Skip to main content
Log in

Neural pain after uterosacral ligament vaginal suspension

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neural compromise has been reported after a wide variety of reconstructive pelvic procedures. We report on two women who had undergone a seemingly uncomplicated transvaginal uterosacral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Both women presented shortly after surgery with a unilateral, shooting groin pain with radiation along the ipsilateral lumbosacral nerve distribution. Surgical removal of the permanent stitch and physical therapy provided prompt and near-complete relief. This case report describes the possibility of neural compromise after uterosacral ligament suspension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC et al (2000) Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1402–1410; discussion 1410–1411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW et al (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S et al (2001) High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1339–1342; discussion 1342–1343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller N (1927) A new method of correcting complete inversion of the vagina: with or without complete prolapse; report of two cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet 550–555

  5. Aronson MP, Aronson PK, Howard AE (2005) Low risk of ureteral obstruction with “deep” (dorsal/posterior) uterosacral ligament suture placement for transvaginal apical suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1530–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Verdeja AM, Elkins TE, Odoi A et al (1995) Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: anatomic landmarks to be aware of to minimize complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1468–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW et al (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97:873–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutman RE, Pannu HK, Cundiff GW et al (2005) Anatomic relationship between the vaginal apex and the bony architecture of the pelvis: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1544–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lior Lowenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lowenstein, L., Dooley, Y., Kenton, K. et al. Neural pain after uterosacral ligament vaginal suspension. Int Urogynecol J 18, 109–110 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0082-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0082-1

Keywords

Navigation