Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of polypropylene mesh surgery with the site-specific repair surgeries in the treatment of cystocoeles. We randomized 90 patients into two groups according to a computer-based program. After a 12-month (mean) follow up, we noticed that the polypropylene mesh surgery yielded good anatomical results. Acceptable anatomical cure rates were 91 and 72% in the mesh surgery group and site-specific surgery group, respectively. There were three cases (6.9%) of mesh erosion. One case of urinary retention and two cases of de novo dyspareunia were seen in the mesh surgery group. De novo stress urinary incontinence developed in three patients in the site-specific surgery group. We concluded that surgery with light polypropylene mesh (Sofradim®, Parietene) is superior to the site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoeles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sola V, Pardo J, Ricci P, Guiloff E (2006) Tension free monofilament macropore polypropylene mesh (Gynemesh PS) in female genital prolapse repair. Int Braz J Urol 32:410–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–1306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker MC, Phillips RK (1993) Repair of rectocoele using Marlex mesh. Ann R Coll Engl 75(3):193–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. deTayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J, Villard P, Guilbaud O, Eglin G, The French Ugytex Group (2007) Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1 year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. Int Urogynecol J 18:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardoza L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: A validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(3):176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber A (1999) Surgical correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse In: Walters MD, Karram MM (eds) Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Mosby, pp 211–219

  7. Maher C, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence based literature review. Int Urogynecol J 17:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan A, Anne M, Karine A, Vanessa F, Christophe P, Anne T, Patrick M (2004) Cystocoele repair by a synthetic vaginal mesh secured anteriorly through the obturator foramen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115:90–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, Goldberg R (2001) Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Sivaslioglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivaslioglu, A.A., Unlubilgin, E. & Dolen, I. A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J 19, 467–471 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y

Keywords

Navigation