Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adherence to treatment of primary osteoporosis and its association to fractures—the Swedish Adherence Register Analysis (SARA)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Osteoporosis treatments reduce the risk of fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate adherence to treatment of osteoporosis and its association to fractures in Sweden. Adherence to treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden is poor, and time on treatment was found to be significantly associated with fracture incidence.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to estimate persistence and compliance to treatment of primary osteoporosis in Sweden. A second aim was to investigate the determinants of non-persistence and the association between adherence and fracture incidence.

Methods

Patients were identified through filled prescriptions for alendronate, risedronate, strontium ranelate, and raloxifene between 2005 and 2009 from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Persistence was investigated using survival analysis. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to measure compliance in persistent patients. The outcome measure in the analysis of adherence and fracture incidence was hospitalized osteoporotic fractures.

Results

The final cohort consisted of 56,586 treatment-naïve patients (mean age 71, 86% women). A total of 51%, 35%, 25%, and 14% were still on treatment (switching allowed) after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Average MPR in persistent patients was 94.2% (CI95 94.2–94.3%). Compared with <1 month of therapy, treatment for 1 month to 1 year, 1 to 2 years, and 2 to 3 years was associated with a lower 3-year fracture incidence (HR 0.86, p = 0.091; HR 0.67, p < 0.001; and HR 0.59, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant relationship was identified between MPR and fracture risk.

Conclusions

Persistence to treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden is poor and approximately 50% of all treatment-naïve patients discontinue therapy within 1 year. Average refill compliance, estimated only while the patients were persistent, was found to be close to perfect. A strong association was identified between treatment persistence and fracture incidence, which calls for action to improve the current situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reginster JY, Burlet N (2006) Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone 38:S4–S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. EFFO, NOF (1997) Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 82:1493–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM (2007) A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 18:1023–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Hammond CS, Moncur MM, Ray GT, Hebert GM, Pressman AR, Ettinger B (2003) Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med 115:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamberg L (2000) Patient-physician relationship critical even during brief “medication checks”. Jama 284:29–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eraker SA, Kirscht JP, Becker MH (1984) Understanding and improving patient compliance. Ann Intern Med 100:258–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cramer JA (1995) Relationship between medication compliance and medical outcomes. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 52:S27–S29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C (2001) A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 23:1296–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Cooper C (2006) Factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey. Osteoporos Int 17:1638–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. SCB, Statistics Sweden. Available from: http://www.scb.se

  12. The Swedish Medical Products Agency (2007) Behandling av osteoporos. Information från Läkemedelsverket 18:19–38

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ettinger B, Chidambaran P, Pressman A (2001) Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis drug prescription among patients with high exposure to glucocorticoid drugs. Am J Manag Care 7:597–605

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. The National Board of Health and Welfare. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se

  15. Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, Fairchild CJ, Fuldeore MJ, Ollendorf DA, Wong PK (2008) Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health 11:44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (1999) Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. Wiley, New York, p 386

    Google Scholar 

  18. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, Barr CE, Arvesen JN, Abbott TA, Silverman S (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, Altman R (2005) Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:1453–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brankin E, Walker M, Lynch N, Aspray T, Lis Y, Cowell W (2006) The impact of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonates among postmenopausal women in the UK: evidence from three databases. Curr Med Res Opin 22:1249–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cramer JA, Lynch NO, Gaudin AF, Walker M, Cowell W (2006) The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Clin Ther 28:1686–1694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ideguchi H, Ohno S, Takase K, Ueda A, Ishigatsubo Y (2008) Outcomes after switching from one bisphosphonate to another in 146 patients at a single university hospital. Osteoporos Int 19:1777–1783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Musliner T, Hochberg MC, Nevitt MC, Suryawanshi S, Cummings SR (2000) Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the fracture intervention trial. FIT Research Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4118–4124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. Jama 280:2077–2082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, Hooper M, Roux C, Brandi ML, Lund B, Ethgen D, Pack S, Roumagnac I, Eastell R (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative doses. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:1383–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McCloskey E, de Takats D, Orgee J (2005) Characteristics associated with non-persistence during daily therapy. Experience from the placebo wing of a community based clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 20(suppl 1):S282

    Google Scholar 

  30. Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, Satterfield S, Wallace RB, Bauer DC, Palermo L, Wehren LE, Lombardi A, Santora AC, Cummings SR (2006) Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the fracture intervention trial long-term extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. Jama 296:2927–2938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Strewler GJ (2004) Decimal point–osteoporosis therapy at the 10-year mark. N Engl J Med 350:1172–1174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JP, Tucci JR, Emkey RD, Tonino RP, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Downs RW, Gupta J, Santora AC, Liberman UA (2004) Ten years’ experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 350:1189–1199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Iizuka T, Matsukawa M (2008) Potential excessive suppression of bone turnover with long-term oral bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Climacteric 11:287–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, Pak CY (2005) Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1294–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. De Geest S, Sabate E (2003) Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2:323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

This study was sponsored by Amgen. EL, OS, and FB have previously received funding from several pharmaceutical companies involved in marketing products for treatment of osteoporosis. SR is an employee of Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. i3 Innovus, Stockholm, Sweden

    E. Landfeldt, O. Ström & F. Borgström

  2. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (Medical Management Centre), Stockholm, Sweden

    O. Ström & F. Borgström

  3. Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland

    S. Robbins

  4. Klarabergsviadukten 90, hus D, 2 tr, 111 64, Stockholm, Sweden

    O. Ström

Authors
  1. E. Landfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Ström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Robbins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Borgström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Ström.

Additional information

Erik Landfeldt and Oskar Ström made equal contributions to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landfeldt, E., Ström, O., Robbins, S. et al. Adherence to treatment of primary osteoporosis and its association to fractures—the Swedish Adherence Register Analysis (SARA). Osteoporos Int 23, 433–443 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1549-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1549-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation