Abstract
Chemical reactivity properties such as regioselectivity, electrophilicity and nucleophilicity are important chemical concepts, yet their understanding and quantification are still far from being accomplished. Applying density functional theory (DFT) to appreciate these properties is one route to pursue in the literature. In this work, we present a comparative study to benchmark two approaches in DFT to predict regioselectivity, electrophilicity and nucleophilicity: one with the Hirshfeld charge and the other with the Fukui function. We also examine the impact of 15 different ways to compute atomic charges on the performance of their predictions about these chemical reactivity properties. Our results show that the Hirshfeld charge is able to reliably determine regioselectivity and simultaneously accurately quantify both electrophilicity and nucleophilicity. The Fukui function behaves reasonably well for the prediction of electrophilicity but performs poorly for nucleophilicity. Among all other atomic charges examined in this study, it is only the Voronoi deformation density charge that yields the similar result as the Hirshfeld charge. As the first systematic benchmark study in the literature to compare the two available approaches in DFT about reactivity predictions, this work should fill in the needed knowledge gap and provide an impetus for the future development of chemical reactivity theory using DFT language.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parr RG, Szentpály LV, Liu S (1999) J Am Chem Soc 121(9):1922–1924
Jaramillo P, Pérez P, Contreras R, Tiznado W, Fuentealba P (2006) J Phys Chem A 110(26):8181–8187
Ayers PW, Anderson JSM, Bartolotti LJ (2005) Int J Quantum Chem 101(5):520–534
Ayers PW, Anderson JSM, Rodriguez JI, Jawed Z (2005) Phys Chem Chem Phys 7(9):1918–1925
Chattaraj PK, Roy DR (2006) J Phys Chem A 110(40):11401–11403
Chattaraj PK (2001) J Phys Chem A 105(2):511–513
Smith MB, March J (2007) March’s advanced organic chemistry: reactions, mechanisms, and structure. Wiley, New York
Baldwin JE (1976) J Chem Soc. Chem Commun 18:734–736
Fürst A, Plattner PA (1949) Helv Chim Acta 32(1):275–283
Yang W, Parr RG (1985) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 82(20):6723–6726
Geerlings P, De Proft F (2008) Phys Chem Chem Phys 10(21):3028–3042
Parr RG, Yang W (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106(14):4049–4050
Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford University Press, New York
Nalewajski RF, Parr RG (2001) J Phys Chem A 105(31):7391–7400
Parr RG, Ayers PW, Nalewajski RF (2005) J Phys Chem A 109(17):3957–3959
Ayers PW (2006) Theor Chem Acc 115(5):370–378
Kullback S (2012) Information theory and statistics. Dover Publications, New York
Nalewajski RF (2006) Information theory of molecular systems. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Liu S, Rong C, Lu T (2014) J Phys Chem A 118(20):3698–3704
Mayr H, Patz M (1994) Angew Chem Int Ed 33(9):938–957
Mayr H, Bug T, Gotta MF, Hering N, Irrgang B, Janker B, Kempf B, Loos R, Ofial AR, Remennikov G, Schimmel H (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123(39):9500–9512
Lucius R, Loos R, Mayr H (2002) Angew Chem Int Ed 41(1):91–95
Mayr H, Kempf B, Ofial AR (2003) Acc Chem Res 36(1):66–77
Hirshfeld FL (1977) Theor Chim Acta 44(2):129–138
Fonseca Guerra C, Handgraaf J-W, Baerends EJ, Bickelhaupt FM (2004) J Comput Chem 25(2):189–210
Mulliken RS (1955) J Chem Phys 23(10):1833–1840
Mulliken RS (1955) J Chem Phys 23(10):1841–1846
Mulliken RS (1955) J Chem Phys 23(12):2338–2342
Bruhn G, Davidson ER, Mayer I, Clark AE (2006) Int J Quantum Chem 106(9):2065–2072
Ros P, Schuit G (1966) Theor Chim Acta 4(1):1–12
Stout E, Politzer P (1968) Theor Chim Acta 12(5):379–386
Bickelhaupt FM, Van Eikema Hommes NJR, Fonseca Guerra C, Baerends EJ (1996) Organometallics 15(13):2923–2931
Becke AD (1988) J Chem Phys 88(4):2547–2553
Lu T, Chen F (2012) J Theor Comput Chem 11(01):163–183
Breneman CM, Wiberg KB (1990) J Comput Chem 11(3):361–373
Besler BH, Merz KM Jr, Kollman PA (1990) J Comput Chem 11(4):431–439
Bader RFW (1985) Acc Chem Res 18(1):9–15
Bultinck P, Alsenoy CV, Ayers PW, Carbó-Dorca R (2007) J Chem Phys 126(14):144111
Marenich AV, Jerome SV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (2012) J Chem Theor Comput 8(2):527–541
Mortier WJ, Van Genechten K, Gasteiger J (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107(4):829–835
Ayers PW, Levy M (2000) Theor Chem Acc 103(3):353–360
Yang W, Mortier WJ (1986) J Am Chem Soc 108:5708–5711
Bultinck P, Fias S, Alsenoy CV, Ayers PW, Carbo-Dora R (2007) J Chem Phys 127:034102
Miranda-Quintana RA (2016) Chem Phys Lett 658:328–330
Nalewajski RF (2000) Parr RG 97(16):8879–8882
Matta CF, Sichinga M, Ayers PW (2011) Chem Phys Lett 514(4):379–383
Rong C, Lu T, Liu SB (2014) J Chem Phys 140(2):024109
Cao X, Rong C, Zhong A, Lu T, Liu SB (2018) J Comput Chem 39(2):117–129
Liu SB, Liu L, Yu D, Rong C, Lu T (2018) Phys Chem Chem Phys 20(3):1408–1420
Liu SB, Rong C, Lu T, Hu H (2018) J Phys Chem A 122(11):3087–3095
Rong C, Zhao D, Yu D, Liu SB (2018) Phys Chem Chem Phys 20(26):17990–17998
Rong C, Zhao D, Zhou T, Liu S, Yu D, Liu SB (2019) J Phys Chem Lett 10(8):1716–1721
Liu S, Zhao D, Rong C, Lu T, Liu SB (2019) J Chem Phys 150(20):204106
Wang B, Yu D, Zhao D, Rong C, Liu SB (2019) Chem Phys Lett 730:451–459
Wu J, Yu D, Liu S, Rong C, Zhong A, Chattaraj PK, Liu SB (2019) J Phys Chem A 123(31):6751–6760
Xiao X, Cao X, Zhao D, Rong C, Liu S (2019) Acta Phys Chim Sin. https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906034
Yu D, Rong C, Lu T, Chattaraj PK, De Proft F, Liu SB (2017) Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(28):18635–18645
Yu D, Rong C, Lu T, De Proft F, Liu SB (2018) ACS Omega 3(12):18370–18379
Yu D, Rong C, Lu T, De Proft F, Liu SB (2018) Acta Phys-Chim Sin 34(6):639–649
Yu D, Stuyver T, Rong C, Alonso M, Lu T, De Proft F, Geerlings P, Liu SB (2019) Phys Chem Chem Phys 21(33):18195–18210
Zhao D, Liu S, Rong C, Zhong A, Liu SB (2018) ACS Omega 3(12):17986–17990
Zhou T, Liu S, Yu D, Zhao D, Rong C, Liu SB (2019) Chem Phys Lett 716:192–198
Liu SB, Rong C, Lu T (2014) J Phys Chem A 118(20):3698–3704
Zhou X, Rong C, Lu T, Liu SB (2014) Acta Phys Chim Sin 30(11):2055–2062
Liu SB (2016) Acta Phys Chim Sin 32(1):98–118
Ditchfield R, Hehre WJ, Pople JA (1971) J Chem Phys 54(2):724–728
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Theor Chem Acc 120(1):215–241
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson G (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision D.01, Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT
Cossi M, Rega N, Scalmani G, Barone V (2003) J Comput Chem 24(6):669–681
Lu T, Chen F (2012) J Comput Chem 33(5):580–592
Acknowledgements
C.R. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21503076), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (No. 17C0949) and Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2017JJ3201). P.K.C. would like to thank the DST, New Delhi for the J. C. Bose National Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Published as part of the special collection of articles derived from the Chemical Concepts from Theory and Computation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, B., Rong, C., Chattaraj, P.K. et al. A comparative study to predict regioselectivity, electrophilicity and nucleophilicity with Fukui function and Hirshfeld charge. Theor Chem Acc 138, 124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-019-2515-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-019-2515-1