Comput Neurosci 7:19
Farshchiansadegh A, Ranganathan R, Casadio M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2015) Adaptation to visual feedback delay in a redundant motor task. J Neurophysiol 113:426–433
Gessell A (1946) The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In: Carmichael L (ed) Manual of child psychology. John Wiley, New York, pp 295–331
Giszter S, Patil V, Hart C (2007) Primitives, premotor drives, and pattern generation: a combined computational and neuroethological perspective. Prog Brain Res 165:323–346
Heathcote A, Brown S, Mewhort DJ (2000) The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychon Bull Rev 7:185–207
Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2004) Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol (Lond) 556:267–282
Kelso JAS (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol 246:R1000–R1004
Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge
Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P (2011) Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21:636–644
Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924
Kutch JJ, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2012) Challenges and new approaches to proving the existence of muscle synergies of neural origin. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002434
Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA (2002) Individual pathways in the development of forceful throwing. Res Q Exerc Sport 73:245–256
Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA (2006) Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci 29:536–546
Lee MH, Ranganathan R, Kagerer FA, Mukherjee R (2016) Body-machine interface for control of a screen cursor for a child with congenital absence of upper and lower limbs: a case report. J Neuroeng Rehabil 13:34
Liu X, Scheidt RA (2008) Contributions of online visual feedback to the learning and generalization of novel finger coordination patterns. J Neurophysiol 99:2546–2557
Liu YT, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM (2006) Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:380–393
Liu X, Mosier KM, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Casadio M, Scheidt RA (2011) Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation. J Neurophysiol 105:454–473
Mosier KM, Scheidt RA, Acosta S, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2005) Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. J Neurophysiol 94:4362–4372
Müller H, Sternad D (2004) Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:212
Nazarpour K, Barnard A, Jackson A (2012) Flexible cortical control of task-specific muscle synergies. J Neurosci 32:12349–12360
Newell KM (1991) Motor skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol 42:213–237
Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1981) Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson JR (ed) Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 1–55
Osgood CE (1949) The similarity paradox in human learning; a resolution. Psychol Rev 56:132–143
Overduin SA, d’Avella A, Roh J, Carmena JM, Bizzi E (2015) Representation of muscle synergies in the primate brain. J Neurosci 35:12615–12624
Pierella C, Abdollahi F, Farshchiansadegh A, Pedersen J, Thorp EB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Casadio M (2015) Remapping residual coordination for controlling assistive devices and recovering motor functions. Neuropsychologia 79:364–376
Ranganathan R, Adewuyi A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2013) Learning to be lazy: exploiting redundancy in a novel task to minimize movement-related effort. J Neurosci 33:2754–2760
Ranganathan R, Wieser J, Mosier KM, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Scheidt RA (2014) Learning redundant motor tasks with and without overlapping dimensions: facilitation and interference effects. J Neurosci 34:8289–8299
Roberton MA, Halverson LE, Langendorfer S, Williams K (1979) Longitudinal changes in children’s overarm throw ball velocities. Res Q 50:256–264
Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF (1998) Postural hand synergies for tool use. J Neurosci 18:10105–10115
Scholz JP, Schoner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306
Serruya MD, Hatsopoulos NG, Paninski L, Fellows MR, Donoghue JP (2002) Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature 416:141–142
Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4:e179
Thelen E, Corbetta D, Spencer JP (1996) Development of reaching during the first year: role of movement speed. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:1059–1076
Thorp EB, Abdollahi F, Chen D, Farshchiansadegh A, Lee MH, Pedersen JP, Pierella C, Roth EJ, Seanez Gonzalez I, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2016) Upper body-based power wheelchair control interface for individuals with tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 24:249–260
Ting LH, McKay JL (2007) Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:622–628
Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235
Torres EB, Zipser D (2002) Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model. J Neurophysiol 88:2355–2367
Torres EB, Heilman KM, Poizner H (2011) Impaired endogenously evoked automated reaching in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci 31:17848–17863
Tresch MC, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (1999) The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nat Neurosci 2:162–167
Valero-Cuevas F, Cohn B, Yngvason H, Lawrence E (2015) Exploring the high-dimensional structure of muscle redundancy via subject-specific and generic musculoskeletal models. J Biomech 48:2887–2896
Wheat JS, Glazier PS (2006) Measuring coordination and variability in coordination. In: Davids K, Bennett SJ, Newell KM (eds) Movement system variability. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 167–181
Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM (2002) Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113:767–791
Wright ZA, Rymer WZ, Slutzky MW (2013) Reducing abnormal muscle coactivation after stroke using a myoelectric-computer interface: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28:443–451
Zipser D, Torres E (2007) Computing movement geometry: a step in sensory-motor transformations. Prog Brain Res 165:411–424
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Prof. Ferdinando Mussa-Ivaldi for his insightful and formative discussions, which were integral to the conception and execution of each of the glove BoMI experiments described in this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ranganathan, R., Scheidt, R.A. (2016). Organizing and Reorganizing Coordination Patterns. In: Laczko, J., Latash, M. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 957. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47312-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47313-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)