Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics model for analyzing reaching movements during active and passive torso rotation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have developed an inverse dynamics model of unrestrained natural reaching movements. Such movements are usually not planar and often involve complex deformation of the shoulder girdle as well as rotary and linear torso motion. Our model takes as its input kinematic data about the positions of the finger, wrist, elbow, left and right acromion processes, and the sternum and produces the torques and forces developed at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints. The model can also be used to simulate the consequences of introducing passive torso rotation or linear acceleration on arm movements and to simulate the consequences of applying mechanical perturbations to the reaching limb. It separately quantifies the contributions of inertial forces resulting from torso rotation and translation. In experimental paradigms involving arm movements, different dynamic components can be present such as active or passive torso rotation and translation, external forces and Coriolis forces. Our model provides a means of evaluating the different sources of force and the total muscle force needed to control the trajectory of the arm in their presence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. From the equations in Zatsiorsky and Seluyanov (1985) we calculated that for an average person the two transverse momenta of inertia of the upper arm are approximately 140 kg cm2 and 130 kg cm2, respectively, with 20% variation for different body heights and weights. Consequently we model the upper arm as a cylindrical inertial ellipsoid.

  2. The vertical component of the angular momentum is \({\bf h}_{\bf z} \cong \left({I_{{\rm T}} -I_{{\rm T}}} \right)\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)\sin(\vartheta)\dot {\alpha}+ \left({I_{{\rm L}} \sin(\alpha)^2+}{I_{{\rm T}} \cos(\alpha)^2} \right)\left({\dot {\vartheta}^r+\dot {\vartheta}_{{\rm T}} +\omega} \right).\) From the data in Zatsiorsky and Seluyanov (1985), we calculated that I L is about 40 kg cm2 ± 16% across a variety of body heights and weights. Consequently, \(I_{{\rm L}} \approx {I_{{\rm T}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{I_{{\rm T}}} 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3.\) For reaching movements in typical paradigms, kinematics variations values are: \(\alpha \approx 55{\text{--}}35^{\circ}, \dot{\alpha}\approx 0{\text{--}}15^{\circ}/{\rm s}, \vartheta^r=0{\text{--}}90^{\circ},\) and \(\dot {\vartheta}^r=0\text{--}70^{\circ}/{\rm s}.\) With these numerical values the angular momentum can be simplified as follows, \({\bf h}_{\bf z} \cong \frac{I_{{\rm T}}}{3}\sin(2\alpha)\sin(\vartheta)\dot {\alpha}+\frac{I_{{\rm T}} }{3}\left({\sin(\alpha)^2+3\cos(\alpha)^2} \right)\left({\dot {\vartheta }^r+\dot {\vartheta}_{{\rm T}} +\omega} \right).\) In addition, the term in \(\dot {\alpha}\) is ten to 20 times smaller than the term including \(\dot {\vartheta}^r\) when the torso is not rotating \((\dot {\vartheta}_{{\rm T}} =\omega =0).\) Therefore, an excellent approximation for the vertical component of the angular momentum is \({\bf h}_{\bf z} \cong \frac{I_{{\rm T}}}{3}\left({\sin(\alpha )^2+3\cos(\alpha)^2} \right) \ \left({\dot {\vartheta}^r+\dot {\vartheta }_{{\rm T}} +\omega} \right)\).

  3. \(\left. {\frac{{\rm d}{\bf h}}{{\rm d}t}} \right|_z =\mathop {\bf h}^\prime_z.\)

  4. All forces F are (9 × 1) arrays.

References

  • Bortolami SB, Pigeon P, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2008) Kinetic analysis of arm reaching movements during voluntary and passive rotation of the Torso. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1321-0

  • Burdet E, Tee KP, Mareels I, Milner TE, Chew CM, Franklin DW, Osu R, Kawato M (2006) Stability and motor adaptation in human arm movements. Biol Cybern 94(1):20–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen-Osmann P, Richter S, Konczak J, Kalveram KT (2002) Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models. Exp Brain Res 143(2):212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio P (1994) Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72(1):299–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikravesh PE (1988) Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

  • Pigeon P, Bortolami SB, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2003a) Coordinated turn and reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated Coriolis and interaction torques. J Neurophysiol 89:276–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon P, Bortolami SB, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2003b) Coordinated turn and reach movements. II. Planning in an external frame of reference. J Neurophysiol 89:290–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopenko RA, Frolov AA, Biryukova EV, Roby-Brami A (2001) Assessment of the accuracy of a human arm model with seven degrees of freedom. J Biomech 34(2):177–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raison M, Gaudez C, Le Bozec S, Willems PY (2007) Determination of joint efforts in the human body during maximum ramp pushing efforts. J Biomech 40(3):627–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142(2):241–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seth A, Pandy MG (2007) A neuromusculoskeletal tracking method for estimating individual muscle forces in human movement. J Biomech 40(2):356–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky Z, Seluyanov V (1985) Estimation of the mass and inertia characteristics of the human body by means of the best predictive regression equations. Biomechanics IX:233–239

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Marco Quadrelli, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology for useful discussions during the development of our arm model. Support was provided by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, R01AR4854601.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone B. Bortolami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bortolami, S.B., Pigeon, P., DiZio, P. et al. Dynamics model for analyzing reaching movements during active and passive torso rotation. Exp Brain Res 187, 525–534 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1323-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1323-y

Keywords

Navigation