Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pelvic floor muscle function in women with pelvic floor dysfunction

A retrospective chart review, 1992–2008

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objectives of this study were to investigate the level of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function in women with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) referred by gynaecologists and urologists for in-hospital pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), and to identity associated factors for a low level of PFM function.

Methods

Data of women with PFD referred to a PFMT programme were included in a retrospective chart review. Measurement of PFM function performed by digital vaginal palpation included: voluntary PFM contraction, PFM strength (Modified Oxford Grading Scale) and PFM static endurance.

Results

Data of 998 women, mean age 56 (SD 13) years, with PFD (urinary incontinence, n = 757, anal incontinence, n = 36, pelvic organ prolapse, n = 111, other PFD, n = 94) were analysed. In all, 690 women (70 %) were, at baseline, unable to perform correct voluntary PFM contraction, mean PFM strength was 1.5 (SD 1.0) points, mean PFM static endurance was 16.7 (SD 16.1) seconds. Age ≥ 65 years and year of referral > 2000 were significantly (p < 0.01) associated with the ability to perform correct PFM contraction. Likewise, year of referral was significantly associated with high PFM strength (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The majority of the women were unable to perform correct voluntary PFM contraction and almost all had low PFM strength. The most important factor associated with a low level of PFM function was age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, Bo K, Corcos J, Fowler C et al (2005) Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 24(4):374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME (2009) Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 28(4):295–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):4–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bo K, Finckenhagen HB (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(10):883–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira CH, Barbosa PB, de Oliveira SF, Antonio FI, Franco MM, Bo K (2011) Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer. Physiotherapy 97(2):132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Botelho S, Pereira LC, Marques J, Lanza AH, Amorim CF, Palma P et al (2012) Is there correlation between electromyography and digital palpation as means of measuring pelvic floor muscle contractility in nulliparous, pregnant, and postpartum women? Neurourol Urodyn 32(5):420–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Staskin D, Kelleher C, Avery K (2009) Initial assessment of urinary incontinence and faecal incontinence in adult male and female patients. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wein A, Khoury S (eds) Incontinence: 4th international consultation on incontinence. Health Publications, Paris, pp 311–412

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kepenekci I, Keskinkilic B, Akinsu F, Cakir P, Elhan AH, Erkek AB et al (2011) Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in the female population and the impact of age, mode of delivery, and parity. Dis Colon Rectum 54(1):85–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tibaek S, Dehlendorff C (2013) Do women with pelvic floor dysfunction referred by gynaecologists and urologists at hospitals complete a pelvic floor muscle training programme? A retrospective study, 1992–2008. Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1361–1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bump RC, Hurt WG, Fantl JA, Wyman JF (1991) Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(2):322–327, discussion 327–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laycock J, Jerwood D (2001) Pelvic floor muscle assessment: the PERFECT scheme. Physiotherapy 87(12):631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harrell Jr FE (2011) Modelling strategies. R package version 3.3–2

  14. Bø K (1998) Effect of electrical stimulation on stress and urge urinary incontinence. Clinical outcome and practical recommendations based on randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 168:3–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adekanmi OA, Edwards GJ, Barrington JW (2002) The variation in urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynaecol 22(1):48–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Talasz H, Gosch M, Enzelsberger H, Rhomberg HP (2005) Female geriatric patients with urinary incontinence symptoms and their control over pelvic floor muscles. Z Gerontol Geriatr 38(6):424–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Henderson JW, Wang S, Egger MJ, Masters M, Nygaard I (2013) Can women correctly contract their pelvic floor muscles without formal instruction? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Talasz H, Himmer-Perschak G, Marth E, Fischer-Colbrie J, Hoefner E, Lechleitner M (2008) Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in a random group of adult women in Austria. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(1):131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madill SJ, Pontbriand-Drolet S, Tang A, Dumoulin C (2013) Effects of PFM rehabilitation on PFM function and morphology in older women. Neurourol Urodyn 32(8):1086–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Talasz H, Jansen SC, Kofler M, Lechleitner M (2012) High prevalence of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in hospitalized elderly women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 23(9):1231–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Braekken IH, Majida M, Engh ME, Bo K (2013) Are pelvic floor muscle thickness and size of levator hiatus associated with pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance and vaginal resting pressure in women with pelvic organ prolapse stages I–III? A cross sectional 3D ultrasound study. Neurourol Urodyn doi: 10.1002/nau.22384

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the physiotherapist Charlotte Salskov-Iversen for her participation as assessor and PFMT teacher in the study. Thanks are also due to the staff at the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.

Funding

None.

Financial disclaimer/conflict of interest

Neither of the authors have any conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigrid Tibaek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tibaek, S., Dehlendorff, C. Pelvic floor muscle function in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 25, 663–669 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2277-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2277-6

Keywords

Navigation