Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How should citations to articles in high- and low-impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After a brief discussion on the normalization factors allowing the quantitative comparison between various disciplines, a formula is proposed for taking into account the value of citations to papers published in journals with different impact factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E. Garfield, The ‘obliteration phenomenon’ in science - and the advantage of being obliterated!,Current Contents, December 22, 1975, No. 51/52 (1975), reprinted inEssays of an Information Scientist, 2 (1974–1976) 396–398;E. Garfield, Uses and misuses of citation frequency,Current Contents, October 28, 1985, No. 43 (1985), reprinted inEssays of an Information Scientist, 8 (1985) 403–409.

  2. E. Garfield,Citation Indexing. Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology, and Humanities, Wiley, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Cross-field normalization of scientometrics indicators,Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact,Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988) 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Subject field characteristic scores and scales in assessing research performance,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 267–292.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Hirst, Discipline impact factors: a method for determining copre journal list,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (1978) 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Marshakova-Shaikevich, The standard impact factor of science fields and scientific journals,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (1972) 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Garfield, The impact factor,Current Contents, June 20, No. 25 (1994) 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. F. Aguillo, Increasing the between-year stability of the impact factor in the Science Citation Index.Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Garfield (Ed.),Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports. A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Database. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, from 1975 annually; from 1995 also available on CD-ROM.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Organic Chemistry, Polytechnic University, Spl. Independentei 313, 77207, Bucharest, (Roumania)

    A. T. Balaban

Authors
  1. A. T. Balaban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balaban, A.T. How should citations to articles in high- and low-impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth?. Scientometrics 37, 495–498 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019260

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019260

Keywords

Search

Navigation