Abstract
It is proved that the evaluation of the Coulomb potential and the calculation of its matrix elements can be carried out in separate steps whose costs formally increase as the square of the number of basis functions. The resulting method for computing the Coulomb matrix is reported, and its main features are tested with a trial program for Slater functions. A comparison of the Coulomb matrices obtained with this method and those computed from the repulsion integrals shows that the current procedure is potentially exact, highly accurate in practice, and much less expensive. The effects of basis product cutoff and long-range separation have been analyzed finding that the method tends to linear scaling with the size of the system. Moreover, the storage requirements are very low since two-electron integrals are completely absent, and it is well suited to be used in the density functional context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rico JF, López R, Ramírez G (1999) J Chem Phys 110(9):4213
Rico JF, López R, Ema I, Ramírez G (2002) J Chem Phys 117(2):533
Rico JF, López R, Ema I, Ramírez G (2002) J Chem Theory Comput 1:1083
Rico JF, López R, Ema I, Ramírez G (2007) Theor Chem Account 118:709
Rico JF, López R, Alonso JIF (1984) Phys Rev A 29:6
Rico JF, López R, Paniagua M, Alonso JIF (1984) Phys Rev A 29:11
Monkhorst HJ, Harris FE (1969) Chem Phys Lett 3(7):537
Clementi E (1972) Proc Nat Acad Sci 69(10):2942
Baerends EJ, Ellis DE, Ros P (1973) Chem Phys 2(1):41
Whitten JL (1973) J Chem Phys 58:4496
Dunlap BI, Connolly JWD, Sabin JR (1979) J Chem Phys 71:3396
Andzelm J, Wimmer E (1992) J Chem Phys 96(2):1280
Vahtras O, Almlöf J, Feyereisen MW (1993) Chem Phys Lett 213(5–6):514
Treutler O, Ahlrichs R (1995) J Chem Phys 102(1):346
Eichkorn K, Treutler O, Öhm H, Haser M, Ahlrichs R (1995) Chem Phys Lett 240(4):283
Eichkorn K, Weigend F, Treutler O, Ahlrichs R (1997) Theor Chem Account 97:119
Cohen AJ, Handy NC (2002) J Chem Phys 117(4):1470
Watson MA, Handy NC, Cohen AJ (2003) J Chem Phys 119(13):6475
Aquilante F, Lindh R, Pedersen TB (2007) J Chem Phys 127:114107
Pedersen TB, Aquilante F, Lindh R (2009) Theor Chem Acc 124:1
Rico JF, López R, Ema I, Ramírez G, Ludeña E (2004) J Comput Chem 25(11):1355
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (1980) Table of integrals, series and products, 4th edn. Academic Press, New York
Rico JF, López R, Ema I, Ramírez G (2004) J Comput Chem 25(11):1347
Steinborn EO, Ruedenberg K (1973) Rotation and translation of regular and irregular solid spherical harmonics (Elsevier, 1973). Advances in Quantum Chemistry, vol 7, pp 1–81
Lebedev VI (1976) Dokl Akad Nauk 231(1):32
Lebedev VI, Skorokhodov AL (1992) Dokl Akad Nauk 324(3):519
Lebedev VI (1994) Dokl Akad Nauk 338(4):454
Lebedev VI, Laikov DN, (1999) Dokl Akad Nauk 366(6):741
Kakhiani K, Tsereteli K, Tsereteli P (2009) Comput Phys Commun 1806:256
Homeier HHH, Steinborn EO (1991) Int J Quantum Chem 39(4):625
Homeier HHH, Steinborn EO (1992) Int J Quantum Chem 41(4):399
Ema I, García de la Vega JM, Ramírez G, López R, Rico JF, Meissner J, J Paldus (2003) J Comput Chem 24(7):859
Rico JF, López R, Ema I, Ramírez G (2004) J Comput Chem 25(16):1987
Strain MC, Scuseria GE, Frisch MJ (1996) Science 271:51
White CA, Johnson BG, Gill PM, Head-Gordon M (1994) Chem Phys Lett 230:8
Challacombe M, Schwegler E, Almlof J (1996) J Chem Phys 104:4685
Beebe N, Linderberg J (1977) Int J Quantum Chem 12:683
Mamby FR, Knowles P (2001) Phys Rev Lett 87:163001
Mamby F, Knowles P, Lloyd A (2001) J Chem Phys 115:9144
Polly R, Werner H, Mamby F, Knowles P (2004) Mol Phys 102(21–22):2311
Sierka M, Hogekamp A, Ahlrichs R (2003) J Chem Phys 118(20):9136
Weigend F, Kattannek M, Ahlrichs R (2009) J Chem Phys 130:164106
Weigend F (2006) Phys Chem Chem Phys 8:1057
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica (CTQ2007-63332).
Appendix
Appendix
Let ρA(r A ) and ρC(r C ) be two charge distributions fully enclosed by two spheres centered at R A and R C and with radii R A and R B, and let R AC ≡| R C − R A | ≥R A + R C. Its electrostatic interaction energy, E AC, can be obtained by combining the bipolar expansion of |r − r′|−1:
with the expansions in spherical harmonics of ρA(r A ) and ρC(r C ). This gives:
where α lmLMl+L, m' are the coefficients for the decomposition of products of spherical harmonics into spherical harmonics. The sum on m′, determined by \(\alpha_{l+L, m'}^{lm LM}\), contains two terms at most, and \(Q_{lm}^A\) and \(Q_{LM}^C\) are the multipolar moments related to the radial factors by:
with a likewise expression for \(Q_{LM}^C\).
In practice, the ρA(r A ) fragments extend to infinite but, since the radial factors have a quick decay (at least, exponential) one can estimate—for a fixed threshold—the size of the sphere that encloses the nonnegligible part of ρA(r A ). In a previous work [3], we showed that the ρA(r A ) given by DAM looks very much like the densities of the corresponding isolated atom, so that a conservative criterion would be to take for atoms in molecules the size of the spheres of the isolated atoms. This point has been tested and verified finding that a radius between 5 and 6 bohr should give sufficient accuracy but, for prudential reasons, we take 6.5 bohr in this trial program.
Once this radius is fixed, C is considered as a neighbor of A if their spheres intersect each other (R AC < 13 bohr), and nonneighbor (or far away from A) otherwise. Notice that the set of atoms placed far away from A generates a constant potential region where ρA(r A ) is nonnegligible. This is the \(B_{lm}^A\) constant appearing in Eqs. 23–26 which, according to Eq. 43 reads:
where L max is the order of the highest atomic multipolar moment considered.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ema, I., López, R., Ramírez, G. et al. Direct calculation of the Coulomb matrix: Slater-type orbitals. Theor Chem Acc 128, 115–125 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-010-0771-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-010-0771-1