Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Periurethral injection with polyacrylamide after previous TVT surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this registry study was to assess the clinical utility of using periurethral bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after previous midurethral sling surgery.

Methods

The study period was 2007 through 2019. Using data from the Norwegian Female Incontinence Registry we included 57 women who had received Bulkamid® because of insufficient improvement or recurrent SUI after previous retropubic TVT surgery. The primary outcome was cure of SUI, and secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, degree of leakage, change in urgency incontinence (UUI), free flow rate, postvoid residual volume, and complications. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare pre- and postoperative results for pairs, with level of significance at p < 0.05.

Results

Pure SUI was seen in 19 (33.3%) while 38 (66.7%) had mixed incontinence. Postoperatively 72.9% had a negative stress test and 73.7% were satisfied with treatment. There was only 1 complication in 67 injections (1.5%). De novo UUI occurred in five patients, corresponding to 8.8% of the whole study group, but 26.3% among those with no preoperative UUI problems. Among the patients with preoperative UUI, 39.5% were cured of this problem and a further 36.8% were improved.

Conclusions

The cure rate and satisfaction rate of periurethral bulking with polyacrylamide after previous MUS are favorable and complications are rare. There seems to be a risk of overactive bladder symptoms developing in women with no such symptoms preoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakali E, Johnson E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, Walker B, Tincello DG. Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD009407. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009407.pub3.

  2. Rovner E, Athanasiou S, Choo M-S et al. Surgery for urinary incontinence in women. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A et al, eds. Incontinence 6th Edition. www.ics.org, 2017: 1792-1804.

  3. Gaddi A, Guaderrama N, Bassiouni N, Bebchuk J, Whitcomb EL. Repeat midurethral sling compared with urethral bulking for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1207–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark R, Welk B. The use of polyacrylamide hydrogel in the setting of failed female stress incontinence surgery. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12:95–97. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4838.

  5. Martan A, Mašata J, Švabík K, El-Haddad R, Hubka P, Krhut J. Transurethral injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid®) for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed tape surgery. Čes Gynek. 2015;80:25–9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25723075.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zivanovic I, Rautenberg O, Lobodasch K, von Bünau G, Walser C, Viereck V. Urethral bulking for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling failure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:722–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulseng-Hanssen S, Borstad E. The development of a questionnaire to measure the severity of symptoms and the quality of life before and after surgery for stress incontinence. BJOG. 2003;110:983–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berild GH, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Reproducibility of a cough and jump stress test for the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1449–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1733-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Chao F, et al. Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183:241–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verbrugghe A, de Ridder D, Van der Aa F. A repeat mid-urethral sling as valuable treatment for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1971-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim TH, You HW, Ryu DS, Lee KS. Surgical outcome of a repeat midurethral sling procedure after failure of a first procedure. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1759–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2773-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smithling KR, Adams-Piper EE, Tran AM, Davé BA, Chu CM, Chan RC, et al. Efficacy of repeat midurethral sling for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a fellows pelvic research network study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25:430–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Bogani G, Meschia M, Sorice P, Braga A, Salvatore S, et al. Urethral bulking agents versus other surgical procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;189:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddiqui ZA, Abboudi H, Crawford R, Shah S. Intraurethral bulking agents for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1275–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3278-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. ltkonen Freitas A-M, Mentula M, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Tulokas S, Mikkola TS. Tension-free vaginal tape surgery versus polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2020;203:372–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bach F, Toozs-Hobson P. An analysis of 1386 periurethral bulking procedures with comparison to 18,763 retropubic tapes. Post Reprod Health. 2020;26:71–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053369120924929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kasi AD, Pergialiotis V, Perrea DN, Khunda A, Doumouchtsis SK. Polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid®) for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:367–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2781-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiøtz HA, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Svenningsen R. Comparison of retropubic midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;31:711–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04080-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toozs-Hobson P, Devani P, Pick J, Moran PA, Assassa P, Burton C. Does age affect the outcome of suburethral tape surgery? The importance of national registries in answering bigger questions. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1541–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2995-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rovner E, Gomelsky A, Athanasiou S, Choo M-S, Cosson M, Dmochowski R, Gomelsky A, Gomes C, Monga A, Nager C, Ng R. Surgery for urinary incontinence in women. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A et al., editors. Incontinence 6th edition.; 2017. pp. 1743–854. www.ics.org.

  21. Engen M, Svenningsen R, Schiotz HA, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Mid-urethral slings in young, middle-aged and older women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37: 2578–2585. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23583.

  22. Lose G, Sørensen HC, Axelsen SM, Falconer C, Lobodasch K, Safwat T. An open multicenter study of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid®) for female stress and mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1471–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1214-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. de Vries AM, Wadhwa H, Huang J, Farag F, Heesakkers JPFA, Kocjancic E. Complications of urethral bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence: an extensive review including case reports. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(6):392–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7: Art. No.: CD006375. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.

  25. Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T, et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0495-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Tomislav Dimoski, MBA, system developer at the registry, designed the application we used to extract the data. Statistician Tore Morten Viland, MA, gave valuable statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS Myhr: Protocol development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing

M Rakovan: Data analysis, manuscript editing

HA Schiotz: Protocol development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hjalmar A. Schiøtz.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimers/Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Myhr, S.S., Rakovan, M. & Schiøtz, H.A. Periurethral injection with polyacrylamide after previous TVT surgery. Int Urogynecol J 33, 1017–1022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04891-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04891-y

Keywords

Navigation