Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Free-piston driver optimisation for simulation of high Mach number scramjet flow conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The University of Queensland (UQ) is currently developing high Mach number, high total pressure scramjet flow conditions in its X2 and X3 expansion tube facilities. These conditions involve shock-processing a high-density air test gas followed by its unsteady expansion into a low-pressure acceleration tube. This relatively slow shock-processing requires the driver to supply high pressure gas for a significantly greater duration than normally required for superorbital flow conditions. One technique to extend the duration is to operate a tuned free-piston driver. For X2, this involves the use of a very light piston at high speeds so that, following diaphragm rupture, the piston displacement substitutes for vented driver gas, thus maintaining driver pressure much longer. However, this presents challenges in terms of higher piston loading and also safely stopping the piston. This article discusses the tuned driver concept, the design of a very lightweight but highly stressed piston, and details the successful development of a new set of tuned free-piston driver conditions for X2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chinitz W., Erdos J.I., Rizkalla O., Anderson G.Y., Bushnell D.: Facility opportunities and associated stream chemistry considerations for hypersonic air-breathing propulsion. J. Propul. Power 10, 6–17 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. US Standard Atmosphere 1976: http://modelweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/atmos/us_standard.html (2008). Accessed 2 November 2008

  3. Gordon S., McBride B.J.: Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. Technical Report Reference Publication 1311, NASA, Cleveland (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt J.L., Martin J.G.: Rudiments and methodology for design and analysis of hypersonic air-breathing vehicles. In: Curran, E.T., Murthy, S.N.B. (eds) Scramjet propulsion, pp. 939–978. AIAA, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hornung H.G.: 28th Lanchester memorial lecture—experimental real-gas hypersonics. Aeronaut. J. 92, 379–389 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson G.Y., McClinton C.R., Weidner J.P.: Scramjet performance. In: Curran, E.T., Murthy, S.N.B. (eds) Scramjet propulsion, pp. 369–446. AIAA, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu F.K., Marren D.E.: Advanced hypersonic test facilities. AIAA, Reston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, G., Kumar, A., Erdos, J.: Progress in Hypersonic Combustion Technology with Computation and Experiment. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Second International Aerospace Planes Conference, Orlando, FL, Oct 29–31, AIAA-90-5254 (1990)

  9. Stewart B.S., Morgan R.G., Jacobs P.A.: Rocketdyne hypersonic flow laboratory as high-performance expansion tube for scramjet-testing. J. Propul. Power 19, 98–103 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bakos, R.J., Erdos, J.I.: Options for enhancement of the performance of shock-expansion tubes and tunnels. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan 9–12 (1995)

  11. Itoh K.: Characteristics of the HIEST and its applicability for hypersonic aerothermodynamic and scramjet research. In: Lu, F.K., Marren, D.E. (eds) Advanced hypersonic test facilities, pp. 239–253. AIAA, Reston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stalker R.J.: Isentropic compression of shock tube driver Gas. ARS J. 30, 564 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stalker R.J.: A study of the free-piston shock tunnel. AIAA Journal 5, 2160–2165 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs P.A.: L1d: A computer program for the simulation of transient-flow facilities. Report 1/99, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan R.G.: Free-piston driven expansion tubes. In: Ben-Dor, G., Igra, O., Elperin, T. (eds) Handbook of shock waves, vol.1, pp. 603–622. Elsevier, San Diego (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Paull A., Stalker R.J.: Test flow disturbances in an expansion tube. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 493–521 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hornung, H.G., Belanger, J.: Role and Techniques of Ground Testing for Simulation of Flows up to Orbital Speed. Proceedings of the AIAA 16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conference, Seattle, WA, Jul 18–20, AIAA-90–1377 (1990)

  18. Stalker, R.J.: Use of argon in a free piston shock tunnel. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Plasmadynamics Conference, Monterey, California, Mar 2–4, AIAA Paper No. 66–169 (1966)

  19. Itoh K., Ueda S., Komuro T., Sato K., Takahashi M., Myajima H., Tanno H., Muramoto H.: Improvement of a free piston driver for a high-enthalpy shock tunnel. Shock Waves 8, 215–233 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanno H., Itoh K., Komuro T., Sato K.: Experimental study on the tuned operation of a free piston driver. Shock Waves 10, 1–7 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stalker, R.J., Morgan, R.G.: The University of Queensland free piston shock tunnel T4—initial operation and preliminary calibration. In: Proceedings of the IEAust 4th National Space Engineering Symposium, Adelaide, Jul 12–14 (1988)

  22. Itoh K., Ueda S., Tanno H., Komuro T., Sato K.: Hypersonic aerothermodynamic and scramjet research using high enthalpy shock tunnel. Shock Waves 12, 93–98 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vennemann D.: Hypersonic test facilities available in Western Europe for aerodynamic/aerothermal and structure/material investigations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 357, 2227–2248 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morgan R.G.: Free-piston reflected shock tunnels. In: Ben-Dor, G., Igra, O., Elperin, T. (eds) Handbook of shock waves, vol. 1, pp. 587–601. Elsevier, San Diego (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Gildfind D.: Stress analysis of a new lightweight piston for X2. Report 2009/16, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Australia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson M.: Stress analysis of the HEG piston. Report DLR IB 224 2004 A 05, Institut für Aerodynamik und Strömungstechnik, Göttingen (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson W.: Impact strength of materials 1st Ed. Edward Arnold, London (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smerd R., Winkler A.S., Salisbury C., Worswick M., Lloyd D., Finn M.: High strain rate tensile testing of automotive aluminum alloy sheet. Int. J. Impact Engin. 32, 514–560 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scott, M.P.: Development and modelling of expansion tubes. PhD thesis, Centre for Hypersonics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia (2006)

  30. Hornung H.G.: The Piston Motion in a free-piston driver for shock tubes and tunnels. GALCIT Report FM 88-1, Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories CALTECH, California (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bakos, R.J., Erdos, J.I.: Options for Enhancement of the Performance of Shock-Expansion Tubes and Tunnels. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan 9–12, AIAA 95-0799 (1995)

  32. Jacobs P.A., Gollan R.J.: The Eilmer3 Code: user guide and example book. Mechanical Engineering Report 2008/07, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. McGilvray, M.: The use of expansion tube facilities for scramjet testing. PhD thesis, Centre for Hypersonics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia (2008)

  34. Mundt C., Boyce R., Jacobs P., Hannemann K.: Validation study of numerical simulations by comparison to measurements in piston-driven shock-tunnels. Aerospace Sci. Technol. 11, 100–109 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobs, P.A., Gardener, A.D., Buttsworth, D.R., Martinez Schramm, J., Karl, S., Hannemann, K.: End-to-end modelling of the HEG shock tunnel. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Beijing, China, Jul 11–16 (2004)

  36. Hornung, H.: Performance data of the new free-piston shock tunnel at GALCIT. In: Proceedings of the 17th Aerospace Ground Testing Conference, Nashville, TN, Jul 6–8, AIAA-1992-3943 (1992)

  37. Itoh K., Komuro T., Sato K., Ueda S., Tanno H., Takahashi M.: Characteristics of free-piston shock tunnel HIEST (1st Report, Tuned Operation of Free-Piston Driver). Trans. Jpn Soc. Mech. Engineers 68, 2968–2975 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    D. E. Gildfind, R. G. Morgan, P. A. Jacobs, R. J. Stalker & T. N. Eichmann

  2. The University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK

    M. McGilvray

Authors
  1. D. E. Gildfind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. G. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. McGilvray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. A. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. J. Stalker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. N. Eichmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. E. Gildfind.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Hannemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gildfind, D.E., Morgan, R.G., McGilvray, M. et al. Free-piston driver optimisation for simulation of high Mach number scramjet flow conditions. Shock Waves 21, 559–572 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-011-0336-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-011-0336-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation