Skip to main content
Log in

Detection and quantification of viable Bacillus cereus in food by RT–qPCR

  • Original paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A reverse-transcription real-time PCR (RT–qPCR) procedure, targeting the phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C (pc-plc) mRNA, was developed for the specific detection and quantification of viable Bacillus cereus. Initial experiments focused on evaluating the performance of various RNA extraction kits and optimizing the DNase I digestion. After optimization, RNA from B. cereus was isolated, and following DNase treatment, the RNA was amplified by RT–qPCR. The assay was used to construct a calibration curve from purified RNA of B. cereus CECT 148T, and it had a wide quantification range of 5 log units. The detection limit was 30 CFU per reaction and the efficiency 0.88. When the developed methodology was applied in artificially contaminated liquid egg, the detection limit was found to be 850 CFU per reaction or 1.1 × 104 CFU per mL of food sample without an enrichment step. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that an assay for the detection and quantification of viable B. cereus in food has been described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Food Safety Authority (2007) The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents, antimicrobial resistance and foodborne outbreaks in the European union in 2006. EFSA J 130:3–352

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fricker M, Messelhausser U, Busch U, Scherer S, Ehling-Schulz M (2007) Diagnostic real-time PCR assays for the detection of emetic Bacillus cereus strains in foods and recent food-borne outbreaks. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1892–1898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dierick K, Van Coillie CE, Swiecicka I, Meyfroidt G, Devlieger H, Meulemans A, Hoedemaekers G, Fourie L, Heyndrickx M, Mahillon J (2005) Fatal family outbreak of Bacillus cereus-associated food poisoning. J Clin Microbiol 43:4277–4279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Netten P, van de Moosdijk A, van Hoensel P, Mossel DAA, Perales I (1990) Psychrotrophic strains of Bacillus cereus producing enterotoxin. J Appl Bacteriol 69:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkeley R, Heyndrickx M, Logan N, De Vos P (2002) Bacillus cereus and food poisoning. In: Granum PE (ed) Applications and systematics of Bacillus and relatives. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 37–46

  6. Martínez-Blanch JF, Sánchez G, Garay E, Aznar R (2009) Development of a real-time PCR Assay for detection and quantification of enterotoxigenic members of Bacillus cereus group in food samples. Int J Food Microbiol 135:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martínez-Blanch JF, Sánchez G, Garay E, Aznar R (2010) Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for the detection and quantification of Bacillus cereus group spores in food. J Food Prot 73:1480–1485

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herman L (1997) Detection of viable and dead Listeria monocytogenes by PCR. Food Microbiol 14:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McIngvale SC, Elhanafi D, Drake MA (2002) Optimization of reverse transcriptase PCR to detect viable Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:799–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein PG, Juneja VK (1997) Sensitive detection of viable Listeria monocytogenes by reverse transcription-PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4441–4448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook N (2003) The use of NASBA for the detection of microbial pathogens in food and environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods 53:165–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JL, Levin RE (2006) Use of ethidium bromide monoazide for quantification of viable and dead mixed bacterial flora from fish fillets by polymerase chain reaction. J Microbiol Methods 67:456–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nocker A, Cheung CY, Camper AK (2006) Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live versus dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods 67:310–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan Y, Breidt F (2007) Enumeration of viable Listeria monocytogenes cells by real-time PCR with propidium monoazide and ethidium monoazide in the presence of dead cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:8028–8031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudi K, Moen B, Dromtorp SM, Holck AL (2005) Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1018–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood SL, Waites WM (1988) Factors affecting the occurrence of Bacillus cereus in liquid whole egg. Food Microbiol 5:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knutsson R, Lofstrom C, Grage H, Hoorfar J, Radstrom P (2002) Modeling of 5′ nuclease real-time responses for optimization of a high-throughput enrichment PCR procedure for Salmonella enterica. J Clin Microbiol 40:52–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bustin SA (2002) Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol 29:23–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma VK (2006) Real-time reverse transcription-multiplex PCR for simultaneous and specific detection of rfbE and eae genes of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Mol Cell Probes 20:298–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Escalona N, Hammack TS, Russell M, Jacobson AP, De Jesus AJ, Brown EW, Lampel KA (2009) Detection of live Salmonella sp. Cells in produce by a TaqMan-based quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR targeting invA mRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3714–3720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anonymous (2003) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs -- Protocol for the validation of alternative methods. ISO 16140:2003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología” (CICYT) grant AGL2000-1462 and the CECT. J. F. Martínez was the recipient of a Ph. D. fellowship UA-BPD2002, and G. Sánchez is the recipient of a JAE doctor grant both from the “Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas” (CSIC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Aznar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez-Blanch, J.F., Sánchez, G., Garay, E. et al. Detection and quantification of viable Bacillus cereus in food by RT–qPCR. Eur Food Res Technol 232, 951–955 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1465-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1465-1

Keywords

Navigation