Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urethral injection for stress urinary incontinence: long-term results with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urethral injection is a convenient, minimally invasive means of treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We present long-term follow-up data from 20 patients originally recruited in 1994–95 (mean age 67 years) to receive urethral injection with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) copolymer. The majority of patients had failed previous therapy for SUI. If the first injection was unsuccessful, up to two further injections were offered. Only 3 patients (15%) failed to show a response to treatment. Sixteen women were reassessed during 2001 (4 had died of causes unrelated to the study treatment). A sustained response throughout the follow-up period was reported in 9/16 patients (57%), with incontinence recurring in just 4 (25%). None of the 7 patients with persistent or recurrent incontinence were cured by subsequent treatments, including surgery. In conclusion, urethral injection with Dx/HA copolymer offers promising long-term efficacy in the treatment of SUI, regardless of old age or failure to respond to previous therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

VUR:

Vesicoureteral reflux

References

  1. Bent AE, Foote J, Siegel S et al. (2001) Collagen implant for treating stress urinary incontinence in women with urethral hypermobility. J Urol 166:1354–1357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herschorn S, Glazer AA (2000) Early experience with small volume periurethral polytetrafluoroethylene for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 163:1838–1842

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA et al. (1997) Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. American Urological Association. J Urol 158:875–880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP et al. (1984) Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). JAMA 251:3277–3281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Henly DR, Barrett DM, Weiland TL et al. (1995) Particulate silicone for use in periurethral injections: local tissue effects and search for migration. J Urol 153:2039–2043

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatanaka S, Oneda S, Okazi K et al. (1993) Induction of malignant fibrous histiocytoma in female Fisher rays by implantation of cyanoacrylate, zirconia, polyvinyl chloride or silicone. In Vivo 7:111–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dmochowski RR, Appell RA (2000) Injectable agents in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: where are we now? Urology 56:32–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herschorn S, Radomski SB (1997) Collagen injections for genuine stress urinary incontinence: patient selection and durability. Int Urogynecol J 8:18–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stenberg AM, Sundin A, Larsson BS et al. (1997) Lack of distant migration after injection of a 125iodine labeled dextranomer based implant into the rabbit bladder. J Urol 158:1937–1941

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stenberg AM, Larsson E, Lindholm A et al. (1999) Injectable dextranomer-based implant: histopathology, volume changes and DNA analysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 33:355–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lackgren G, Wahlin N, Skoldenberg E et al. (2001) Long-term followup of children treated with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer for vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 166:1887–1892

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stenberg AM, Larsson G, Johnson P et al. (1999) DiHA Dextran Copolymer, a new biocompatible material for endoscopic treatment of stress incontinent women. Short term results. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:436–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison SC, Brown C, O'Boyle PJ (1993) Periurethral Teflon for stress urinary incontinence: medium-term results. Br J Urol 71:25–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harriss DR, Iacovou JW, Lemberger RJ (1996) Peri-urethral silicone microimplants (Macroplastique) for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Br J Urol 78:722–725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Capozza N, Patricolo M, Lais A et al. (2001) Endoscopic treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux: twelve years' experience. Urol Int 67:228–231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Å. M. Stenberg.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: These investigators present long-term follow-up on a newer periurethral injectable material, dextranomer/hyaluronic copolymer, for stress incontinence. The limited sample size of 20 patients with only 13 patients evaluable at 5 years, is one major disadvantage of this study; however, 69% of patients had a sustained response to urethral injection on post-operative subjective and objective testing which represents an improvement over existing injectable materials. Advantages of this material over some of the presently available agents include improved durability, lack of need for skin-testing and no reported autoimmune or migratory complications. Certainly, long-term data on more patients would be appropriate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenberg, Å.M., Larsson, G. & Johnson, P. Urethral injection for stress urinary incontinence: long-term results with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer. Int Urogynecol J 14, 335–338 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1075-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1075-y

Keywords

Navigation