Skip to main content
Log in

Industry concentration in common value auctions: theory and evidence

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine theoretically and experimentally two countervailing effects of industry concentration in common value auctions. Greater concentration of information among fewer bidders reduces competition but increases the precision of private estimates. We demonstrate that this generally leads to more aggressive bidding. However, the reduction in competition dominates the informational effects, resulting in lower prices. We examine these hypothesized effects experimentally by conducting a series of auctions with constant informational content but distributed among a varying number of bidders. The experimental results are consistent with our theoretical predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold B.C., Balakrishnan N., Nagaraja H.N. (1992) A First Course in Order Statistics. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery C., Kagel J.H. (1997) Second-price auctions with asymmetric payoffs: An experimental investigation. Econ Manage Strat 6(3): 573–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli M., Bergstrom T. (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econ Theory 26(2): 445–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani S., Riley J. (1991) Equilibria in open common value auctions. J Econ Theory 53(1): 101–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S., Lopomo G., Robinson D.T., Viswanathan S.: Efficient mechanisms for mergers and acquisitions. Int Econ Rev (in press) (2006)

  • Bulow J., Klemperer P. (2002) Prices and the winner’s curse. RAND J Econ 33(1): 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBrock L., Smith J. (1983) Joint bidding, information pooling, and the performance of petroleum lease auctions. Bell J Econ 14(2): 395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froeb L., Shor M. Auction models. In: Harkider J.D., (eds) Econometrics: Legal, Practical, and Technical Issues, pp. 225–246. American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law (2005)

  • Goeree J.K., Offerman T. (2002) Efficiency in auctions with private and common values: An experimental study. Am Econo Rev 93(3): 625–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gort M. (1969) An economic disturbance theory of mergers. Q J Econ 83(4): 624–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford J. (2005) What drives merger waves?. J Financ Econ 77(3): 529–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks K., Pinkse J., Porter R.H. (2003) Empirical implications of equilibrium bidding in first price common value auctions. Rev Econ Stud 70(1): 115–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks K., Porter R.H. (1992) Joint bidding in federal ocs auctions. Am Econ Rev 82(2): 506–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt C.A., Sherman R.: Risk aversion and the winner’s curse. Working Paper, University of Virginia (2000)

  • Hong H., Shum M. (2002) Increasing competition and the winner’s curse: Evidence from procurement. Rev Econ Stud 69(4): 871–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M.O.: The non-existence of equilibrium in Vickrey, second-price, and english auctions. Working Paper, California Institute of Technology (2005)

  • Jovanovic B., Rousseau P.L. (2002) The q-theory of mergers. Am. Econ. Rev. 92(2): 198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagel J.H., Levin D. (1986) The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. Am Econ Rev 76(5): 894–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna V., Morgan J.: (anti-) competitive effects of joint bidding and bidder restrictions. Working Paper, Penn State University and Princeton University (1997)

  • Mailath G.J., Zemsky P. (1991) Collusion in second price auctions with heterogeneous bidders. Games Econ Behav 3(4): 467–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares V.: Essays in Joint Bidding. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University (2001)

  • Mares V.: Monotonicity and selection in second price auctions. Working Paper, Washington University, St. Louis (2005)

  • Matthews S.A. (1984) Information acquisition in discriminatory auctions. In: Boyer M., Kihlstrom R.E. (eds) Bayesian Models in Economic Theory. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 181–207

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R.P., McMillan J. (1992) Bidding rings. Am Econ Rev 82(3): 579–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P. (1981) Rational expectations, information acquisition, and competitive bidding. Econometrica 49(4): 921–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., Weber R. (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5): 1089–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin C.H., Reiley D.H. (2006) Recombinant estimation for normal-form games, with applications to auctions and bargaining. Games Econ Behav 54(1): 159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkse J., Tan G. (2005) The affiliation effect in first-price auctions. Econometrica 73(1): 263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked M., Shanthikumar J.G. (1994) Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. New York, Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschantz S., Crooke P., Froeb L. (2000) Mergers in sealed vs. oral auctions. Int J Econ Bus 7(2): 201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waehrer K., Perry M.K. (2003) Mergers in auction markets. RAND J Econ 34(2): 287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitt W. (1985) Uniform conditional variability ordering of probability distributions. J Appl Prob 22(3): 619–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhael Shor.

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Octavian Carare, Eric Friedman, Luke Froeb, Ron Harstad, Toshi Iizuka, Mike Rothkopf, Charles Thomas, and two anonymous referees, for many useful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mares, V., Shor, M. Industry concentration in common value auctions: theory and evidence. Economic Theory 35, 37–56 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0223-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0223-x

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation