Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors for persistent urodynamic stress incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery with and without midurethral sling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this study was to identify the predictors for persistent urodynamic stress incontinence (P-USI) in women following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) with and without midurethral sling (MUS).

Mmethods

A total of 1,017 women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery from January 2005 to December 2013 in our institutions were analyzed. We included 349 USI women who had extensive PRS for POP stage III or more of whom 209 underwent concomitant MUS.

Results

Of the women who underwent extensive PRS without MUS, 64.3 % (90/140) developed P-USI compared to only 10.5 % (22/209) of those who had concomitant MUS. Those with concomitant MUS and PRS alone were at higher risk of developing P-USI if they had overt USI [odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.3–4.0, p = 0.014 and OR 4.7, 95 % CI 2.0–11.3, p < 0.001, respectively], maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) of < 60 cm H2O (OR 5.0, 95 % CI 3.0–8.1, p < 0.001 and OR 5.3, 95 % CI 2.7–10.4, p < 0.001, respectively), and functional urethral length (FUL) of < 2 cm (OR 5.4, 95 % CI 2.7–8.8, p < 0.001 and OR 3.9, 95 % CI 2.4–6.9, p < 0.001, respectively). Parity ≥ 6 (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.7–5.2, p < 0.001) and Prolift T (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.9–4, p < 0.001) posed a higher risk of P-USI in those with concomitant surgery. Perigee and Avaulta A seemed to be protective against P-USI in those without MUS.

Conclusions

Overt USI with advanced POP together with low MUCP and FUL values have a higher risk of developing P-USI. Therefore, counseling these women is worthwhile while considering the type of mesh used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grody MH (1998) Urinary incontinence and concomitant prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 41:777–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lensen EJM, Withagen MIJ, Kluivers KB et al (2013) Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 32:455–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatton B (2009) Is there any evidence to advocate SUI prevention in continent women undergoing prolapse repair? An overview. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:235–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon D, Gold RS, Pauzner D, Lessing JB, Groutz A (2001) Combined genitourinary prolapse repair and prophylactic tension-free vaginal tape in women with severe prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: preliminary results. Urology 58:547–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Groutz A, Gold R, Pauzner D et al (2004) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for the treatment of occult stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing prolapse repair: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases. Neurourol Urodyn 23:632–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers RG (2006) The vexing problem of hidden incontinence. N Engl J Med 354:1627–1629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aungst MJ, Friedman EB, von Pechmann WS, Horbach NS, Welgoss JA (2009) De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:73.e1–73.e7

  8. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P et al (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:743–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco A, Weber AM, Cundiff GW et al (2008) Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without Burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 112:49–55

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Kenton K et al (2012) A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med 366:2358–2367

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borstad E, Abdelnoor M, Mogimi K et al (2008) Surgery for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. A multicenter prospective randomized trial to compare the results of an incontinence procedure performed at the same time of prolapse repair or 3 months after. Neurourol Urodyn 27:713

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ et al (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 4(10):e297. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang CC, Chang YL, Chang SD, Lo TS, Soong YK (2004) Pessary test to predict postoperative urinary incontinence in women undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104:795–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rane A, Kannan K, Barry C, Balakrishnan S, Lim Y, Corstiaans A (2008) Prospective study of the Perigee system for the management of cystoceles—medium-term follow-up. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48:427–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo TS, Ashok K (2011) Combined anterior trans-obturator mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with severe prolapse—a case series of 30 months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 22(3):299–306. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1266-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo TS, Tan YL, Khanuengkitkong S, Dass AK, Wu PY, Cortes EFM et al (2014) Assessment of collagen coated anterior mesh through morphology and clinical outcomes in pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:753–761

  18. Lo TS (2010) One-year outcome of the concurrent anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh surgery for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse: case series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):473–479

  19. Lo TS, Karim NB, Cortes EFM, Wu PY, Lin YH, Tan YL (2015) Comparison between Elevate anterior/apical system and Perigee system in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: clinical and sonographic outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 26:391–400

  20. Miyazaki FS (1987) Miya Hook ligature carrier for sacrospinous ligament fixation. Obstet Gynecol 70(2):286–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Tayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2004) Combined genital prolapse repair reinforced with a polypropylene mesh and tension-free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective case-control study with short-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83: 950–954

  22. Borstad E, Abdelnoor M, Staff AC, Kulseng-Hanssen S (2010) Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapsed and urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 21:179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Winters JC (2008) A critical appraisal of preventive slings and prolapse surgery—what’s a urologist to do? J Urol 180:809–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2011) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 22:1445–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Constantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M (2008) Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol 180:1007–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sørensen S, Waechter PB, Constantinou CE, Kirkeby HJ, Jønler M, Djurhuus JC (1991) Urethral pressure and pressure variations in healthy fertile and postmenopausal women with reference to the female sex hormones. J Urol 146:1434–1440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gad N, Duvvuru A, Burchgart B (2013) Outcome of Prolift repair in treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed and its effect on lower urinary tract symptoms: 5-year retrospective case study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(1):243–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kawasaki A, Wu JM, Amundsen CL et al (2012) Do urodynamic parameters predict persistent postoperative stress incontinence after midurethral sling? A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 23:813–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to all the colleagues for their contribution to this study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsia-Shu Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, TS., Nawawi, E.A., Wu, PY. et al. Predictors for persistent urodynamic stress incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery with and without midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J 27, 399–406 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2837-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2837-z

Keywords

Navigation