Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of the geometry of protective barriers on the propagation of shock waves

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The protection of industrial facilities, classified as hazardous, against accidental or intentional explosions represents a major challenge for the prevention of personal injury and property damage, which also involves social and economic issues. We consider here the use of physical barriers against the effects of these explosions, which include the pressure wave, the projection of fragments and the thermal flash. This approach can be recommended for the control of major industrial risks, but no specific instructions are available for its implementation. The influence of a protective barrier against a detonation-type explosion is studied in small-scale experiments. The effects of overpressure are examined over the entire path of the shock wave across the barrier and in the downstream zone to be protected. Two series of barrier structures are studied. The first series (A) of experiments investigates two types of barrier geometry with dimensions based on NATO recommendations. These recommendations stipulate that the barrier should be 2 m higher than the charge height, the thickness at the crest should be more than 0.5 m, while its length should be equal to twice the protected structure length and the bank slope should be equivalent to the angle of repose of the soil. The second series (B) of experiments investigates the influence of geometrical parameters of the barrier (thickness at the crest and inclination angles of the front and rear faces) on its protective effects. This project leads to an advance in our understanding of the physical phenomena involved in the propagation of blast waves resulting from an external explosion, in the area around a protective physical barrier. The study focuses on the dimensioning of protective barriers against overpressure effects arising from detonation and shows the advantage of using a barrier with a vertical front or rear face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou, Z.Q., Hao, H.: Prediction of airblast loads on structures behind a protective barrier. Int. J. Impact Eng. 35, 363–375 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allain, L.: Barricade Influence on Blast Wave Propagation. Report, SNPE / Division Défense Espace, Vert-le-Petit, France (1994)

  3. Borgers, J.: Blast walls reviewed. In: 21st International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock, Jerusalem, Israel (2010)

  4. Guide SFEPA \({\rm n}^{\circ }\)9. Guide des Bonnes Pratiques en Pyrotechnie—Edition Syndicat des Fabricants d’Explosifs, de Pyrotechnie et d’Artifices (2009)

  5. Éveillard, S., Lardjane, N., Vinçont, J.Y., Sochet, I.: Towards a fast-running method for blast-wave mitigation by a prismatic blast wall. Compte Rendus Mecanique 341, 625–635 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sochet, I., Sauvan, P.E., Boulanger, R., Nozeres, F.: Effect of a gas charge explosion at the closed end of a gas storage system. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 27, 42–48 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trélat, S., Sochet, I., Autrusson, B., Cheval, K., Loiseau, O.: Strong explosion near a parallelepipedic structure. Shock Waves 16, 349–357 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinney, G.F., Graham, J.K.: Explosive Shocks in Air, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. TM5-1300, U.S. Department of the Army.: Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions. Army TM 5-1300, Navy NAVFAC P-397, AFR 88-22. Departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force, Washington, DC (2008)

  10. Eveillard, S.: Propagation d’une onde de choc en présence d’une barrière de protection. PhD Thesis, Orleans University, France (2013)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the BARPPRO ANR research programme (dimensioning physical protective barriers against propagation of pressure waves following an explosion). The work was carried out at the ANR and CEA, who provided financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Sochet.

Additional information

Communicated by C.-Y. Wen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sochet, I., Eveillard, S., Vinçont, J.Y. et al. Influence of the geometry of protective barriers on the propagation of shock waves. Shock Waves 27, 209–219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-016-0625-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-016-0625-4

Keywords

Navigation