Skip to main content
Log in

First-degree relatives of persons suffering from osteoporosis: beliefs, knowledge, and health-related behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the beliefs, knowledge, and health-related behaviors of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of osteoporotic women with a comparison group of women not having a FDR with osteoporosis. Research design: Telephone interviews. Participants: Participants were 172 women (48 FDRs and 124 comparisons), recruited by a systematic sampling from the list of all women aged 40+ attending an outpatient screening program at a large tertiary medical center in Israel. Methods: Information was collected regarding participants' perceived susceptibility to develop osteoporosis, perceived concerns, and perceived prevention optimism. Additionally, information was collected regarding knowledge about osteoporosis, and participation in screening and preventive behavior. Results: Participants in the FDR group reported higher perceived susceptibility and higher concerns about developing the disease than participants in the comparison group. A higher proportion of FDRs reported engaging in screening behavior, but no differences were found in preventive behaviors. Screening behavior was associated with perceived concerns and age for members of the comparison group, and with age for FDRs. Conclusions: FDRs are characterized by greater perceived vulnerability and concerns. However, they are no more likely to engage in preventive behaviors or have more knowledge about the disease. These findings stress the importance of expanding efforts to increase the knowledge and awareness of at-risk persons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA 285(6):785–795

    Google Scholar 

  2. Danielson ME, Cauley JA, Baker CE et al (1999) Familial resemblance of bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound attenuation: The BMD in Mothers and Daughters Study. J Bone Miner Res 14(1):102–110

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yeap SS, Beaumont M, Bennett A et al (1998) Genetic and environmental factors affecting bone mineral density in large families. Postgrad Med J 74(872):349–354

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deng HW, Chen WM, Recker S et al (2000) Genetic determinants of Colle's fracture and differential bone mass in women with and without Colle's fracture. J Bone Miner Res 15:1243–1252

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alagna SW, Morokoff PJ, Bevett JM, Reddy DM (1987) Performance of breast self-examination by women at high risk for breast cancer. Women Health 12:29–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bratt O, Kristoffersson U, Lundgren R, Olsson H (1997) Sons of men with prostate cancer: their attitudes regarding possible inheritance of prostrate cancer, screening and genetic testing. Urology 50:360–365

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller SM, Diefenbach MA, Kruus LK et al (2001) Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients. J Behav Med 24(3):247–258

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laughler DC, Kean TJ, Esparza D et al (1981) The breast self-examination practices of high risk women: implications for patient education. Pat Counsel Health Educ 3(3):103–107

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith GE, DeHaven MJ, Grundig JP, Wilson GR (1997) African-American males and prostate cancer: assessing knowledge levels in the community. J Nat Med Assoc 89:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  10. Constanza M, Stoddard A, Caw VP, Zopk JG (1992) The risk factors of age and family history and their relationship to screening mammography utilization. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:774–778

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C et al (1993) Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst 85(13):1074–1080

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Kaplan De-Nour A (1999) Psychological distress in health women with familial breast cancer: Like mother, like daughter? Int J Psychiatry Med 29(4):411–420

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts JS, Connell C (2000) Illness representations among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dis Rel Dis 14(3):129–136

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ailinger RL, Emerson J (1998) Women's knowledge of osteoporosis. Appl Nurs Res 11(3):111–114

    Google Scholar 

  15. Satterfield T, Johnson SM, Slovic P, Nei, N, Schein JR (2000) Perceived risks and reported behaviors associated with osteoporosis and its treatment. Women Health 31(4):21–39

    Google Scholar 

  16. Decruyenaere M, Evers-Kiebooms G, Welkenhuysen M et al (2000) Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: A theoretical perspective. Psycho-oncology. 9:528–536

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rimes KA, Salkovskis PM, Shipman AJ (1999) Psychological and behavioural effects of bone density screening for osteoporosis. Psychol Health 14:585–608

    Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell MK, Torgerson DJ, Thomas RE et al (1998) Direct disclosure of bone density results to patients: Effect on knowledge of osteoporosis risk and anxiety level. Osteoporos Int 8:584–590

    Google Scholar 

  19. Siebzehner MI (2000) Consensus statement on prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Isr Med Assoc J 2:397–401

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbar O, Borovik R (1998) How daughters of women with breast cancer cope with the threat of the illness. Behav Med 24:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  21. Audrain J, Schwartz M, Herrera J et al (2001) Physical activity in first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. J Behav Med 24(6):587–603

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hobson EE, Ralston SH (2001) Role of genetic factors in the pathophysiology and management of osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol 54: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perla Werner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner, P., Olchovsky, D., Erlich-Gelaki, H. et al. First-degree relatives of persons suffering from osteoporosis: beliefs, knowledge, and health-related behavior. Osteoporos Int 14, 306–311 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1357-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1357-0

Keywords

Navigation