Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative evaluation of three methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography analysis combined with a 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay for the rapid screening of antioxidants from Pueraria lobata flowers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional activity-guided fractionation of natural products is a time-consuming, labor intensive, and expensive strategy, which cannot compete with high-throughput and rapid screening of natural products. Therefore, more efficient approaches are necessary for searching active compounds from natural products. Three main methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis combined with 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay, DPPH spiking HPLC analysis, on-line post-column HPLC-DPPH analysis, and HPLC-based DPPH activity profiling, were then developed for the rapid screening of antioxidants from complex mixtures. In the present study, a comparative study of these three methods has been conducted to identify antioxidants from an ethyl acetate fraction of Pueraria lobata flowers. The parameters in HPLC analysis and DPPH assay were optimized. The results indicated that all three methods could achieve similar information with regard to antioxidants, without the need for preparative isolation techniques. However, there were differences in instrumental set-up, sensitivity, and efficiency. DPPH spiking HPLC analysis seemed to be more sensitive and effective with simpler instrumental set-up and easier operation, which could also detect the total antioxidant capacity of color complexes. Eighteen antioxidants were tentatively screened and identified from P. lobata flowers by DPPH spiking HPLC-MS/MS. Among them, ten compounds including one new compound were first isolated from P. lobata flowers, and the DPPH radical scavenging activity of the new compound was reported for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodman M, Bostick RM, Kucuk O, Jones DP (2011) Clinical trials of antioxidants as cancer prevention agents. Free Radic Biol Med 51:1068–1084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabassum A, Bristow RG, Venkateswaran V (2010) Ingestion of selenium and other antioxidants during prostate cancer radiotherapy: a good thing? Cancer Treat Rev 36:230–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi SY, Zhou HH, Zhang YP, Jiang XY, Chen XQ, Huang KL (2009) Coupling HPLC to on-line, post-column (bio)chemical assays for high-resolution screening of bioactive compounds from complex mixtures. Trends Anal Chem 28:865–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hook DJ, Pack EJ, Yacobucci JJ, Guss J (1997) Approaches to automating the dereplication of bioactive natural products—the key step in high throughput screening of bioactive materials from natural sources. J Biomol Screen 2:145–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Espada A, Anta C, Bragado A, Rodríguez J, Jiménez C (2011) An approach to speed up the isolation of hydrophilic metabolites from natural sources at semipreparative level by using a HLB/MCX-HPLC/MS system. J Chromatogr A 1218:1790–1794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinmann D, Ganzera M (2011) Recent advances on HPLC/MS in medicinal plant analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal 55:744–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Noipa T, Srijaranai S, Tuntulani T, Ngeontae W (2011) New approach for evaluation of the antioxidant capacity based on scavenging DPPH free radical in micelle system. Food Res Intern 44:798–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra K, Ojha H, Chaudhury NK (2012) Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH· assay: a critical review and results. Food Chem 130:1036–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang D, Li HJ, Chen J, Guo CW, Li P (2008) Rapid and simple method for screening of natural antioxidants from Chinese herb Flos Lonicerae Japonicae by DPPH-HPLC-DAD-TOF/MS. J Sep Sci 31:3519–3526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang YP, Shi SY, Wang YX, Huang KL (2011) Target-guided isolation and purification of antioxidants from Selaginella sinensis by offline coupling of DPPH-HPLC and HSCCC experiments. J Chromaotogr B 879:191–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koleva II, Niederländer HAG, van Beek TA (2000) An on-line HPLC method for detection of radical scavenging compounds in complex mixtures. Anal Chem 72:2323–2328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott GP, Noonan LK, Mnatsakanyan M, Shalliker RA, Conlan XA, Barnett NW, Francis PS (2010) High-performance liquid chromatography with post-column 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging assay: methodological considerations and application to complex samples. Anal Chim Acta 675:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi SY, Zhao Y, Zhou HH, Zhang YP, Jiang XY, Huang KL (2008) Identification of antioxidants from Taraxacum mongolicum by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-radical scavenging detection-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. J Chromatogr A 1209:145–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Exarchou V, Fiamegos YC, van Beek TA, Nanos C, Vervoort J (2006) Hyphenated chromatographic techniques for the rapid screening and identification of antioxidants in methanolic extracts of pharmaceutically used plants. J Chromatogr A 1112:293–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wennberg T, Kreander K, Lähdevuori M, Vuorela H, Vuorela P (2004) Primary screening of natural products using micro fractionation combined with a bioassay. J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol 27:2573–2592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Committee for the Pharmacopoeia of P.R. China (2000) Pharmacopoeia of P.R. China, part I. Guangdong Science and Technology Publishing House, Guangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bebrevska L, Foubert K, Hermans N, Chatterjee S, Van Marck E, De Meyer G, Vlietinck A, Pieters L, Apers S (2010) In vivo antioxidant activity of a quantified Pueraria lobata root extract. J Ethnopharmacol 127:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pei XP, Pei MR, Ding HQ (2010) Chemical constituents from Pueraria lobata flower. Shanxi Daxue Xuebao 33:423–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinjo J, Takeshita T, Abe Y, Terada N, Yamashita H, Yamasaki M, Takeuchi K, Murakami K, Tomimatsu T, Nohara T (1988) Studies on the constituents of Pueraria lobata. Chem Pharm Bull 36:1174–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang R, Lau K, Lam H, Yam W, Leung L, Choi K, Waye M, Mak TCW, Woo K, Fung K (2005) A comparative study on aqueous root extracts of Pueraria thomsonii and Pueraria lobata by antioxidant assay and HPLC fingerprint analysis. J Ethnopharmacol 96:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu HN, Zhang YX, He CH (2007) Ultrasonically assisted extraction of isoflavones from stem of Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi and its mathematical model. Chin J Chem Eng 15:861–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Niiho Y, Nakajima Y, Yamazaki T, Okamoto M, Tsuchihashi R, Kodera M, Kinjo J, Nohara T (2010) Simultaneous analysis of isoflavones and saponins in Pueraria flowers using HPLC coupled to an evaporative light scattering detector and isolation of a new isoflavone diglucoside. J Nat Med 64:313–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandrasekar D, Madhusudhana K, Ramakrishna S, Diwan PV (2006) Determination of DPPH free radical scavenging activity by reversed-phase HPLC: a sensitive screening method for polyherbal formulations. J Pharm Biomed Anal 40:460–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi SY, Zhang YP, Zhou HH, Huang KL, Jiang XY (2010) Screening and identification of radical scavengers from Neo-Taraxacum siphonanthum by online rapid screening method and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. J Immunoass Immunochem 31:233–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tapia A, Rodriguez J, Theoduloz C, Lopez S, Feresin GE, Schmeda-Hirschmann G (2004) Free radical scavengers and antioxidants from Baccharis grisebachii. J Ethnopharmacol 95:155–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dapkevicius A, van Beek TA, Niederländer HAG (2011) Evaluation and comparison of two improved techniques for the on-line detection of antioxidants in liquid chromatography eluates. J Chromatogr A 912:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Blois MS (1958) Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 181:1199–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koşar M, Dorman HJD, Başer KHC, Hiltunen R (2004) Screening of free radical scavenging compounds in water extracts of mentha samples using a postcolumn derivatization method. J Agric Food Chem 52:5004–5010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li YJ, Chen J, Li Y, Li Q, Zheng YF, Fu Y, Li P (2011) Screening and characterization of natural antioxidants in four Glycyrrhiza species by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quardrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:8181–8191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dittmann K, Gerhäuser C, Klimo K, Hamburger M (2004) HPLC-based activity profiling of Salvia miltiorrhiza for MAO A and iNOS inhibitory activities. Planta Med 70:909–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li SL, Li P, Sheng LH, Li RY, Qi LW, Zhang LY (2006) Live cell extraction and HPLC-MS analysis for predicting bioactive components of traditional Chinese medicines. J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:576–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Farag MA, Huhman DV, Lei Z, Sumner LW (2007) Metabolic profiling and systematic identification of flavonoids and isoflavonoids in roots and cell suspension cultures of Medicago truncatula using HPLC-UV-ESI-MS and GC-MS. Phytochemistry 68:342–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin CC, Wu CI, Sheu SJ (2005) Determination of 12 Pueraria components by high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 28:1785–1795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Scientific Foundation of China (no. 21005089), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (no. 10JJ4006), the freedom explore Program of Central South University (201012200015), the Shenghua Yuying project of Central South University, the open fund of the State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, and aid program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team (Chemicals of Forestry Resources and Development of Forest Products) in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shu-Yun Shi or Mi-Jun Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, YP., Shi, SY., Xiong, X. et al. Comparative evaluation of three methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography analysis combined with a 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay for the rapid screening of antioxidants from Pueraria lobata flowers. Anal Bioanal Chem 402, 2965–2976 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5722-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5722-3

Keywords

Navigation