Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of neem oils by LC–MS and degradation kinetics of azadirachtin-A in a controlled environment

Characterization of degradation products by HPLC–MS–MS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since it was first isolated, the oil extracted from seeds of neem (Azadirachtin indica A juss) has been extensively studied in terms of its efficacy as an insecticide. Several industrial formulations are produced as emulsifiable solutions containing a stated titer of the active ingredient azadirachtin-A (AZ-A). The work reported here is the characterization of a formulation of this insecticide marketed under the name of Neem-azal T/S and kinetic studies of the major active ingredient of this formulation. We initially performed liquid–liquid extraction to isolate the neem oil from other ingredients in the commercial mixture. This was followed by a purification using flash chromatography and semi-preparative chromatography, leading to 13C NMR identification of structures such as azadirachtin-A, azadirachtin-B, and azadirachtin-H. The neem extract was also characterized by HPLC–MS using two ionization sources, APCI (atmospheric pressure chemical ionization) and ESI (electrospray ionization) in positive and negative ion modes of detection. This led to the identification of other compounds present in the extract—azadirachtin-D, azadirachtin-I, deacetylnimbin, deacetylsalannin, nimbin, and salannin. The comparative study of data gathered by use of the two ionization sources is discussed and shows that the ESI source enables the largest number of structures to be identified. In a second part, kinetic changes in the main product (AZ-A) were studied under precise conditions of pH (2, 4, 6, and 8), temperature (40 to 70 °C), and light (UV, dark room and in daylight). This enabled us to determine the degradation kinetics of the product (AZ-A) over time. The activation energy of the molecule (75±9 kJ mol−1) was determined by examining thermal stability in the range 40 to 70 °C. The degradation products of this compound were identified by use of HPLC–MS and HPLC–MS–MS. The results enabled proposal of a chemical degradation reaction route for AZ-A under different conditions of pH and temperature. The data show that at room temperature and pH between 4 and 5 the product degrades into two preferential forms that are hydrolyzed to a single product over time and as a function of pH change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Butterworth JH, Morgan ED (1968) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 23–24

  2. Mordue A, Blackwell J (1993) J Insect Physiol 39:903–924

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivbijaro M (1990) Insect Sci Appl 11:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naqvi SNH, Ahmed SO, Mohammad FA (1991) Pak J Pharm Sci 4:71–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sundaram KMS (1996) J Environ Sci Health B 31:913–948

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schiffers BC, Dieye A, Ntema P, Dieye B, Ekukole G (1997) Med Fac Landbouww Univ Gent 62:225–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Govindachari TR, Sandhya G, Ganeshraj SP (1992) Indian J Chem 31B:295–298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaun J, David ME (1997) J Chromatogr A 761:53–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thejavathi R, Shirish RY, Ravindranath B (1995) J Chromatogr A 705:374–379

    Google Scholar 

  10. Govindachari TR, Suresh G, Gopalakrishnan G (1995) J Liq Chromatogr 18:3465–3471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundaram KMS, Curry J (1993) J Liq Chromatogr 16:3275–3290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundaram KMS, Sloane L, Curry J (1993) J Environ Sci Health B 28:221–241

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamasaki BR, Klocke JA, Lee MS, Stone GA, Darlington MV (1986) J Chromatogr 356:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hull CJ Jr, Dutton WR, Switzer BS (1993) J Chromatogr 633:300–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Govindachari TR, Sandhya G, Ganeshraj SP (1990) J Chromatogr 513:389–391

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaun J, David EM, Wilson ID, Spraul M, Hofmann M (1994) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1:1499–1502

    Google Scholar 

  17. Govindachari TR, Sandhya Ganeshraj GSP (1992) J Nat Prod 55:596–601

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ley SV, Anderson JC, Blaney WM, Jones PS, Lidert Z, Morgan ED, Robinson NG, Santafianos D, Simmonds MS, Toogood PL (1989) Tetrahedron 45:5175–5192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bokel M, Cramer R, Gutzeit H, Reeb S, Kraus W (1990) Tetrahedron 46:775–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kraus W, Bokel M (1981) Chem Ber 114:267–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaaf O, Jarvis AP, Andrew van der Esch S, Giagnacovo G, Oldham NJ (2000) J Chromatogr A 886:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laidler KL (1984) J Chem Educ 61:494–498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundaram KMS, Sloane L, Curry J (1995) J Liq Chromatogr 18:363–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Florence Grenier-Loustalot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrek, S., Paisse, O. & Grenier-Loustalot, MF. Analysis of neem oils by LC–MS and degradation kinetics of azadirachtin-A in a controlled environment. Anal Bioanal Chem 378, 753–763 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2377-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2377-0

Keywords

Navigation