Skip to main content
Log in

Docking and virtual screening of ACE inhibitory dipeptides

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Screening, isolation and in vitro or in vivo assays have been used for characterisation of bioactive peptides derived from food proteins. Bioinformatic computational methods as quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and computer-predicted (in silico) proteolysis have been complementary to experimentally work. Recent developments in molecular characterisation and bioinformatics have further made it possible to “dock” small molecules (i.e. ligands) towards proteins and “score” their potential binding. Thus, methods like docking and virtual screening are becoming widely used in drug development, but to our knowledge have found limited use in food science. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory dipeptides were therefore docked towards a protein target. A significant relationship was found between results from computational docking and experimental values for inhibition (n=58, R 2=0.28, p<0.001). Docking and virtual screening were found feasible to identify promising bioactive peptide structures and could provide molecular understanding but does not replace the need for experimental verification and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sousa MJ, Ardö Y, McSweeney PLH (2001) Int Dairy J 11:327–345. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00062-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gobbetti M, Stepaniak L, De Angelis M, Corsetti A, Di Cagno R (2002) Crit Rev Food Sci 42:223–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. RoudotAlgaron F (1996) Lait 76:313–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva SV, Malcata FX (2005) Int Dairy J 15:1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.04.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Korhonen H, Pihlanto A (2006) Int Dairy J, in press. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.012

  6. Pripp AH, Isaksson T, Stepaniak L, Sørhaug T, Ardö Y (2005) Trends Food Sci Technol 16:484–494. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.07.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dziuba J, Iwaniak A (2005) Database of protein and bioactive peptide sequences. In: Mine Y, Shahidi F (eds) Neutraceutical proteins and peptides in health and disease. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dziuba J, Iwaniak A, Minkiewicz P (2003) Polimery 48:50–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dzuiba J, Niklewicz M, Iwaniak A, Darewicz M, Minkiewicz P (2004) Acta Aliment Hung 33:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vermeirssen V, van der Bent A, Van Camp J, van Amerongen A, Verstraete W (2004) Biochimie 86:231–239. DOI 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.01.003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pripp AH (2005) Eur Food Res Technol 211:712–716. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-005-0083-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berman HM, Bhat TN, Bourne PE, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Weissig H, Westbrook J (2000) Nature Struct Biol 7:957–959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Westbrook J, Feng Z, Chen L, Yang H, Bergman HM (2003) Nucleic Acid Res 31:489–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J (2004) Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:935–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sangma C, Chuakheaw D, Jongkon N, Saenbandit K, Nunrium P, Uthayopas P, Hannongbua S (2005) Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 8:417–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kroeger Smith MB, Hose BM, Hawkins A, Lipchock J, Farnsworth DW, Rizzo RC, Tirado-Rives J, Arnold E, Zhang W, Hughes SH, Jorgensen WL, Michejda CJ, Smith RH Jr (2003) J Med Chem 46:1940–1947. DOI: 10.1021/jm020271f

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM, Clarke B, LaLonde J, Lambert MH, Lindvall M, Nevins N, Semus SF, Sanger S, Tedesco G, Wall ID, Woolven JM, Peishoff CE, Head MS (2005) J Med Chem ASAP article DOI: 10.1021/jm050362n

  18. Cushman DW, Cheung HS, Sabo EF, Ondetti MA (1981) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: evolution of a new class of antihypertensive drugs. In: Horovitz (ed) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Mechanisms of action and clinical implications. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp 3–25

  19. Hellberg S, Eriksson L, Johsson J, Lindgren F, Sjöström M, Skagerberg B, Wold S, Andrews P (1989) Int J Peptide Res 37:414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomsen R, Christensen MH (2006) J Med Chem 49:3315–3321. DOI: 10.1021/jm051197e

    Google Scholar 

  21. Creighton TE (1993) Proteins: structures and molecular properties 2nd ed. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sturrock ED, Natesh R, van Rooyen JM, Acharya KR (2004) Cell Mol Life Sci 61:2677–2686. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-004-4239-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pripp AH, Isaksson T, Stepaniak L, Sørhaug T (2004) Eur Food Res Technol 219:579–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Are Hugo Pripp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pripp, A.H. Docking and virtual screening of ACE inhibitory dipeptides. Eur Food Res Technol 225, 589–592 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0450-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0450-6

Keywords

Navigation