Abstract
The goal of this paper is to present the finite element scheme for solving the Earth potential problems in 3D domains above the Earth surface. To that goal we formulate the boundary-value problem (BVP) consisting of the Laplace equation outside the Earth accompanied by the Neumann as well as the Dirichlet boundary conditions (BC). The 3D computational domain consists of the bottom boundary in the form of a spherical approximation or real triangulation of the Earth’s surface on which surface gravity disturbances are given. We introduce additional upper (spherical) and side (planar and conical) boundaries where the Dirichlet BC is given. Solution of such elliptic BVP is understood in a weak sense, it always exists and is unique and can be efficiently found by the finite element method (FEM). We briefly present derivation of FEM for such type of problems including main discretization ideas. This method leads to a solution of the sparse symmetric linear systems which give the Earth’s potential solution in every discrete node of the 3D computational domain. In this point our method differs from other numerical approaches, e.g. boundary element method (BEM) where the potential is sought on a hypersurface only. We apply and test FEM in various situations. First, we compare the FEM solution with the known exact solution in case of homogeneous sphere. Then, we solve the geodetic BVP in continental scale using the DNSC08 data. We compare the results with the EGM2008 geopotential model. Finally, we study the precision of our solution by the GPS/levelling test in Slovakia where we use terrestrial gravimetric measurements as input data. All tests show qualitative and quantitative agreement with the given solutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen OB, Knudsen P, Berry P (2008) The DNSC08 ocean wide altimetry derived gravity field. Presented at EGU-2008, Vienna, Austria
Backus GE (1968) Application of a non-linear problem boundary-value problem for Laplace’s equation to gravity and geomagnetic intensity surveys. Q J Mech Appl Math 2: 195–221
Bjerhammar A, Svensson L (1983) On the geodetic boundary-value problem for a fixed boundary surface-satellite approach. Bull Géod 57: 382–393
Brenner SC, Scott LR (2002) The mathematical theory of finite element methods. 2. Springer-Verlag, New York
Čunderlík R (2004) The boundary element method applied to the Neumann geodetic boundary value problem. PhD. Thesis. SvF STU, Bratislava
Čunderlík R, Mikula K (2008) On high-resolution global gravity field modelling by direct BEM using DNSC08. In: Gravity, geoid and earth observation, IAG Symposia, vol 134. Springer (accepted in December, in press)
Čunderlík R, Mikula K, Mojzeš M (2000) The boundary element method applied to the determination of the global quasigeoid. Proceedings of ALGORITMY, pp 301–308
Čunderlík R, Mikula K, Mojzeš M (2008) Numerical solution of the linearized fixed gravimetric boundary-value problem. J Geod 82(1): 15–29
Grafarend EW (1989) The goid and the gravimetric boundary-value problem. Rep. 18, Department of Geod, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Holota P (1997) Coerciveness of the linear gravimetric boundary-value problem and a geometrical interpretation. J Geod 71(10): 640–651
Holota P (2005) Neumann’s boundary-value problem in studies on Earth gravity field: weak solution. 50 years of Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Prague, vol 50, pp 34, 49–69
Holota P, Nesvadba O (2008) Model refinements and numerical solutions of weakly formulated boundary-value problems in physical geodesy. In: Proceedings of VI Hotine-Marussi symposium on theoretical and computational geodesy. Springer, Berlin
Klees R (1992) Loesung des fixen geodaetischen Randwertprolems mit Hilfe der Randelementmethode. DGK. Reihe C., Nr. 382, Muenchen
Klees R (1995) Boundary value problems and approximation of integral equations by finite elements. Manuscr Geod 20: 345–361
Klees R (1998) Topics on boundary element methods. Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 65. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 482–531
Klees R, Van Gelderen M, Lage C, Schwab C (2001) Fast numerical solution of the linearized Molodensky prolem. J Geod 75: 349–362
Klobušiak M, Pecár J (2004) Model and algorithm of effective processing of gravity measurements performed with a group of absolute and relative gravimeters. GaKO 50/92, No. 4–5, pp 99–110
Koch KR, Pope AJ (1972) Uniqueness and existence for the geodetic boundary value problem using the known surface of the earth. Bull Géod 46: 467–476
Lehmann R (1977) Fast space-domain evaluation of geodetic surface integrals. J Geod 71: 533–540
Lehmann R (1997) Solving geodetic boundary value problems with parallel computers. Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter Geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 65. Springer, Berlin
Lehmann R, Klees R (1996) Parallel setup of Galerkin equation system for a geodetic boundary value problem. Boundary elements: implementation and analysis of advanced algorithms. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mehanics 54. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig
Mayer-Grr T (2007) ITG-Grace03s: The latest GRACE gravity field solution computed in Bonn. Presentation at GSTM+SPP, 15–17 October, Potsdam
Meissl P (1981) The use of finite elements in physical geodesy. Report 313, Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University
Mojzeš M, Janák J, Papčo J (2006) Improvement of the gravimetric model of quasigeoid in Slovakia. Newton’s Bulletin 3. http://bgi.cnes.fr:8110/Mojzes.pdf
Molodenskij MS, Jeremejev BF, Jurkina MI (1962) Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. Israel program for scientific translations, Jerusalem (translated from Russian original, Moscow 1960)
Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Helbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe
Nesvadba O, Holota P, Klees R (2007) A direct method and its numerical interpretation in the determination of the Earth’s gravity field from terrestrial data. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) Dynamic planet–monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools. IAG Symposium, Cairns, pp 370–376
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An Earth gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM2008, presented at the 2008 General Assembly of EGU, Vienna, Austria
Reddy JN (1993) An introduction to the finite element method. 2. Mc Graw-Hill, Singapore
Rektorys K (1974) Variační metody v inženýrských problémech a v problémech matematické fyziky. STNL, Praha (in Czech)
Sacerdote F, Sansó F (1989) On the analysis of the fixed-gravimetric boundary value problem. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Hotine-Marissi Symp. Math. Geod, Pisa, Politecnico di Milano, pp 507–516
Shaofeng B, Dingbo C (1991) The finite element method for the geodetic boundary value problem. Manuscr Geod 16: 353–359
Sideris MG, Schwarz KP (1986) Solving Molodensky’s series by fast Fourier transform techniques. Bull Geod 60: 51–63
Šprlák M, Janák J (2006) Gravity field modeling. New program for gravity field modeling by spherical harmonic functions. GaKO 1: 1–8
Stokes GG (1849) On the variation of gravity at the surface of the Earth. Trans Cambridge Philos Soc 8(5): 672–695
Tscherning CC (1978) Collocation and least squares methods as a tool for handling gravity field dependent data obtained through space research techniques. In: Hieber S, Guyenne TD (eds) On space oceanography, navigation and geodynamics European workshop. European Space Agency, pp 141–149
Vaní P, Krakiwsky E (1982) Geodesy—the concepts. The North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fašková, Z., Čunderlík, R. & Mikula, K. Finite element method for solving geodetic boundary value problems. J Geod 84, 135–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0349-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0349-7