Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the occurrence of mesh erosion (ME) during the first 6 post-operative months in patients having undergone transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with Atrium or Vypro II mesh. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 198 consecutive patients who underwent vaginal reconstructive surgery reinforced either by Atrium or Vypro II mesh between February 1999 and July 2003. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess associations between measured covariates and ME. Fourteen patients [7.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9–11.6] developed vaginal ME. We found that, in the Vypro II mesh patients, the surgeon experienced in the technique had less erosions than less experienced surgeons (2.9 vs 15.6%, p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between the monofilament polypropylene (Atrium) and the composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh (7.2 vs 6.9%, p=0.41) when adjusted for surgeon experience and patient age. There was no association between mesh type (Atrium or Vypro II) and vaginal ME following transvaginal repair of POP. Surgeon experience and patient age were associated with ME.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL (1976) A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:568–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber AM, Walters MD (1997) Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 89:311–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nathan JD, Pappas TN (2003) Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions. Ann Surg 238 [6 Suppl]:S148–S157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flood CG, Drutz HP, Waja L (1998) Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9:200–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collett D (2003) Modelling binary data, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

  9. DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1717–1724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shull BL (1999) Pelvic organ prolapse: anterior, superior, and posterior vaginal segment defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:6–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Julian TM (1996) The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1472–1475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Birch C, Fynes MM (2002) The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohli N, Walsh PM, Roat TW, Karram MM (1998) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 92:999–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Visco AG, Weidner AC, Barber MD, Myers ER, Cundiff GW, Bump RC et al (2001) Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:297–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuuva N, Nilsson CG (2002) A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levin I, Groutz A, Gold R, Pauzner D, Lessing JB, Gordon D (2004) Surgical complications and medium-term outcome results of tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective study of 313 consecutive patients. Neurourol Urodyn 23:7–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Schumpelick V (1999) Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 165:665–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vetere PF, Putterman S, Kesselman E (2003) Major reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women, including the medically compromised. J Reprod Med 48:417–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobashi KC, Govier FE (2003) Management of vaginal erosion of polypropylene mesh slings. J Urol 169:2242–2243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chahin Achtari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Achtari, C., Hiscock, R., O’Reilly, B.A. et al. Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J 16, 389–394 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1272-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1272-3

Keywords

Navigation