Abstract
Rationale
Although temporal patterns of drug self-administration in animals are known to be highly regular, this regularity has rarely been quantified or systematically compared across reinforcers.
Objectives
Over a range of unit doses, this study assessed: (1) the within-subject variability of inter-infusion intervals (latencies); (2) the estimated whole-body drug level at the time of self-infusion; (3) the within-subject variability of these drug levels; and (4) the statistical dependence between successive latencies, to determine whether regularity is maintained by compensatory, moment-to-moment adjustment of latencies.
Methods
Rats were trained with cocaine (10–1000 μg/kg per infusion, IV), remifentanil (an ultra-short acting opioid; 0.25–32 μg/kg per infusion, IV), or food (20–180 mg/delivery).
Results
Within subjects, latencies were most consistent from infusion to infusion at unit doses on the descending limb of the dose-response curve. However, the drug level at the time an infusion was initiated was actually least consistent at these doses. Sequential latencies showed only a weak autocorrelation for both drugs.
Conclusion
These results suggest that highly consistent response patterns are not simply a product of precise titration of drug levels. The weak autocorrelation between sequential latencies suggests that temporal regularity of responding is not maintained through compensatory adjustments of post-infusion pauses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1998) Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298–300
Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1999) Long-lasting increase in the set point for cocaine self-administration after escalation in rats. Psychopharmacology 146:303–312
Ahmed SH, Walker JR, Koob GF (2000) Persistent increase in the motivation to take heroin in rats with a history of drug escalation. Neuropsychopharmacology 22:413–421
Barbieri EJ, Ferko AP, DiGregorio GC, Ruch EK (1992) The presence of cocaine and benzoylecgonine in rat cerebrospinal fluid after the intravenous administration of cocaine. Life Sci 51:1739–1746
Barrett JE (1987) Nonpharmacological factors determining the behavioral effects of drugs. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, N.Y., pp 1493–1501
Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1985) Toxicity associated with long-term intravenous heroin and cocaine self-administration in the rat. JAMA 254:81–83
Bozarth MA, Gerber GJ, Wise RA(1980) Intracranial self-stimulation as a technique to study the reward properties of drugs of abuse. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:245–247
Carey RJ, Goodall EB, Procopio GF (1974) Differential effects of d-amphetamine on fixed ratio 30 performance maintained by food versus brain stimulation reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:193–198
Cox EH, Langemeijer MW, Gubbens-Stibbe JM, Muir KT, Danhof M (1999) The comparative pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite, GR90291, in a rat electroencephalographic model. Anesthesiology 90:535–544
DeVries AC, Pert A (1998) Conditioned increases in anxiogenic-like behavior following exposure to contextual stimuli associated with cocaine are mediated by corticotropin-releasing factor. Psychopharmacology 137:333–340
Dougherty J, Pickens R (1976) Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cocaine self-injection. In: Mule SJ (ed) Cocaine: chemical, biological, clinical, social and treatment aspect. CRC Press, Cleveland, pp 105–120
Ettenberg A, Geist TD (1993) Qualitative and quantitative differences in the operant runway behavior of rats working for cocaine and heroin reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44:191–198
Fitch TE, Roberts DC (1993) The effects of dose and access restrictions on the periodicity of cocaine self-administration in the rat. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:119–128
Gerber GJ, Wise RA (1989) Pharmacological regulation of intravenous cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats: a variable dose paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:527–531
Goldberg ST, Kelleher RT (1976) Behavior controlled by scheduled injections of cocaine in squirrel and rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 25:93–104
Goldberg SR, Spealman RD, Risner ME, Henningfield JE (1983) Control of behavior by intravenous nicotine injections in laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:1011–1020
Haidar SH, Moreton JE, Liang Z, Hoke JF, Muir KT, Eddington ND (1997) The pharmacokinetics and electroencephalogram response of remifentanil alone and in combination with esmolol in the rat. Pharmacol Res 14:1817–1823
Hubner CB, Koob GK (1990) Bromocriptine produces decreases in cocaine self-administration in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 3:101–108
Katz JL (1989) Drugs as reinforcers: pharmacological and behavioral factors. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 164–213
Lau CE, Sun L (2002) The pharmacokinetic determinants of the frequency and pattern of intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats by pharmacokinetic modeling. Drug Metab Dispos 30:254–261
Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (1999) Regulation of intravenously self–administered nicotine in rats. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 7:198–207
Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (2001a) Regulation of drug intake. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:131–143
Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (2001b) Regulation of drug intake: reply to Killeen and Reilly (2001), Madden (2001), Norman and Tsibulsky (2001), Woods (2001), and Young (2001). Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:160–162
Lynch WJ, LaBounty LP, Carroll ME (1998) A novel paradigm to investigate regulation of drug intake in rats self-administering cocaine or heroin intravenously. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 6:22–31
Madden GJ (2001) Drug-intake regulation and the interplay between economic costs and benefits: comment on Lynch and Carroll (2001). Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:148–150
Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31–39
Michelsen LG, Hug CC Jr (1996) The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil. J Clin Anesth 8:679–682
Moreton JE. Roehrs T, Khazan N (1976) Drug self-administration and sleep-awake activity in rats dependent on morphine, methadone, or l-alpha-acetylmethadol. Psychopharmacology 47:237–241
Mutschler NH, Covington HE, Miczek KA (2001) Repeated self–administered cocaine "binges" in rats: effects on cocaine intake and withdrawal. Psychopharmacology 154:292–300
National Research Council (1996) Guide for care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington
Nicola SM, Deadwyler SA (2000) Firing rate of nucleus accumbens neurons is dopamine-dependent and reflects the timing of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. J Neurosci 20:5526–5537
Norman AB, Tsibulsky VL (2001) Satiety threshold regulates maintained self-administration: comment on Lynch and Carroll (2001). Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:151–154
Pan HT, Menacherry S, Justice JB Jr (1991) Differences in the pharmacokinetics of cocaine in naive and cocaine-experienced rats. J Neurochem 56:1299–1306
Panlilio LV, Schindler CW (2000) Self-administration of remifentanil, an ultra-short acting opioid, under continuous and progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement in rats. Psychopharmacology 150:61–66
Panlilio, LV, Weiss SJ, Schindler CW (1996) Cocaine self-administration increased by compounding discriminative stimuli. Psychopharmacology 125:202–208
Panlilio LV, Weiss SJ, Schindler CW (2000) Effects of compounding drug-related stimuli: escalation of heroin self-administration. J Exp Anal Behav 73:211–224
Pickens R, Thompson R (1968) Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 161:122–129
Pickens R, Bloom WC, Thompson T (1969) Effects of reinforcement magnitude and session length on response rate of monkeys. APA Proceedings, 77th Annual Convention, pp 809–810
Pickens R, Muchow D, DeNoble V (1981) Methohexital-reinforced responding in rats: effects of fixed ratio size and injection dose. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 216:205–209
Ranaldi R, Pocock D, Zereik R, Wise RA (1999) Dopamine fluctuations in the nucleus accumbens during maintenance, extinction, and reinstatement of intravenous d-amphetamine self-administration. J Neurosci 19:4102–4109
Ranaldi R, Bauco P, McCormick S, Cools AR, Wise RA (2001). Equal sensitivity to cocaine reward in addiction-prone and addiction-resistant rat genotypes. Behav Pharmacol 12:527–534
Singer JD (1998) Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Ed Behav Stat 24:323–355
Spealman RD (1979) Behavior maintained by termination of a schedule of self-administered cocaine. Science 204:1231–1233
Spealman RD, Kelleher RT (1979) Behavioral effects of self-administered cocaine: responding maintained alternately by cocaine and electric shock in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 210:206–214
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 17:354–381
Tornatzky W, Miczek KA (2000) Cocaine self-administration "binges": transition from behavioral and autonomic regulation toward homeostatic dysregulation in rats. Psychopharmacology 148:289–298
Tsibulsky VL, Norman AB (1999) Satiety threshold: A quantitative model of maintained cocaine self-administration. Brain Res 839:85–93
Weeks JR, Collins RJ (1979) Dose and physical dependence as factors in the self-administration of morphine by rats. Psychopharmacology 655:171–177
Wise RA, Yokel RA, Hansson PA, Gerber GJ (1977) Concurrent intracranial self-stimulation and amphetamine self-administration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 7:459–466
Wise RA, Leone P, Rivest R, Leeb K (1995a) Elevations of nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC levels during intravenous heroin self-administration. Synapse 21:140–148
Wise RA, Newton P, Leeb K, Burnette B, Pocock D, Justice JB Jr (1995b) Fluctuations in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentration during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 120:10–20
Woods JH (2001) How does regulation of drug intake come about? Comment on Lynch and Carroll (2001). Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:155–156
Yokel RA, Pickens RW (1973) Self-administration of optical isomers of amphetamine and methylamphetamine by rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 187:27–33
Yokel RA, Pickens RW (1974) Drug level of d- and l-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration. Psychopharmacologia 34:255–264
Young AM (2001) Access conditions are crucial: comment on Lynch and Carroll (2001) Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:157–159
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Eric Thorndike and Bettye Campbell for technical assistance, Linda Felch and David Epstein for assisting with statistical analysis, and Edward Cone for assisting with analysis of drug levels. Preliminary reports of this research were presented at the meetings of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence in 2000 and the Society for Neuroscience in 2001. This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH,DHHS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panlilio, L.V., Katz, J.L., Pickens, R.W. et al. Variability of drug self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 167, 9–19 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-002-1366-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-002-1366-x