Abstract
Human smooth pursuit eye movements are principally driven by visual feedback and cannot normally be initiated at will. However, when tracking periodic motion, smooth eye movements reverse direction prior to target reversal, driven by anticipation, not visual feedback. Here, we investigate cognitive control over such eye reversals. Target stimuli were discrete double ramps—constant speed (30°/s) rightwards followed by similar leftward movement, reversal time ranging from 420 ms to 840 ms. Three experimental conditions were examined. In the precued condition, double ramps of randomised reversal time were presented. Prior to ramp presentation audio precues were given with an interval indicating start and reversal time of the unseen, upcoming double ramp. Subjects were able to use these cues to voluntarily control timing of anticipatory eye reversal, so that when occasional false precues gave underestimates of target reversal time, eye reversal occurred before target reversal. Precued eye reversal times were comparable to those in a second, predictable condition, in which double ramps with identical reversal time were given repeatedly without precues. In contrast, reversal occurred much later in a third, reactive condition, also without precues, when unexpected early target reversals occurred sporadically within a series having identical, predictable reversal times. The findings provide evidence that timing of anticipatory smooth eye movement, both at the start of the double-ramp and at its reversal, can be independently controlled at will using non-motion-based timing cues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes GR, Asselman PT (1991) The mechanism of prediction in human smooth pursuit eye movements. J Physiol (Lond) 439:439–461
Barnes GR, Asselman PT (1992) Pursuit of intermittently illuminated moving targets in the human. J Physiol (Lond) 445:617–637
Barnes GR, Donelan AS (1999) The remembered pursuit task: evidence for segregation of timing and velocity storage in predictive oculomotor control. Exp Brain Res 129:57–67
Barnes GR, Schmid AM (2002) Sequence learning in human ocular smooth pursuit. Exp Brain Res 144:322–335
Barnes GR, Collins CJS, Arnold LR (2004) Predicting the duration of ocular pursuit in humans. Exp Brain Res 160:10–21
Bennett SJ, Barnes GR (2003) Human ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a moving target. J Neurophysiol 90:2504–2520
Boman DK, Hotson JR (1992) Predictive smooth pursuit eye movements near abrupt changes in motion direction. Vis Res 32:675–689
Carl JR, Gellman RS (1987) Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses. J Neurophysiol 57:1446–1463
Coull JT, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD (1998) Monitoring for target objects: activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task. Neuropsychologia 36:1325–1334
Creelman CD (1962) Human discrimination of auditory duration. J Acoust Soc Am 34:582–593
Dallos PJ, Jones RW (1963) Learning behaviour of the eye fixation control system. IEEE Trans Ac 8:218–227
Dunlap K (1910) Reactions to rhythmic stimuli, with attempt to synchronize. Psychol Rev 17:399–416
Gibbon J, Church RM, Meck WH (1984) Scalar timing in memory. Ann New York Acad Sci 423:52–77
Harrington DL, Haaland KY, Hermanowicz N (1998) Temporal processing in the basal ganglia. Neuropsychology 12:3–12
Heywood S, Churcher J (1971) Eye movements and the afterimage, 1: tracking the afterimage. Vis Res 11:1163–1168
Ivry RB, Keele SW (1989) Timing functions of the cerebellum. J Cognit Neurosci 1:136–152
Jarrett CB, Barnes GR (2001) Volitional selection of direction in the generation of anicipatory smooth pursuit in humans. Neurosci Lett 312:25–28
Jarrett CB, Barnes GR (2002) Volitional scaling of anticipatory ocular pursuit velocity using precues. Cogn Brain Res 14:383–388
Kowler E (1989) Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit. Vis Res 29:1049–1057
Kowler E, Martins AJ, Pavel M (1984) The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control, IV: anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions. Vis Res 24:197–210
Lewis PA, Miall RC (2003) Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:250–255
Madelain L, Krauzlis RJ (2003) Pursuit of the ineffable: perceptual and motor reversals during the tracking of apparent motion. J Vis 3:642–653
Miall RC (1992) Oscillators, predictions and time. In: Macar F, Pouthas V, Friedman WJ (eds) Time, action and cognition. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 215–227
Pola J, Wyatt HJ (1997) Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: effects of target presence and subject attention. Vis Res 39:2767–2775
Rao SM, Mayer AR, Harrington DL (2001) The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing. Nat Neurosci 4:317–323
Robinson DA (1965) The mechanics of human smooth pursuit eye movements. J Physiol (Lond) 180:569–591
Robinson DA, Gordon JL, Gordon SE (1986) A Model of the smooth pursuit eye movement system. Biol Cybern 55:43–57
Staddon JER, Higa JJ (1999) Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. J Exp Anal Behav 71:215–251
Stevens LT (1886) On the time-sense. Mind 11:393–404
Treisman M (1963) Temporal discrimnation and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl 77:1–31
Wells SG, Barnes GR (1999) Predictive smooth pursuit eye movements during identification of moving acuity targets. Vis Res 39:2767–2775
Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973a) Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Percept Psychophys 14:5–12
Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973b) The timing of interresponse intervals. Percept Psychophys 13:455–460
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarrett, C., Barnes, G. The use of non-motion-based cues to pre-programme the timing of predictive velocity reversal in human smooth pursuit. Exp Brain Res 164, 423–430 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2260-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2260-7