Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is significant risk of re-operation after pelvic reconstructive surgery. In an attempt to improve outcome, synthetic materials are increasingly being used to augment pelvic organ prolapse repair despite lack of strong evidence to support their routine use. The use of synthetic mesh to correct apical, anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse is not without complications. This review aims to evaluate the long-term complications of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gyneecol 98:646–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oslen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO et al (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baessler K, Maher C (2006) Mesh augmentation during pelvic floor reconstruction surgery: risks and benefits. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 18(5):560–566

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cervigini M, Natale F (2001) The use of synthetics in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol 11(4):429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Timmons MC, Addison WA (1997) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Pelvic Surg 3:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  6. Valatis SR, Stanton SL (1994) Sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective study of a clinician’s experience. BJOG 101:518–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohli N, Walsh PM, Roat TW, Karram MM (1998) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 92:999–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, Adams EJ, Hage S (2007) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004014. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3

  9. Nilsson CG, Falconer C, Rezapour M (2004) Seven-year follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104:1259–1262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brubaker L, Bump RC, Fynes M et al (2005) Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Koury S et al (eds) 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Health, Paris, pp 1371–1402

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winters JC, Fitzgrerald MP, Barber MD (2006) The use of synthetic mesh in female reconstructive surgery. BJU International 98(suppl 1):70–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ridgeway B, Chen CG, Praiso MFR (2008) The use of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 51(1):136–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilger WS, Cornella JL (2006) Rectovaginal fistula after posterior intravaginal slingplasty and polypropylene mesh augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(1):89–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altman D, Falconer C (2007) Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 109:303–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hefni M, Yousri N, El-Toukhy T et al (2007) Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:499–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yee YH, Lu CC, Kung FT, Huang KH (2008) Rectocutaneous fistula: a rare complication of the posterior intravaginal sling. Int Urogynaecol J Pelvic Dysfunct 19(4):599–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen CCG, Ridgeway B, Paraiso MFR (2007) Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 50(2):383–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Amid P (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deprest J, Zheng F, Konstantinovic M et al (2006) The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapsed repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:S16–S25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Le TH, Kon L, Bhatia NN, Ostergard R (2007) Update on the utilization of grafts in pelvic reconstruction surgeries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:480–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Birch C, Fynes MM (2002) The role of synthetic and biological prosthesies in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:527–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M (2005) Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG 112:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Creighton SM, Stanton SL (1991) The surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse. BJOG 98:1150–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Deval B, Rafii A, Azria E, Darai E, Levardon M (2003) Vaginal mesh erosion 7 years after a sacral colpopexy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(7):674–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T et al (2007) Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 110:455–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomised trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(6):1299–1304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flood CG, Drutz HP, Waja L (1998) Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9:200–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Julian TM (1996) The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1472–1475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de Tayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud A, Fernandez H (2005) Tension-free polypropylene mesh for vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. J Reprod Med 50:75–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Natale F, Marziali S, Cervigni M (2000) Tension-free cystocele repair (TCR): long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:S51 Absract #FDP 45

    Google Scholar 

  31. de Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J (2007) Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1-year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. The French Ugytex Study Group et al Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Deffieux X, de Tayrac R, Huel C, Bottero J, Gervaise A, Bonnet K, Frydman R, Fernandez H (2007) Vaginal mesh erosion after transvaginal repair of cystocele using Gynemesh or Gynemesh-Soft in 138 women: a comparative study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(1):73–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Culligan PJ (2005) Surgical repair of the posterior compartment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 48(3):704–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. de Tayrac R, Picone O, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2006) A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parker MC, Phillips RKS (1993) Repair of rectocele using Marlex mesh. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 75:193–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S et al (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183:257–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lim YN, Rane A, Muller R (2005) An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl–Prolene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(2):126–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nygaard I, McCrary R, Brubaker L et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1997) The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8:105–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Visco AG, Weidner AC, Barber MD, Myers ER, Cundiff GW, Bump RC et al (2001) Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:297–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mistrangelo E, Mancuso S, Nadalini C et al (2007) Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5):564–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Achtari C, Hiscock R, O’Reily BA, Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL (2005) Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynaecol J Pelvic Dysfunct 16(5):389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P et al (2006) Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(4):315–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Falagas ME, Velakoulis S, Iavazzo C, Athanasiou S (2007) Mesh-related infections after pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 134(2):147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Iosif CS (1993) Abdominal sacral colpopexy with use of synthetic mesh. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 72(3):214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. South MM, Foster RT, Webster GD, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL (2007) Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(6):615.e1–615.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Elneil S, Cutner AS, Remy M, Leather AT, Toozs-Hobson P, Wise B (2005) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. BJOG 112(4):486–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mercer-Jones MA, Sprowson A, Varma JS (2004) Outcome after transperineal mesh repair of rectocele: a case series. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):864–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Baessler K, Hewson AD, Tunn R, Schuessler B, Maher CF (2005) Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty. Obstet Gynecol 106(4):713–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, Walsh W, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG (2003) Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hung MJ, Liu FS, Shen PS et al (2004) Factors that affect recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy procedure reinforced with four-corner anchored polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:399–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111(8):831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lim YN, Muller R, Corstiaans A et al (2007) A long-term review of posterior colporrhaphy with Vypro 2 mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1053–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomised study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Whitehead WE (2006) Postoperative gastrointestinal complications after abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advance pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 17:S391–S392

    Google Scholar 

  56. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008) IPG267 Surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse using mesh: guidance. NICE, England and Wales Issue date: June 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

Manufacturers did not sponsor this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Derby City General Hospital, Uttoxetter Road, Derby, UK

    Abdulmalik Bako & Ruchika Dhar

Authors
  1. Abdulmalik Bako
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruchika Dhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulmalik Bako.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bako, A., Dhar, R. Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 20, 103–111 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0717-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0717-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation