Skip to main content
Log in

On the accuracy of numerical Hartree–Fock energies

  • Published:
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

It is demonstrated that numerical Hartree–Fock (HF) energies reported in the literature in some cases have errors in the milliHartree range. The main cause of these errors is due to the use of too small a value for the ‘practical infinity’ parameter in the finite difference method for generating the results. By systematically investigating the convergence with respect to the computational parameters, HF energies accurate to at least 1 microHartree are generated for 42 diatomic systems containing first and second row elements, encompassing both cationic, neutral and anionic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery JA Jr, Ochterski JW, Petersson GA (1994) J Chem Phys 101:5900

    Google Scholar 

  2. (a) Curtiss, LA, Raghavachari K, Redfern PC, Rassolov V, Pople JA (1998) J Chem Phys 109:7764; (b) Curtiss A, Redfern PC, Raghavachari K, Pople JA (2002) Chem Phys Lett 359:390

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boese DA, Oren M, Atasoylu O, Martin JML, Kallay G, Gauss J (2004) J Chem Phys 120:4129

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuurman MS, Muir SR, Allen WD, Schaefer III HF (2004) J Chem Phys 120:11586

    Google Scholar 

  5. Halkier A, Helgaker T, Jorgensen P, Klopper W, Koch H, Olsen J, Wilson AK (1998) Chem Phys Lett 286:243

    Google Scholar 

  6. (a) Dunning TH Jr (1989) J Chem Phys 90:1007; (b) Peterson KA, Dunning TH Jr (2002) J Chem Phys 117:10548

  7. (a) Noga J, Valiron P, Klopper W (2001) J Chem Phys 115:2022; (b) Noga J, Klopper W (2003) Chem Phys Chem 4:32

  8. (a) Kobus J (1997) Adv Quant Chem 28:1; (b) McCullough EA Jr (1998) Encyclopedia of Comput Chem 3:1941

  9. (a) Jensen F (2001) J Chem Phys 115:9113; (b) Jensen F (2002) J Chem Phys 116:3502

  10. (a) Jensen F (2002) J Chem Phys 116:7372; (b) Jensen F (2002) J Chem Phys 117:9234; (c) Jensen F (2003) J Chem Phys 118:2459; (d) Jensen F, Helgaker T (2004) J Chem Phys 121:3462

  11. Kobus J, Laaksonen L, Sundholm D (1996) Comp Phys Commun 98:346

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roy AK, Thakkar AJ (2002) Chem Phys Lett 362:428

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laaksonen L, Müller-Plathe F, Diercksen GHF (1988) J Chem Phys 89:4903

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sundholm D, Pyykkö P, Laaksonen L (1985) Mol Phys 56:1411

  15. Halkier A, Helgaker T, Jørgensen P, Klopper W, Olsen J (1999) Chem Phys Lett 302:437

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kobus J, Moncrieff D, Wilson S (1999) Mol Phys 96:1559

  17. (a) Moncrieff D, Wilson S (1993) Chem Phys Lett 209:423; (b) Kobus J (1993) Chem Phys Lett 202:7; (c) Moncrieff D, Kobus J, Wilson S (1995) J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 28:4555

  18. Pyykkö P, Diercksen GHF, Müller-Plathe F, Laaksonen L (1987) Chem Phys Lett 134:575

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kobus J, Moncrieff D, Wilson S (1994) J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 27:2867

    Google Scholar 

  20. Müller-Plathe F, Laaksonen L (1989) Chem Phys Lett 160:175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, F. On the accuracy of numerical Hartree–Fock energies. Theor Chem Acc 113, 187–190 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-004-0618-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-004-0618-8

Keywords

Navigation