Abstract
In order to evaluate the usefulness of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the assessment of male osteoporosis, a cross-sectional, population-based study was performed. A cohort of 4,832 men, randomly selected, community-dwelling, aged 60–80 years and representative of the general older male Italian population was recruited. QUS measurements were assessed in 83 centers distributed all over Italy and equipped with an Achilles device (GE-Lunar, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). All participants were administered a questionnaire covering lifestyle variables and medical history. Low-energy fractures that had occurred since age 50 were recorded. Overall, 43 subjects reported a previous hip fracture and 455 subjects reported other non-spinal fractures. Univariate analysis showed that fractured subjects were older, with a lower level of outdoor physical activity and a more frequent history of prolonged bedridden periods in comparison with unfractured subjects. Men reporting non-spinal fractures showed a higher prevalence of smoking, while no difference was found among groups in anthropometric measures and calcium intake. QUS measurements showed that all QUS parameters were significantly lower in both fracture groups ( p <0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that each SD reduction in QUS measures was associated with an approximate doubling of the risk for hip fracture, independent of age and other clinical variables (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA]: odds ratio [OR]=2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61–3.08; stiffness index: OR=2.19; CI 1.56–3.11; speed of sound [SOS]: OR=1.71; CI 1.18–3.24) and with an increase of the risk of other non-spinal fractures (BUA: 1.38; CI 1.22–1.59; stiffness index: OR=1.27; CI 1.17–1.38; SOS: OR=1.14; CI 0.96–1.40). It can be concluded that calcaneal QUS measurement is associated with the risk for hip fracture and any non-spinal fractures among a community-dwelling cohort of elderly men. The strength of the association between QUS measurement and fracture is similar to that observed in elderly women.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Melton LJ 3rd (1993) Hip fractures: A worldwide problem today and tomorrow. Bone 14:S1–S8
Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Gilbert C, Eisman JA (1994) Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES). Osteoporos Int 4:277–282
Seeman E (2001) Unresolved issues in osteoporosis in men. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2:45–64
Melton LJ 3rd, Thamer M, Ray NF et al (1997) Fracture attributable to osteoporosis: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12:16–23
Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fracture in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289
Nyquist F, Gardsell P, Sernbo I, Jeppsson JO, Johnell O (1998) Assessment of sex hormones and bone mineral density in relation to occurrence of fracture in men: a prospective population-based study. Bone 22:147–151
De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 10:1587–1593
Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM et al (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS study. Lancet 348:511–514
Bauer DC, Glüer CC, Cauley JA et al (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. Arch Intern Med 157:629–634
Pluskiewicz W, Drozdzowska B (1999) Ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus in men: differences between healthy and fractured persons and the influence of age and anthropometric features on ultrasound parameters. Osteoporos Int 10:47–51
Mulleman D, Legroux-Gerot I, Duquesnoy B, Marchandise X, Delcambre B, Cortet B (2002) Quantitative ultrasound of bone in male osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:388–393
Pluijm SMF, Graafmans WC, Bouter LM, Lips P (1999) Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people. Osteoporos Int 9:550–556
Khaw KT, Reeve J, Luben R et al (2004) Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 363:197–202
Adami S, Giannini S, Giorgino R et al (2003) The effect of age, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study. Osteoporos Int 14:198–207
Prudham D, Evans JG (1981) Factors associated with falls in the elderly: a community study. Age Ageing 10:141–146
Karlsson MK, Duan Y, Ahlborg H, Obrant KJ, Johnell O, Seeman E (2001) Age, gender, and fragility fractures are associated with differences in quantitative ultrasound independent of bone mineral density. Bone 28:118–122
Turner CH, Peacock M, Timmerman L, Neal JM, Johnston CC (1995) Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass. Osteoporos Int 5:130–135
Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1995) Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 10:243–249
Orwoll E (2000) Perspective: Assessing bone density in men. J Bone Miner Res 15:1867–1870
Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2001) Ten-year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:989–995
Aaron J, Makins N, Sagreiya K (1987) The microanatomy of trabecular bone loss in normal aging men and women. Clin Orthop 215:260–271
Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS (1983) Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis: Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 72:1396–1409
Nicholson PH, Muller R, Lowet G et al (1998) Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? Bone 23:425–431
Acknowledgements
This work was totally funded by an unlimited grant from Procter and Gamble, Rome, Italy
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Local coordinators of the ESOPO study
Appendix: Local coordinators of the ESOPO study
Antonino Accardi, Marsala (TP); Alberto Angeli, Orbassano (TO); Salvatore Baglio, Roma; Alfonso Baldoncini, Arezzo; Pierluigi Ballardini, Lagosanto (FE); Cataldo Bancheri, Roma; Franco Beghe, Imperia; Luigi Bernini, S. Miniato (PI); Maurizio Bevilacqua, Milano; Gerolamo Bianchi, Arenzano (GE); Giuseppe Bonomi, Palmanova (UD); Massimo Bottai, Sarzana (SP); Giovanni Brogi, Pescia (PT); Giuseppe Candioto, Agrigento; Sergio Candiotto, Dolo (VE); Riccardo Cecchetti, Pontedera (PI), Raffaele Cerqua, S. Felice a Cancello (CE); Sandro Cervelli, Roma; Stefano Coaccioli, Terni; Franco Coin, Dolo (VE); Cataldo Colella, Aversa (CE); Daniele Costi, Parma; Massimo Cravero, Torino; Salvatore D’Auria, Benevento; Giovanni D’Avola, Catania; Nicola De Gennaro, Capua (CE); Lucio Del Forno, Vasto (CH); Arturo D’Elia, Napoli; Ombretta Di Munno, Pisa; Roberto Di Virgilio, Treviso; Filippo Favazzi, Mistretta (ME); Mario Ferraris, Vercelli; Paolo Filipponi, Umbertide (PG); Cristiano Maria Francucci, Ancona; Bruno Frediani, Siena; Giorgio Gandolini, Milano; Romildo Gasparini, Legnago (VR); Romeo Gatti, Viterbo; Salvatore Gatto, Napoli; Ernesto Gemini, Napoli; Tommaso Gismondi, Bari; Stefano Gonnelli, Siena; Siro Grassi, Napoli; Giovanni Iolascon, Napoli; Giancarlo Isaia, Torino; Tommaso Izzo, Nocera Inferiore (SA); Giovanni La Montagna, Napoli; Renato La Forgia, Matera; Giovanni Lapadula, Bari; Gaetano Loiacono, Martina Franca (TA); Pierluigi Lombardi, Castelnuovo (LU); Roberto Lovato, Vicenza; Riccardo Maglitto, Lentini (SR); Fabio Magnani, Vignola (MO); Nazzarena Malavolta, Bologna; Giorgio Mancini, Macerata; Giuseppe Masellis, Carpi (MO); Domenico Maugeri, Catania; Carmelo Micale, Cuggiono (MI); Redento Mora, Pavia; Maurizio Muratore, S. Cesario di Lecce (LE); Rita Occhipinti, Belluno; Geremia Oliva, Frattamaggiore, (NA); Ernesto Palummeri, Genova; Domenica Panzavecchia, Partinico (PA); Salvatore Parello, Canelli (AT); Raffaele Pellerito, Torino; Giovanni Pisanu, Oristano (CA); Domenico Policicchio, Avellino; Marco Pozone, L’Aquila; Giulio Pucci, Spoleto (PG); Stefano Respizzi, Rozzano (MI); Giuseppe Roberti, Chivasso (TO); Maurizio Rossini, Verona; Sergio Rossitto, Piazza Armerina (EN); Luciano Sabadini, Arezzo; Carlo Salvarani, Reggio Emilia; Salvatore Salvini, Anzio (RM); Giuseppe Santeufemia, Iglesias (CA); Ivana Santi, Milano; Leonardo Sartori, Padova; Mario Sfrappini, S. Benedetto del Tronto (AP); Ferdinando Silveri, Jesi (AN); Luigi Sinigaglia, Milano; Michele Soriano, Vibo Valentia; Ruggero Spinazze, Conegliano (TV); Giuseppe Stancati, Cosenza; Giancarlo Tartarelli, Massa; David Topini, Viterbo; Francesco Trotta, Ferrara; Giuseppe Varcasia, Castrovillari (CS); Alfredo Zanatta, Legnago (VR)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varenna, M., Sinigaglia, L., Adami, S. et al. Association of quantitative heel ultrasound with history of osteoporotic fractures in elderly men: The ESOPO study. Osteoporos Int 16, 1749–1754 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1914-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1914-4