Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of late complications of retropubic and transobturator slings in stress urinary incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To compare the late complication profiles between retropubic and transobturator slings used for stress urinary incontinence was the objective of the study.

Methods

Between the years 2003 and 2010, 338 complications of midurethral slings were surgically managed in a tertiary referral center. For the purpose of study, we excluded slings that had materials other than monofilament polypropylene, patients with previous anti-incontinence surgeries, and patients who were suspected of having a neurologic bladder condition. This is a prospective and retrospective study of the complications of midurethral slings. The characteristics of complications in retropubic and transobturator routes were compared and analyzed.

Results

Two hundred eighty cases with midurethral sling complications were suitable for analysis. Of these, retropubic slings constituted 210 and transobturator 70. The time interval between the insertion of tape and onset of complications was similar in both groups. Within the two groups, obstructive symptoms were seen more frequently in the retropubic tapes group. Compared to the retropubic tapes group, the transobturator group had more number of complications related to persistent pain (10% tension-free vaginal tapes vs. 32% transobturator tapes), dyspareunia (3% vs. 18%), and tape-related infections (4% vs. 18%). There were no significant differences among the complication rates pertaining to de novo overactive bladder (49% vs. 44%), obstructive symptoms (48% vs. 30%), and contraction of sling material (5% vs. 8%).

Conclusions

Obstructive complications were seen more commonly in the retropubic tapes compared to the transobturator tapes. Transobturator tapes were more frequently associated with persistent pain, dyspareunia, and tape-related infections as compared to retropubic tapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Novara G, Ficarra V, Boscolo-Berto R, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2007) Tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of effectiveness. Eur Urol 52(3):663–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Novara G, Galfano A, Boscolo-Berto R, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Ficarra V, Artibani W (2008) Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol 53(2):288–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsivian A, Mogutin B, Kessler O, Korczak D, Levin S, Sidi AA (2004) Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: long-term results. J Urol 172(3):998–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kristensen I, Eldoma M, Williamson T, Wood S, Mainprize T, Ross S (2010) Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(11):1353–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Juma S, Brito CG (2007) Transobturator tape (TOT): two years follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn 26(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Z, Chen Y, Du GH et al (2010) Comparison of three kinds of mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urologia 77(1):37–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bracq A, Fourmarier M, Boutemy F et al (2006) Urodynamic changes after transobturator suburethral tape. Prog Urol 16(1):62–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Botros SM, Miller JJ, Goldberg RP et al (2007) Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence following trans obturator versus midurethral slings. Neurourol Urodyn 26(1):42–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Boulvain M, Dubuisson JB, Dällenbach P (2009) Complications associated with transobturator sling procedures: analysis of 233 consecutive cases with a 27 months follow-up. BMC Womens Health 9:28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Angioli R, Plotti F, Muzii L, Montera R, Panici PB, Zullo MA (2010) Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator suburethral tape: five-year follow-up results of a prospective, randomised trial. Eur Urol 58:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajadi KP, Vasavada SP (2010) Overactive bladder after sling surgery. Curr Urol Rep 11(6):366–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmgren C, Nilsson S, Lanner L, Hellberg D (2007) Frequency of de novo urgency in 463 women who had undergone the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for genuine stress urinary incontinence—a long-term follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132(1):121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schimpf MO, Patel M, O'Sullivan DM, Tulikangas PK (2009) Difference in quality of life in women with urge urinary incontinence compared to women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(7):781–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doo CK, Hong B, Chung BJ et al (2006) Five-year outcomes of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 50(2):333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang W, Zhu L, Lang J (2009) Transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104(2):113–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross S, Robert M, Swaby C et al (2009) Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1287–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng CL, Chin HY, Wang KH (2008) Transobturator vaginal tape inside out procedure for stress urinary incontinence: results of 102 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(10):1423–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth TM (2007) Management of persistent groin pain after transobturator slings. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(11):1371–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazouni C, Karsenty G, Bretelle F, Bladou F, Gamerre M, Serment G (2004) Urinary complications and sexual function after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(10):955–961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cholhan HJ, Hutchings TB, Rooney KE (2010) Dyspareunia associated with paraurethral banding in the transobturator sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(5):481, e1-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P (2007) Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG 114(5):522–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Deffieux X, Daher N, Mansoor A, Debodinance P, Muhlstein J, Fernandez H (2010) Transobturator TVT-O versus retropubic TVT: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 24 months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(11):1337–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Charalambous S, Touloupidis S, Fatles G et al (2008) Transvaginal vs transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(3):357–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mellier G, Mistrangelo E, Gery L, Philippe C, Patrice M (2007) Tension-free obturator tape (Monarc Subfascial Hammock) in patients with or without associated procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(2):165–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. But I (2005) Vaginal wall erosion after transobturator tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):506–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Domingo S, Alamá P, Ruiz N, Perales A, Pellicer A (2005) Diagnosis, management and prognosis of vaginal erosion after transobturator suburethral tape procedure using a nonwoven thermally bonded polypropylene mesh. J Urol 173(5):1627–1630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD et al (2010) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 58(2):218–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lowery WJ, Dooley Y, Kost E (2010) Small-pore polypropylene slings: still out there. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(1):125–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Flam F, Boijsen M, Lind F (2009) Necrotizing fasciitis following transobturator tape treated by extensive surgery and hyperbaric oxygen. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(1):113–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rardin CR, Moore R, Ward RM, Myers DL (2009) Recurrent thigh abscess with necrotizing fasciitis from a retained transobturator sling segment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(1):84–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This project was made possible through IUGA fellowship award funding 2010 to Dr. Kiran Ashok.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eckhard Petri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petri, E., Ashok, K. Comparison of late complications of retropubic and transobturator slings in stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 23, 321–325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1535-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1535-8

Keywords

Navigation