Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Periarticular osteoporosis of the forearm correlated with joint destruction and functional impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The relationship between periarticular osteoporosis in the distal forearm and joint destruction or functional impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not sufficiently elucidated. From a single institutional cohort study, we found a strong correlation between periarticular forearm bone mineral density (BMD) and joint destruction or functional impairment.

Introduction

This study was conducted to investigate (1) the difference between various periarticular regions of interest (ROIs) of BMD of the forearm, (2) the correlation between periarticular forearm BMD and joint destruction and physical function, (3) the independent variables for predicting BMD of the forearm, and (4) the forearm BMD of different ROIs in the early stage of RA.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study in an RA cohort. Measurements included BMD of the distal forearm, joint destruction of the hands assessed by modified total Sharp score (mTSS), functional impairment assessed by a health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and other clinical data. Variables affecting the forearm BMD values were analyzed by correlation and stepwise regression analyses.

Results

Of the 405 patients enrolled in the present study, 370 (average age; 62.9 years) were identified as having definite RA with a complete set of data. BMD in the distal end of the forearm (BMDud) was significantly reduced compared with that in the distal third of the forearm (BMD1/3). In a stepwise regression analysis, the mTSS in BMD1/3 was an independent predicting variable, while age and partial HAQ scores associated with the upper extremity were common independent variables in BMDud and BMD1/3. BMDud was significantly less than BMD1/3, even in patients with a short duration of the disease. BMD1/3 was significantly less in non-remission group compared with that in remission group in patients with a short duration of the disease.

Conclusion

Periarticular BMD in the distal forearm is closely correlated with joint destruction and functional impairment in RA. Periarticular BMD in the distal forearm may be already reduced at the clinical manifestation of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aletaha D, Strand V, Smolen JS, Ward MM (2008) Treatment-related improvement in physical function varies with duration of rheumatoid arthritis: a pooled analysis of clinical trial results. Ann Rheum Dis 67:238–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schett G, Hayer S, Zwerina J, Redlich K, Smolen JS (2005) Mechanisms of disease: the link between RANKL and arthritic bone disease. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 1:47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Geusens P, Lems WF (2011) Osteoimmunology and osteoporosis. Arthritis Res Ther 13:242

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brower AC (1990) Use of the radiograph to measure the course of rheumatoid arthritis. The gold standard versus fool’s gold. Arthritis Rheum 33:316–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naumann L, Hermann KG, Huscher D, Lenz K, Burmester GR, Backhaus M, Buttgereit F (2012) Quantification of periarticular demineralization and synovialitis of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Osteoporos Int 23:2671–2679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alves C, Colin EM, van Oort WJ, Sluimer JP, Hazes JM, Luime JJ (2011) Periarticular osteoporosis: a useful feature in the diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis? Reliability and validity in a cross-sectional diagnostic study using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50:2257–2263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bejarano V, Hensor E, Green M, Haugeberg G, Brown AK, Buch MH, Emery P, Conaghan PG (2012) Relationship between early bone mineral density changes and long-term function and radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64:66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deodhar A, Dore RK, Mandel D, Schechtman J, Shergy W, Trapp R, Ory PA, Peterfy CG, Fuerst T, Wang H, Zhou L, Tsuji W, Newmark R (2010) Denosumab-mediated increase in hand bone mineral density associated with decreased progression of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res 62:569–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deodhar AA, Brabyn J, Pande I, Scott DL, Woolf AD (2003) Hand bone densitometry in rheumatoid arthritis, a five year longitudinal study: an outcome measure and a prognostic marker. Ann Rheum Dis 62:767–770

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Furu M, Hashimoto M, Ito H, Fujii T, Terao C, Yamakawa N, Yoshitomi H, Ogino H, Ishikawa M, Mimori T (2014) Discordance and accordance between patient’s and physician’s assessments in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 43:291–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Terao C, Hashimoto M, Furu M, Nakabo S, Ohmura K, Nakashima R, Imura Y, Yukawa N, Yoshifuji H, Matsuda F, Ito H, Fujii T, Mimori T (2014) Inverse association between air pressure and rheumatoid arthritis synovitis. PLoS One 9, e85376

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashimoto M, Fujii T, Hamaguchi M, Furu M, Ito H, Terao C, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto W, Matsuo T, Mori M, Ohmura K, Kawabata H, Mimori T (2014) Increase of hemoglobin levels by anti-IL-6 receptor antibody (tocilizumab) in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 9, e98202

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pincus T, Swearingen C, Wolfe F (1999) Toward a multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum 42:2220–2230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Heijde DM (1996) Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 10:435–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Heijde DM (2000) How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol 27:261–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 18:481–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsukura T, Kagamimori S, Yamagami T, Nishino H, Iki M, Kajita E, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H, Matsuzaki T, Marumo F (2000) Reference data of forearm bone mineral density in healthy Japanese male and female subjects in the second decade based on calendar age and puberty onset: Japanese Population Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) study. Osteoporos Int 11:858–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamura K, Tanaka Y, Saitou K, Nashimoto M, Yamamoto M (2000) Age and sex differences in the bone mineral density of the distal forearm based on health check-up data of 6343 Japanese. Osteoporos Int 11:772–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelly TL, Crane G, Baran DT (1994) Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data. Calcif Tissue Int 54:212–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamada C, Fujimoto S, Ikeda K, Nomura Y, Matsubara A, Kanno M, Shide K, Tanaka K, Imai E, Fukuwatari T, Shibata K, Inagaki N (2011) Relationship of homocysteine and homocysteine-related vitamins to bone mineral density in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig 5:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Disini L, Foster M, Milligan PJ, Buckland-Wright JC (2004) Cancellous bone changes in the radius of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional quantitative macroradiographic study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:1150–1157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alenfeld FE, Diessel E, Brezger M, Sieper J, Felsenberg D, Braun J (2000) Detailed analyses of periarticular osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int 11:400–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Engdahl C, Lindholm C, Stubelius A, Ohlsson C, Carlsten H, Lagerquist MK (2013) Periarticular bone loss in antigen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 65:2857–2865

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haugeberg G, Strand A, Kvien TK, Kirwan JR (2005) Reduced loss of hand bone density with prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 165:1293–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haugeberg G, Morton S, Emery P, Conaghan PG (2011) Effect of intra-articular corticosteroid injections and inflammation on periarticular and generalised bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:184–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sugiguchi S, Goto H, Inaba M, Nishizawa T (2010) Preferential reduction of bone mineral density at the femur reflects impairment of physical activity in patients with low-activity rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 20:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schlenker RA, VonSeggen WW (1976) The distribution of cortical and trabecular bone mass along the lengths of the radius and ulna and the implications for in vivo bone mass measurements. Calcif Tissue Res 20:41–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Riis BJ, Christiansen C (1988) Measurement of spinal or peripheral bone mass to estimate early postmenopausal bone loss? Am J Med 84:646–653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalkwarf HJ, Laor T, Bean JA (2011) Fracture risk in children with a forearm injury is associated with volumetric bone density and cortical area (by peripheral QCT) and areal bone density (by DXA). Osteoporos Int 22:607–616

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zebaze RM, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Bohte A, Iuliano-Burns S, Mirams M, Price RI, Mackie EJ, Seeman E (2010) Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 375:1729–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu TY, Griffith JF, Qin L, Hung VW, Fong TN, Au SK, Tang XL, Kwok AW, Leung PC, Li EK, Tam LS (2013) Structure and strength of the distal radius in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a case–control study. J Bone Miner Res 28:794–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kocijan R, Finzel S, Englbrecht M, Engelke K, Rech J, Schett G (2014) Decreased quantity and quality of the periarticular and nonperiarticular bone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res 29:1005–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoff M, Haugeberg G, Odegård S, Syversen S, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK (2009) Cortical hand bone loss after 1 year in early rheumatoid arthritis predicts radiographic hand joint damage at 5-year and 10-year follow-up. Ann Rheum Dis 68:324–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boer KV, Heimans L, Visser K, Kälvesten J, Goekoop RJ, van Oosterhout M, Harbers JB, Bijkerk C, Steup-Beekman M, de Buck MP, de Sonnaville PB, Huizinga TW, Allaart CF (2015) Four-month metacarpal bone mineral density loss predicts radiological joint damage progression after 1 year in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: exploratory analyses from the IMPROVED study. Ann Rheum Dis 74:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schett G, Gravallese E (2012) Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8:656–664

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Rooy DP, Kälvesten J, Huizinga TW, van der Helm-van Mil AH (2012) Loss of metacarpal bone density predicts RA development in recent-onset arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51:1037–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pye SR, Adams JE, Ward KA, Bunn DK, Symmons DP, O’Neill TW (2010) Disease activity and severity in early inflammatory arthritis predict hand cortical bone loss. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:1943–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bosello S, Fedele AL, Peluso G, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G (2011) Very early rheumatoid arthritis is the major predictor of major outcomes: clinical ACR remission and radiographic non-progression. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1292–1295

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Filer A, de Pablo P, Allen G, Nightingale P, Jordan A, Jobanputra P, Bowman S, Buckley CD, Raza K (2011) Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:500–507

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, McLean L (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals s high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset. Ann Rheum Dis 57:350–356

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Duthie JJ, Gardner DL, Richmond J, Roy JM (1956) Nature of anaemia in rheumatoid arthritis. III. Changes in the bone marrow and their relation to other features of the disease. Ann Rheum Dis 15:217–226

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kleyer A, Finzel S, Rech J, Manger B, Krieter M, Faustini F, Araujo E, Hueber AJ, Harre U, Engelke K, Schett G (2014) Bone loss before the clinical onset of rheumatoid arthritis in subjects with anticitrullinated protein antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 73:854–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rantapää-Dahlqvist S, de Jong BA, Berglin E, Hallmans G, Wadell G, Stenlund H, Sundin U, van Venrooij WJ (2003) Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:2741–2749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Haugeberg G, Conaghan PG, Quinn M, Emery P (2009) Bone loss in patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis: infliximab and methotrexate compared with methotrexate treatment alone. Explorative analysis from a 12-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1898–1901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Güler-Yüksel M, Allaart CF, Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, van Groenendael JH, Mallée C, de Bois MH, Breedveld FC, Dijkmans BA, Lems WF (2009) Changes in hand and generalised bone mineral density in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

H.I. has received research grant and/or speaker fee from Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Bristol-Myers, Abbvie, and Astellas; M.F., M.H., M.I., and T.F. belongs to the department that is financially supported by four pharmaceutical companies (Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, and Eisai). M.F. and M.I. have received grant and research support from Astellas and Pfizer Japan; M.F. has received grant and research support from Astellas; T.F. has received grant and research support from Bristol-Myers and Pfizer Japan.; T.I., N.Y., C.T., M.A., Y.H., T.M., H.A., and S.M. declared no conflict of interest exists. The sponsors were not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data; in the writing of this manuscript; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Ito.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Example of a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the radius/ulna that was used to determine periarticular forearm bone mineral density. The automated evaluation software places various regions of interest in the ultradistal, mid-distal, one-third distal and total bone regions. BMD, bone mineral density; BMDud, BMD in the ultradistal region; BMDmid, BMD in the mid-distal region; BMD1/3, BMD in the one-third distal region (TIFF 1521 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Correlations between various ROIs of forearm BMD (TIFF 1521 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Univariate analysis of forearm BMD with related factors (n = 324) (TIFF 1521 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iwata, T., Ito, H., Furu, M. et al. Periarticular osteoporosis of the forearm correlated with joint destruction and functional impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int 27, 691–701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3256-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3256-1

Keywords

Navigation