Summary
Residual-based a posteriori error estimates are derived within a unified setting for lowest-order conforming, nonconforming, and mixed finite element schemes. The various residuals are identified for all techniques and problems as the operator norm ||ℓ|| of a linear functional of the form
in the variable υ of a Sobolev space V. The main assumption is that the first-order finite element space is included in the kernel Ker ℓ of ℓ. As a consequence, any residual estimator that is a computable bound of ||ℓ|| can be used within the proposed frame without further analysis for nonconforming or mixed FE schemes. Applications are given for the Laplace, Stokes, and Navier-Lamè equations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, M., Oden, J.T.: A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis. Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York, 2000
Alonso, A.: Error estimators for a mixed method. Numer. Math. 74(4), 385–395 (1996)
Arnold, D.N., Falk, R.S.: A uniformly accurate finite element method for the Reissner-Mindlin plate model. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26, 1276–1290 (1989)
Arnold, D.N., Brezzi, F., Douglas, J.: PEERS: A new finite element for plane elasticity. Japan J. Appl. Math 1(2), 347–367 (1984)
Babuška, I., Miller, A.: A feedback finite element method with a posteriori error estimation: Part I, The finite element method and some properties of the a posteriori estimator. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 61(1), 1–40 (1987)
Babuška, I., Rheinboldt, W.C.: A posteriori error analysis of finite element solutions for one–dimensional problems SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18, 565–589 (1981)
Babuška, I., Strouboulis, T.: The Finite Element Method and its Reliability. The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, xii+802, 2001
Bartels, S., Carstensen, C.: Each averaging technique yields reliable a posteriori error control in FEM on unstructured grids. II. Higher order FEM. Math. Comp. 71(239), 971–994 (2002)
Becker, R., Rannacher, R.: A feed-back approach to error control in finite element methods: basic analysis and examples. East-West J. Numer. Math 4, 237–264 (1996)
Becker, R., Rannacher, R.: An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods. Acta Numerica Cambridge University Press, 2001, 1–102
Braess, D.: Finite Elements. Cambridge University Press, 1997
Braess, D., Carstensen, C.,Reddy, B.D.: Uniform Convergence and a posteriori error estimators for the enhanced strain finite element method. Numer. Math. 96, 461–479 (2004)
Brenner, S.C., Scott, L.R.: The mathematical theory of finite element methods. Springer Verlag, New York, Texts in Applied Mathematics 15, 1994
Brezzi, F., Fortin, M.: Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991
Carstensen, C.: A posteriori error estimate for the mixed finite element method. Math. Comp. 66, 465–476 (1997)
Carstensen, C., Bartels, S., Dolzmann, G.: A posteriori error estimates for nonconforming finite element methods. Numer. Math. 92(2), 233–256 (2002)
Carstensen, C., Bartels, S., Klose, R.: An experimental survey of a posteriori Courant finite element error control for the Poisson equation. Adv. Comput. Math. 15(1–4), 79–106 (2002)
Carstensen, C., Dolzmann, G.: A posteriori error estimates for mixed FEM in elasticity. Numer. Math. 81(2) 187–209 (1998)
Carstensen, C., Dolzmann, G., Funken, S.A., Helm, D.S.: Locking-free adaptive mixed finite element methods in linear elasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190(13–14), 1701–1718 (2000)
Carstensen, C., Funken, S.A.: A posteriori error control in low-order finite element discretisations of incompressible stationary flow problems. Math. Comp. 70(236), 1353–1381 (2001)
Carstensen C., Funken S.A.: Averaging technique for FE-a posteriori error control in elasticity. Part I: Conforming FEM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190, 2483–2498 (2001). Part II: λ-independent estimates. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190, 4663–4675 (2001). Part III: Locking-free conforming FEM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 191(8–10) 861–877 (2001)
Carstensen, C., Verfürth, R.: Edge residuals dominate a posteriori error estimates for low order finite element methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 36(5), 1571–1587 (1999)
Dari, E., Duran, R., Padra, C., Vampa, V.: A posteriori error estimators for nonconforming finite element methods. RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 30(4), 385–400 (1996)
Dari, E., Durdfn, R., Padra, C.: Error estimators for nonconforming finite element approximations of the Stokes problem. Math. Comp. 64(211), 1017–1033 (1995)
Eriksson, K., Johnson, C.: Adaptive finite element methods for parabolic problems I. A linear model problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 43–77 (1991)
Hoppe, R.H.W., Wohlmuth, B.: Element-orientated and edge-orientated local error estimates for nonconforming finite element methods. Math. Modeling Numer. Anal. 30, 237–263 (1996)
Kouhia, R. and Stenberg, R.: A linear nonconforming finite element method for nearly incompressible elasticity and Stokes flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 124(3), 195–212 (1995)
Stenberg, R.: A family of mixed finite elements for the elasticity problem. Numer. Math. 53(5) 513–538 (1988)
Verfürth, R.: A posteriori error estimators for the Stokes equations. Numer. Math. 55(3), 309–325 (1989)
Verfürth, R.: A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques, Wiley-Teubner (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the DFG Research Center Matheon “Mathematics for key technologies” in Berlin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carstensen, C. A unifying theory of a posteriori finite element error control. Numer. Math. 100, 617–637 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-004-0577-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-004-0577-y