Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in a random group of adult women in Austria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite an increasing clinical interest in female pelvic floor function, there is a lack of data with respect to the knowledge of average adult women about the physiological role of the pelvic floor and their ability to contract pelvic floor muscles (PFM) voluntarily. It was the aim of our study to evaluate the percentage of PFM dysfunction in adult women and the impact of risk factors, such as age, body mass index (BMI), number of children delivered, and the influence of previous PFM training. A total of 343 Austrian adult women (mean age, 41.2 ± 14.6 years; range, 18–79 years), selected at random, were examined to test their ability to contract the PFM. The examination was carried out by three independent gynecologists during the course of a routine gynecological visit. The ability to contract the PFM voluntarily or involuntarily was assessed by digital intravaginal palpation with the patients in a supine position. The muscle strength was graded according to the Modified Oxford Grading Scale by Laycock. A high percentage (44.9%) of the women was not able to voluntarily perform a normal PFM contraction. In only 26.5%, an involuntary contraction of the pelvic floor was present before an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. The inability to contract the PFM did not correlate with women’s age but revealed a weak relationship with the number of childbirths and the patient’s BMI. A significant correlation was found between the Oxford Grading Scale rating and the patient’s report about previous PFM training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans, Bo K, Corcos J, Fowler C, Laycock J, Huat-Chye Lim P, van Lunsen R, Lycklama a Nijeholt G, Pemberton J, Wang A, Watier A, Van Kerrebroeck P (2005) Standardisation of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 24:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Talasz H, Gosch M, Enzelsberger H, Rhomberg HP (2005) Geriatrische Patientinnen mit Harninkontinenz-Symptomen und ihre Kontrolle über den Beckenboden. Z Gerontol Geriatr 38:424–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis K, Kumar D (2003) Pelvic floor dysfunction: a conceptual framework for collaborative patient-centred care. J Adv Nurs 43(6):555–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagen S, Stark D, Maher C, Adams E (2006) Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD003882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hay-Smith EJC, Bo K, Berghmanns LCM, Hendriks HJM, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ESC (2004) Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004. Wiley, Chichester, UK

  6. Schuessler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S (2002) Pelvic floor re-education: principles and practice. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frawley HC, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bo K (2006) Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn 25:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frawley H, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bo K (2006) Effect of test position on pelvic floor muscle assessment. Int Urogynecol J 17:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Laycock J, Standley A, Crothers E, Naylor D, Frank M, Garside S, Kiely E, Knight S, Pearson A (2001) Clinical guidelines for the physiotherapy management of females aged 16–65 with stress urinary incontinence. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laycock J (1994) Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schuessler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S (eds) Pelvic floor re-education: principles and practice. Springer, London, pp 42–47

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schuessler B (2002) (39–41) Aims of pelvic floor evaluation. In: Schuessler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S (eds) Pelvic floor re-education: principles and practice. London, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bo K, Larsen S, Oseid S, Kvarstein B, Hagen R, Jorgensen J (1888) Knowledge about and ability to correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 7(3):261–262

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz HP, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG (2003) Levator function in nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(1):24–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz HP, Wilson PD, Clarke B (2001) The use of perineal ultrasound to quantify levator activity and teach pelvic floor muscle exercises. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(3):166–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kegel AH (1948) Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 56:238–249

    Google Scholar 

  16. Theofrastus JP, Wyman JF Bump RC, McClish DK, Elser DM, Robinson D, Fantl JA (1997) Relationship between urethral and vaginal pressure during pelvic muscle contraction. Neurourol Urodynam 16:553–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson J, O’Sullivan P, Briffa NK, Neumann P (2006) Assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in continent and incontinent women using transperineal ultrasound, manual muscle testing and vaginal pressure measurements. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(3):166–169

    Google Scholar 

  18. Devreese A, Staes, F, De Weerdt W, Feys H, Van Assche A, Penninckx F, Vereecken R (2004) Clinical evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in continent and incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 23(3):190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bo K, Finckenhagen B (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: intertester reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bo K, Sherburn M (2005) Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther 85(3):269–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peschers UM, Gingelmaier A, Jundt K, Leib B, Dimpfl T (2001) Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength using four different techniques. Int Urogynecol J 12:27–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Talasz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talasz, H., Himmer-Perschak, G., Marth, E. et al. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in a random group of adult women in Austria. Int Urogynecol J 19, 131–135 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0404-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0404-y

Keywords

Navigation