Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of non-viable whole barley, wheat and sorghum grains using near-infrared hyperspectral data and chemometrics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undesired germination of cereal grains diminishes process utility and economic return. Pre-germination, the term used to describe untimely germination, leads to reduced viability of a grain sample. Accurate and rapid identification of non-viable grain is necessary to reduce losses associated with pre-germination. Viability of barley, wheat and sorghum grains was investigated with near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Principal component analyses applied to cleaned hyperspectral images were able to differentiate between viable and non-viable classes in principal component (PC) five for barley and sorghum and in PC6 for wheat. An OH stretching and deformation combination mode (1,920–1,940 nm) featured in the loading line plots of these PCs; this water-based vibrational mode was a major contributor to the viable/non-viable differentiation. Viable and non-viable classes for partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were assigned from PC scores that correlated with incubation time. The PLS-DA predictions of the viable proportion correlated well with the viable proportion observed using the tetrazolium test. Partial least squares regression analysis could not be used as a source of contrast in the hyperspectral images due to sampling issues.

PCA score image for barley kernels

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gruwel MLH, Yin XS, Edney MJ, Schroeder SW, MacGregor AW, Abrams S (2002) Barley viability during storage: use of magnetic resonance as a potential tool to study viability loss. J Agric Food Chem 50(4):667–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fincher GB, Stone BA (1993) Physiology and biochemistry of germination in barley. In: MacGregor AW, Bhatty RS (eds) Barley: chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, pp 247–294

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smail VW, Fritz AK, Wetzel DL (2006) Chemical imaging of intact seeds with NIR focal plane array assists plant breeding. Vib Spectrosc 42(2):215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh CB, Jayas DS, Paliwal J, White NDG (2009) Detection of sprouted and midge-damaged wheat kernels using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Cereal Chem 86(3):256–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewar J, Taylor JRN, Berjak P (1997) Determination of improved steeping conditions for sorghum malting. J Cereal Sci 26(1):129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pagano EA, Benech-Arnold RL, Wawrzkiewicz M, Steinbach HS (1997) Alpha-amylase activity in developing sorghum caryopses from sprouting resistant and susceptible varieties. The role of ABA and GAs on its regulation. Ann Bot 79(1):13–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kent NL, Evers AD (1994) Kent’s technology of cereals. Elsevier, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohan A (2008) Pre-harvest sprouting in cereals: a global scenario. Current Science 94(6):704–705

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skerritt JH, Heywood RH (2000) A five-minute field test for on-farm detection of pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. Crop Sci 40(3):742–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Woonton BW, Jacobsen JV, Sherkat F, Stuart IM (2005) Changes in germination and malting quality during storage of barley. J I Brewing 111(1):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruger JE (1994) Enzymes of sprouted wheat and their possible technological significance. In: Bushuk W, Rasper VF (eds) Wheat production, properties and quality. Blackie, Glasgow, pp 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paliwal S, Baskin CC, Delouche JC (1990) The relationship between the tetrazolium test, soil cold test, and standard germination test in assessing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) seed quality. J Seed Technol 14(1):56–60

    Google Scholar 

  13. AACC (2010) Approved methods of the AACC. Determination of falling number (method 56-81B). American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bueckert RA, Lefol EB, Harvey BL (2007) Early detection of non-visible sprouting in barley seed using rapid viscosity analysis. Can J Plant Sci 87(1):3–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Neethirajan S, Jayas DS, White NDG (2007) Detection of sprouted wheat kernels using soft X-ray image analysis. J Food Eng 81(3):509–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koc H, Smail VW, Wetzel DL (2008) Reliability of InGaAs focal plane array imaging of wheat germination at early stages. J Cereal Sci 48(2):394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xing JA, Van Hung P, Symons S, Shahin M, Hatcher D (2009) Using a short wavelength infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging system to predict alpha amylase activity in individual Canadian western wheat kernels. Sens Instrumen Food Qual 3(4):211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis EN, Kidder LH (2010) Technologies and practical considerations for implementing near-infrared chemical imaging. In: Sasic S, Ozaki Y (eds) Raman, infrared and near-infrared chemical imaging. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  19. Manley M, Williams P, Nilsson D, Geladi P (2009) Near infrared hyperspectral imaging for the evaluation of endosperm texture in whole yellow maize (Zea maize L.) kernels. J Agric Food Chem 57(19):8761–8769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Contal L, Leon V, Downey G (2002) Detection and quantification of apple adulteration in strawberry and raspberry purees using visible and near infrared spectroscopy. J Near Infrared Spec 10(4):289–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Cereal samples were kindly provided by the Agricultural Research Council—Small Grain Institute, PANNAR and South African Breweries Malting. This project was funded by the Winter Cereal Trust (South Africa) and the Sorghum Trust (South Africa). Paulina Engelbrecht wishes to thank Food Bev SETA and Stellenbosch University for Master's bursaries. Cushla McGoverin acknowledges funding for postdoctoral research provided by the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa (Grant number 71390). The South African-Swedish Research Partnership Programme Bilateral Agreement, NRF, (UID 60958) is acknowledged for funding to work at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (VR. 348-2006-6715). In addition, Oskar Jonsson (Umbio AB, Umeå, Sweden) is thanked for the use of the SisuCHEMA imaging system and assistance with imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marena Manley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGoverin, C.M., Engelbrecht, P., Geladi, P. et al. Characterisation of non-viable whole barley, wheat and sorghum grains using near-infrared hyperspectral data and chemometrics. Anal Bioanal Chem 401, 2283–2289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5291-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5291-x

Keywords

Navigation