Skip to main content

Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Options for Transvaginal Surgical Repair

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

Apical compartment prolapse results from failure of the uterosacral and cardinal ligament complex. Apical prolapse should always be assessed and the need for concomitant apical repair should be considered when planning a surgery for the anterior and posterior compartment. Transvaginal repair techniques offer the most minimally invasive surgical approach. No transvaginal repair technique has been shown to be superior in regard to either anatomic or symptomatic cure. The most common transvaginal repair techniques for the vaginal apex are sacrospinous ligament suspension and uterosacral ligament suspension. Both can be performed with or without the uterus in situ. Sacrospinous ligament fixation procedure involves the fixation of the apex of the vagina to the sacrospinous ligament, typically performed unilaterally, and more commonly performed for post-hysterectomy prolapse. Uterosacral ligament suspension involves placing one or more sutures into the bilateral uterosacral ligaments. It is commonly performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy when intraperitoneal access has already been achieved. Five-year outcome data for both techniques has shown that approximately half of patients will have some recurrent bulge symptoms and be found to have prolapse to the level of the hymen. Ten percent of patients require retreatment (pessary or surgery) and the five-year mark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):233.e1–233.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1402–10. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.111298. discussion 1410-1. PMID: 11120503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beer M, Kuhn A. Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119(2):144–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.042. PMID: 15808370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clemons JL, Weinstein M, Guess MK, Alperin M, Moalli P, Gregory WT, et al. Impact of the 2011 FDA transvaginal mesh safety update on AUGS members’ use of synthetic mesh and biologic grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg [Internet] 19(4):191–198. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23797515

  6. Colombo M, Milani R. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):13–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeLancey JO. The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:313–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717. PMID: 26206451; PMCID: PMC4512203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eilber KS, Alperin M, Khan A, et al. Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:981–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flynn MK, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL. Sensory nerve injury after uterosacral ligament suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1869–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.059. Epub 2006 Oct 2. PMID: 17014812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(15):1554–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.2827.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, et al. The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse (review). Summary of fndings for the main comparison. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;30(4):CD004014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014. pub5. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11:CD004014. PMID: 23633316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Margulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):124–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052. PMID: 20113690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pahwa AK, Arya LA, Andy UU. Management of arterial and venous hemorrhage during sacrospinous ligament fixation: cases and review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(3):387–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2818-2. Epub 2015 Aug 19. PMID: 26282092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richter H, Sridhar A, Nager C, Komesu Y, Zyczynski H, Harvie H, Radin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S. Risk factors associated with surgical failure over 5 years in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs. vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 2021;27(10S):S1–S129. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Serati M, Braga A, Bogani G, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Sorice P, Ghezzi F, Salvatore S. Iliococcygeus fixation for the treatment of apical vaginal prolapse: efficacy and safety at 5 years of follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):1007–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2629-5. Epub 2015 Feb 5. PMID: 25653034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schön Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL. Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(6):642–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0088-8. Epub 2006 May 30. PMID: 16733625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, Sanses TV, Steinberg AC, South MM, Balk EM, Sung VW; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000570. PMID: 25560102; PMCID: PMC4352548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Siddiqui NY, Mitchell TRT, Bentley RC, Weidner AC. Neural entrapment during uterosacral ligament suspension: an anatomic study of female cadavers. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(3):708–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ec658a. PMID: 20733456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Siff Lauren N, Jallad K, Hickman LC, Walters MD. Surgical Anatomy of the Uterosacral Ligament Colpopexy. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 2018;24(5):380–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith BC, Herfel CV, Yeung J, Shatkin-Margolis A, Crisp CC, Kleeman SD, Pauls RN. Uterosacral ligament suspension: a radiographic study of suture location in live subjects. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(9):541–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000629. PMID: 30180050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):372–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson JR, Gibb JS, Genadry R, Burrows L, Lambrou N, Buller JL. Anatomy of pelvic arteries adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: importance of the coccygeal branch of the inferior gluteal artery. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):973–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00418-4. PMID: 10576185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Unger CA, Walters MD. Gluteal and posterior thigh pain in the postoperative period and the need for intervention after sacrospinous ligament colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(4):208–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000091. PMID: 24978086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vaughan MH, Siddiqui NY, Newcomb LK, Weidner AC, Kawasaki A, Visco AG, Bradley MS. Surgical alteration of genital hiatus size and anatomic failure after vaginal vault suspension. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(6):1137–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002593. PMID: 29742664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wieslander CK, Roshanravan SM, Wai CY, Schaffer JI, Corton MM. Uterosacral ligament suspension sutures: Anatomic relationships in unembalmed female cadavers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):672.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.065. PMID: 18060977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Nitti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Torosis, M., Nitti, V. (2023). Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Options for Transvaginal Surgical Repair. In: Martins, F.E., Holm, H.V., Sandhu, J., McCammon, K.A. (eds) Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71112-2_34-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71112-2_34-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71112-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71112-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics