Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental designs dedicated to the evaluation of a membrane extraction method: membrane-assisted solvent extraction for compounds having different polarities by means of gas chromatography–mass detection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Membrane-assisted solvent extraction was applied for the determination of different classes of compounds in water, having K o/w (octanol–water partition coefficient) values between 101 (aniline) and 108 (methyl stearate), by means of experimental designs. Four solvents were investigated—propan-2-ol, ethyl acetate, diisopropyl ether and cyclohexane—as well as extraction time, temperature, salt impact, pH and methanol addition. The best choice was diisopropyl ether, 50 °C, 30 min and an addition of 3 g of sodium chloride at pH 2 for polar compounds. The relative standard deviation (n = 3) was found in the range from 5 to 17%. Recoveries ranged between 34 and 100%. Membrane-assisted solvent extraction was successfully applied to a fast screening method dedicated to an unknown wastewater sample.

Experimental setup for membrane assisted solvent extraction MASE

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitra S (ed) (2003) Sample preparation, techniques in analytical chemistry, vol 162. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Bruin LS, Josephy PD, Pawliszyn JB (1998) J Anal Chem 70:1986–1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pawliszyn J (ed) (1997) Solid phase microextraction, theory and practice. Wiley-VCH, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pawliszyn J (2002) In: Pawliszyn J (ed) Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol 37. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 389–477

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baltussen E, Cramers CA, Sandra PJF (2002) J Anal Bioanal Chem 373:3–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Benanou D, Acobas F, De Roubin MR, David F, Sandra P (2003) J Anal Bioanal Chem 376:69–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quintana JB, Rodriguez I (2006) J Anal Bioanal Chem 384:1447–1461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jönsson JA, Mathiasson L (1999) Trends Anal Chem 18:325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Urtiaga AM, Ortiz MA (1992) Ind Eng Chem Res 31:1745–1753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao L, Zhu L, Lee HK (2002) J Chromatogr A 963:239–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Y, Jönsson JA, Mathiasson L (1998) J Anal Chem 70:946–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyötyläinen T, Andersson T (2001) J Sep Sci 24:544–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li N, Deng C (2005) J Anal Biochem 342:318–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keith S (ed) (1998) Handbook of industrial membranes. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gabelman A, Hwang ST (1999) J Membr Sci 159:61–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chia KJ, Huang SD (2006) J Chromatogr A 1103:158–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen G, Lee HK (2002) J Anal Chem 74:648–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hauser B, Popp P (2001) J Sep Sci 24:551–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gomes Zuin V, Schellin M (2006) J Chromatogr A 1114:180–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schellin M, Popp P (2006) J Chromatogr A 1103:211–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hauser B, Popp P, Kleine-Benne E (2002) J Chromatogr A 963:27–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schellin M, Popp P (2003) J Chromatogr A 1020:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziemer W, Wortberg M (2004) Application note. Gerstel, Mühleim an der Ruhr

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schellin M, Popp P (2005) J Chromatogr A 1072:37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schellin M, Hauser B, Popp P (2004) J Chromatogr A 1040:251–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hauser B, Schellin M, Popp P (2004) Anal Chem 76:6029–6038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goupy J (ed) (2005) Pratiquer les plans d’expériences. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sado G, Sado MC (eds) (1996) Les plans d’expériences: de l’expérimentation à l’assurance qualité. AFNOR, La Plaine Saint-Denis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Gerstel (Mühleim an der Ruhr, Germany) and Research Institute for Chromatography (Belgium) for help and technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Analytical Research Department, Centre de Recherche sur l’eau, Veolia Environnement, Chemin de la digue, 78600, Maisons Laffitte, France

    Carole Vincelet & David Benanou

  2. Chemin de Saint-Jacques, 13100, Aix-en-Provence, France

    Jean Marc Roussel

Authors
  1. Carole Vincelet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean Marc Roussel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Benanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carole Vincelet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincelet, C., Roussel, J.M. & Benanou, D. Experimental designs dedicated to the evaluation of a membrane extraction method: membrane-assisted solvent extraction for compounds having different polarities by means of gas chromatography–mass detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 396, 2285–2292 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3449-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3449-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation