Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing and exploiting the rheology of wheat hardness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the manufacture of cereal products, such as milling of wheat, the mixing of the dough, and baking of cakes and breads, because direct end-product testing is expensive and time consuming, it is popular for industry to utilize appropriate surrogates (representative indirect measurements) to predict various end-product outcomes. For some specific properties, such as milling yield, dough viscoelasticity, or bread loaf volume, the identification and validation of possible surrogates is a major motivating goal in the R&D of cereal science. For example, because end-product quality of many foods made from wheat flour is known to depend principally on the structural and rheological properties of the high molecular weight protein fraction in the flour, the rheology of doughs made from wheat flours is an appropriate and popular choice for the surrogate. Equally important is the end-product testing of the flour milled from a wheat. In this situation, an appropriate surrogate is some measure of the rheology of grain hardness; namely, the deformation and fracturing of the wheat during the milling as a function of the mechanical properties of the various botanical layers within wheat kernels. The current popular measures are particle size index and single kernel characterization system (SKCS) hardness index. However, they are quite indirect and only single-value summaries of the mechanical strengths of the botanical layers. An alternative strategy is the measurement (on an SKCS 4100 device) of a large number of individual crush response profiles which are averaged to produce a representative average crush response profile (aCRP), which can be viewed as an indirect measurement of the strengths of the internal botanical layers. To utilize the rheology of grain hardness as a predictor for the flour that can be milled from various wheats, there is a need to first characterize the information that can be recovered about the mechanical strengths of the internal botanical layers from the morphology of an aCRP. This is the goal and focus of this article. From this perspective, the SKCS 4100 device can be viewed as playing the role of a grain hardness rheometer. Independent motivation identifying a need for an explicit characterization of the rheology of grain hardness is the increasing list of publications exploring and exploiting various features of aCRPs as predictor of key aspects of end-product quality. The results of such publications are briefly reviewed to highlight the growing importance of grain hardness rheology in cereal science. In addition, illustrative examples arising from the current deliberations are included. The SKCS rheological characterization of the strengths of the botanical layers in wheat kernels, as explained in this article, will apply more generally to all cereal grains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SKCS:

Single kernel characterisation system

HI:

Hardness index

CRP:

Crush response profile

RPP:

Rheological phenotype phase

L-B:

Lorikeet–Bowerbird

L-L:

Lorikeet–Lang

R-D:

Rosella–Drysdale

M:

Moisture content

W:

Kernel weight

D:

Kernel diameter

SC:

Shell collapse

ER:

Elastic response

EndoR:

Endosperm response

EqP:

Equilibrium position

EndoC:

Endosperm collapse

Eq:

Equilibrium response

SSp:

Shell springback

SR:

Shell response

QTL:

Qualitative trait loci

References

  1. Dobraszczyk BJ (2004) The physics of baking: rheological and polymer molecular structure-function relationships in breadmaking. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 124:61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gras PW, Carpenter HC, Anderssen RS (2000) Modelling the developmental rheology of wheat-flour dough using extension tests. J Cereal Sci 31:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bushuk W (1998) Wheat breeding for end-product use (Reprinted from Wheat: Prospects for global improvement, 1998). Euphytica 100:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin JM, Frohberg RC, Morris CF, Talbert LE, Giroux MJ (2001) Milling and bread baking trials associated with puroindoline sequence type in hard spring wheat. Crop Sci 41:228–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bean SR, Chung OK, Tuinstra MR, Pedersen JF, Erpelding J (2006) Evaluation of the single kernel characterization system (SKCS) for measurement of sorghum grain attributes. Cereal Chem 83:108–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyford CP, Kidd W, Rayas-Duarte P, Deyoe Ch (2005) Prediction of flour extraction rate in hard red winter wheat using the single kernel characterization. J Food Qual 28(3):279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang CY, Campbell GM (2002) Modelling of wheat breakage during first break roller milling based on single kernel characteristics, Cereal 2002. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Australian cereal chemistry conference, royal Australian chemical institute, pp 95–98

  8. Fang CY, Campbell GM (2002) Stress analysis and visual observation of wheat kernel breakage during roller milling using fluted rolls. Cereal Chem 79:511–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morris CF, Pitts MJ, Bettge AD, Pecka K, King GE, McCluskey PJ (2008) Compressive strength of wheat endosperm: analysis of endosperm bricks. Cereal Chem 85(3):351–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris CF, Bettge AD, Pitts MJ, King GE, Pecka K, McCluskey PJ (2008) Compressive strength of wheat endosperm: comparison of endosperm bricks to the single kernel characterization system. Cereal Chem 85(3):359–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osborne BG, Anderssen RS (2003) Single-kernel characterization principles and applications. Cereal Chem 80:613–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards MA, Osborne BG, Henry RJ (2007) Investigation of the effect of conditioning on the fracture of hard and soft wheat grain by the single-kernel characterization system: a comparison with roller milling. J Cereal Sci 46:64–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Osborne BG, Henry RJ, Southan MD (2007) Assessment of commercial milling potential of hard wheat by measurement of the rheological properties of whole grain. J Cereal Sci 45:122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Osborne BG, Turnbull KM, Anderssen RS, Rahman S, Sharp PJ, Appels R (2001) The hardness locus in Australian wheat lines. Aust J Agric Res 52:1275–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Osborne BG, Anderssen RS, Huynh HN (2004) In situ measurement of the rheological properties of wheat and barley grain using the SKCS 4100. In: Cauvain SP, Salmon SE, Young LS (eds) In: Proc. 12th ICC Cereal & Bread Congress. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Harrogate, pp 207–211

  16. http://www.awb.com.au/growers/awbseeds/productprofile

  17. Dobraszczyk BJ (1994) Fracture mechanics of vitreous and mealy wheat endosperm. J Cereal Sci 19:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Greffeuille V, Abecassis J, Rousset M, Oury FX, Faye A, L’Helgouac’h CB, Lullien-Pellerin V (2006) Grain characterization and milling behaviour of near-isogenic lines differing by hardness. Theor Appl Genet 114:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderssen RS, de Hoog F, Hegland M (1998) A stable finite difference ansatz for higher order differentiation of non-exact data. Bull Aust Math Soc 58:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  20. Husain SA, Anderssen RS (2005) Algorithms for the recovery of Kohlrausch parameters from viscoelastic stress–strain data. ANZIAM J 46(E):C101–C121

    Google Scholar 

  21. Greffeuille V, Mabille F, Rousset M, Oury FX, Abecassis J, Lullien-Pellerin V (2007) Mechanical properties of outer layers from near-isogenic lines of common wheat differing in hardness. J Cereal Sci 45:227–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiley PR, Tosi P, Evrard A, Lovegrove A, Jones HD, Shewry PR (2007) Promoter analysis and immunolocalisation show that puroindoline genes are exclusively expressed in starchy endosperm cells of wheat grain. Plant Mol Biol 64:125–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dobraszczyk BJ, Whitworth MB, Vincent FV, Khan AA (2002) Single kernel wheat hardness and fracture properties in relation to density and the modelling of fracture in wheat endosperm. J Cereal Sci 35:245–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiley PR (2006) The use of genetic transformation to determine the molecular basis for grain texture in wheat, PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, 218 pp

  25. Lillemo M, Chen F, Xia X, William M, Pena RJ, Trethowan R, He Z (2006) Puroindoline grain hardness alleles in CIMMYT bread wheat germplasm. J Cereal Sci 44:86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xia L, Geng H, Chen X, He Z, Lillemo M, Morris CF (2008) Silencing of puroindoline a alters the kernel texture in transgenic bread wheat. J Cereal Sci 47:331–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pickering P, Bhave M (2007) Comprehensive analysis of Australian hard wheat cultivars shows limited puroindoline allele diversity. Plant Sci 172:371–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris CF (2002) Puroindolines: the molecular basis of wheat grain hardness. Plant Mol Biol 48:633–647

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feiz L, Martin JM, Giroux MJ (2008) Relationship between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain hardness and wet-milling quality. Cereal Chem 85:44–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Turnbull KM, Rahman S (2002) Endosperm texture in wheat. J Cereal Sci 36:327–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gazza L, Taddei F, Corbellini M, Cacciatori P, Pogna NE (2008) Genetic and environmental factors affecting grain texture in common wheat. J Cereal Sci 47:52–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gross C, Bervas E, Charmet G (2004) Genetic analysis of grain protein content, grain hardness and dough rheology in a hardXhard bread wheat progeny. J Cereal Sci 40:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Igrejas G, Gaborit T, Oury FX, Chiron H, Marion D, Branlard G (2001) Genetic and environmental effects on Puroindoline-a and Puroindoline-b content and their relationship to technological properties in French bread wheats. J Cereal Sci 34:37–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Topin V, Radjaı F, Delenne JY, Sadoudi A, Mabille F (2008) Wheat endosperm as a cohesive granular material. J Cereal Sci 47:347–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Crepieux S, Lebreton C, Flament P, Charmet G (2005) Application of a new IBD-based QTL mapping method to common wheat breeding population: analysis of kernel hardness and dough strength. Theor Appl Genet 111:1409–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iwami A, Osborne BG, Huynh HN, Anderssen RS, Wesley IJ, Kajiwara Y, Takashita H, Omori T (2005) The measurement of structural characteristics of barley for Shochu using single-kernel characterization system 4100 crush-response profiles. J Inst Brewing 111:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pomeranz Y, Williams PC (1990) Wheat hardness: its genetic, structural and biochemical background, measurement and significance. In: Pomeranz Y (ed) Advances in cereal sciences and technology, vol 10. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, pp 467–470

    Google Scholar 

  38. Osborne BG, Kotwal Z, Blakeney AB, O’Brien L, Shah S, Fearn T (1997) Application of the single kernel characterization system to wheat receiving testing and quality prediction. Cereal Chem 74(4):467–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sissons MJ, Osborne BG, Hare RA, Sissons SA, Jackson R (2000) Application of the single-kernel characterization system to durum wheat testing and quality prediction. Cereal Chem 77(1):4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Greer EN, Stewart BA (2006) The water absorption of wheat flour: relative effects of protein and starch. J Sci Food Agric 10(4):248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Morgan BC, Dexter JE, Preston KR (2000) Relationship of kernel size to flour water absorption for Canada Western red spring wheat. Cereal Chem 77(3):286–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma W, Sutherland MW, Kammholz S, Banks P, Brennan P, Bovill W, Daggard G (2007) Wheat flour protein content and water absorption analysis in a doubled haploid population. J Cereal Sci 45(3):302–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee KM, Shroyer JP, Herrmann TJ, Lingenfelser J (2006) Blending hard white wheat to improve grain yield and end-use performances. Crop Sci 46:1124–1129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Park YS, Chang HG (2007) Single-kernel characteristics of soft wheat in relation to milling and end-use properties. Food Sci Biotechnol 16(6):918–923

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morris CF (1992) Impact of blending hard and soft wheats on milling and baking quality. Cereal Food World 37:643–648

    Google Scholar 

  46. Veha A (2007) Correlation between the kernel structure and the quality parameters on some Hungarian winter wheat varieties. Cereal Res Commun 35:1289–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Campbell GM, Webb C (2001) On predicting roller milling performance Part I: the breakage equation. Powder Technol 115:234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Campbell GM, Bunn PJ, Webb C, Hook SCW (2001) On predicting roller milling performance Part I: the breakage function. Powder Technol 115:243–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Shuey WC (1960) A wheat sizing technique for predicting flour milling yield. Cereal Sci Today 5:71–72, 75

    Google Scholar 

  50. Degouet C, Nsom B, Lolive E, Grohens A (2007) Characterization of wood granules, soya, colza and rye seeds. Appl Rheol 17:36546

    Google Scholar 

  51. Anderssen RS, Osborne BG, Wesley IJ (2003) The application of localization to near infrared calibration and prediction through partial least squares regression. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 11:39–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Haraszi R, Anderssen RS (2007) Measuring the rheology of grain hardness, Paper 3-9 in Gluten Proteins 2006. In: Lookhart GL, Ng PKW (eds) AACC 2007, pp 274–278

  53. Haraszi R, Bekes F, Ruggiero K, Gale KR, Anderssen RS (2004) Single kernel characterization system (SKCS) analysis of wheat grain blending, Cereals 2004. In: Black CK, Panozzo JF, Rebetzke GJ (eds) Proceedings of the 54th Australian cereal chemistry conference and 11th wheat breeders assembly, 21st–24th September, Canberra, ACT, pp 362–365

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kevin Gale, Frank Békés, Barbara Butow, and Kathy Ruggiero for their valuable advice, Brian Osborne and BRI staff, who performed the SKCS measurements, and to AWB Limited, which provided the wheat grain samples. Many thanks also go to Graingene II for supporting an independent research project on blending that led to the formulation of the concept of computational blending mentioned in this article, and to David Lovell for his careful reading of earlier drafts. The first author wishes to acknowledge support received from the Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics (RICAM), where some of the research reported here was accomplished. The first author has benefited from useful discussions with Dr. Paul Wiley of CSIRO Plant Industry. Both authors acknowledge with thanks for the advice received from one of the reviewers which has resulted in a substantially improved paper. Reka Haraszi acknowledges the support of a Bolyai Janos scholarship founded by the Hungarian Academy of Science (2006–2009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Anderssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderssen, R.S., Haraszi, R. Characterizing and exploiting the rheology of wheat hardness. Eur Food Res Technol 229, 159–174 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-009-1037-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-009-1037-9

Keywords

Navigation