Skip to main content
Log in

Scientometric analysis of national university research performance in analytical chemistry on the basis of academic publications: Italy as case study

  • Feature Article
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 23 October 2010

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. ISI Web of Knowledge (2008) Journal Citation Reports. A bibliometric analysis of science journals in the ISI database. Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Thomson Reuters, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbstein FH (1993) Scientometrics 28:349–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Swinbanks D, Nathan R (1997) Nature 389:113–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Makino J (1998) Scientometrics 43:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun T (1999) Scientometrics 45:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun T, Schubert A, Schubert G (2002) Anal Chem 74:477A–479A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kyvik S (2003) Scientometrics 58:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moed HF (2005) Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seglen O (1997) Br Med J 314:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adam D (2002) Nature 415:726–729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warner J (2003) Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 30:26–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. EASE European Association of Science Editors statement on impact factors (2008) http://www.ease.org.uk/artman2/uploads/1/EASE_statement_IFs_final.pdf Apr. 20. Accessed on 2010-02-17

  13. Balaban AT (1996) Scientometrics 37:495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schubert A, Braun T (1996) Scientometrics 36:311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kostoff RN (1997) Scientometrics 36:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramirez AM, Garcia EO, Del Rio JA (2000) Scientometrics 47:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pudovkin AI, Garfield E (2004) Rank-normalized impact factor: a way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting 41:507–515

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A (2005) Biomed Digit Libr 2:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Yochai W, Saechiew M (2005) Scientometrics 65:293–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sombatsompop N, Markpin TJ (2005) Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 56:676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garfield E (2006) J A Med Assoc 295:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lundberg J (2007) J Informetrics 1:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoeffel C (1998) Allergy 53:1225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. King AK (2004) Nature 430:311–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1987) Evaluation of research. A Selection of Current Practices. OECD Paris

  26. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1997) The evaluation of Scientific Research: Selected Experiences. OECD Paris

  27. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009) Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2009 (a biannual series). OECD Paris

  28. Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A (1989) Trends Anal Chem 8:281–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A (1989) Trends Anal Chem 8:316–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Braun T, Schubert A (1990) Trends Anal Chem 9:176–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Valcarcel M (1993) Trends Anal Chem 12:IX–XIII

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomaidis NS, Georgiou CA, Calokerinos AC (2004) Anal Chim Acta 505:3–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kastelan-Macan M, Klaic B (2000) Croat Chem Acta 73:1–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Muñoz de la Peña A, Pulgarin A (1992) Anal Proceed 29:517–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Georgiou CA, Thomaidis NS (2001) Trends Anal Chem 20:462–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Téllez H, Vadillo JM (2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 397:1477–1484; doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3732-6

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valcarcel M, Rios A (1995) Trends Anal Chem 14:94–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodenas-Torralba E, Morales-Rubio A, de la Guardia M (2006) Spectr Lett 39:513–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Braun T, Schubert A (1991) Trends Anal Chem 10:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Braun T, Bujdosó E, Schubert A (1987) Literature of analytical chemistry: a scientometric evaluation. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  41. Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A (1990) Trends Anal Chem 9:278–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Burke M (2001) Anal Chem 73:595A–597A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Italian law 9 January 2009 no. 1, Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 10 novembre 2008, n. 180, recante disposizioni urgenti per il diritto allo studio, la valorizzazione del merito e la qualità del sistema universitario e della ricerca, Italian Official Bull. 9 January 2009 no. 6, art. 1. http://www.parlamento.it/parlam/leggi/09001l.htm. Accessed February 17, 2010

  44. Italian National University Council (CUN) Documento di lavoro del Consiglio Universitario Nazionale su: indicatori di attività scientifica e di ricerca, Session of 16–18 December 2008, http://www.cun.it/documenti/documenti-di-lavoro/2009/indicatori-attività-scientifica-ricerca-.aspx Accessed February 17, 2010

  45. DM 89/2009. Decree of the Minister of Education, Universities and Research of Italy, no. 89, July 28th 2009, Valutazione dei titoli e delle pubblicaizoni scientifiche, http://www.miur.it/0006Menu_C/0012Docume/0015Atti_M/7921Valuta_cf2.htm. Accessed February 17, 2010

  46. SciFinder (2009) Chemical Abstract Service, American Chemical Society. Washington, D.C., USA

  47. Hirsch JE (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569–16572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. ISI Web of Science (2010) Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Thomson Reuters, New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. CAplus (2009) Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., USA

  50. MEDLINE (2009) Community of Science, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

  51. Van Raan AFJ (2006) Scientometrics 67:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  52. Prathap G (2006) Current Science 91:1439

    Google Scholar 

  53. Csajbók E, Berhidi A, Vasas L, Schubert A (2007) Scientometrics 73:91–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sen BK (1992) J Document 48:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Batista PD, Campiteli MG, Kinouchi O, Martinez AS (2006) Scientometrics 68:179–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Glänzel W (2006) Scientometrics 67:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Van Noorden R, Hirsch index ranks top chemists, Chemistry World, 23 April 2007, updated 11 March 2011. Retrieved 31 March 2011; http://www.rsc.org/images/H-indexMarch2010_tcm18-85867.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Ettore Novellino, a member of the Italian National University Council (CUN), for the initial advice that we should perform electronic retrieval of university (full) professors’ publications in order to obtain the basic information to answer the Ministerial request concerning a bibliometric reference to be included in the minimum requirements in academic competition regulations, to Luigi Campanella, the President of the Italian Chemical Society (SCI), for his suggestion that we should publish the results of the work, and to Maria Careri and Aldo Roda, the President and the Past-President of the Analytical Chemistry Division of the SCI, for stimulating and useful discussions. We are also grateful to the Polytechnic University of Marche for its financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Truzzi.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4286-3

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 1.24 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annibaldi, A., Truzzi, C., Illuminati, S. et al. Scientometric analysis of national university research performance in analytical chemistry on the basis of academic publications: Italy as case study. Anal Bioanal Chem 398, 17–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3804-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3804-7

Keywords

Navigation